Ford Spends $1.3B on Super Duty Plant in Kentucky So You Don't Have To Wait Again

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 28th, 2020 Published: December 1st, 2015

Ford announced Tuesday that it would spend $1.3 billion to retool, update and build a new body shop for its Louisville, Kentucky plant, which produces its Super Duty truck and large SUVs.

The announced spending, which will create 2,000 jobs at the plant, is part of Ford’s new contract with the United Auto Workers — and part of the automaker’s last deal with the UAW, according to Automotive News.

The investment will create an all-new body shop for the aluminum-bodied truck scheduled to go on sale late next year. With an all-new shop, production of the outgoing truck can continue while the new shop gets online, which could help the automaker avoid another shortage when the redesigned truck hits dealers.

This year, Ford had smaller F-150 inventories than normal because its Dearborn, Michigan and Kansas City facilities were closed as the automaker retooled for the next generation, aluminum bodied, light-duty pickup. Ford said its inventories didn’t fully recover until late in the second quarter of 2015.

Ford said the $1.3 billion investment will add to its $80 million investment at the truck plant in 2014 and a $129 million investment at nearby Louisville Assembly, which produces the Lincoln MKC and Ford Escape.

“Adding new jobs and more investment at Kentucky Truck Plant not only secures a solid foundation for our UAW members, but also strengthens the communities in which they live, work and play,” Jimmy Settles, UAW vice president said in a statement. “Such success highlights our members’ hard work and dedication to building world-class, quality vehicles like the Super Duty.”

According to WDRB in Louisville, workers at the Kentucky Truck Plant two weeks ago rejected the latest deal with the automaker by 2-to-1.

#BodyShop #Ford #Kentucky #Louisville #SuperDuty #Trucks #UnitedAutoWorkers

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

12 comments

Carlson Fan on Dec 01, 2015

Being in a state that heavily salts its roads during winter, I'm all for aluminum bodied PU trucks. I didn't realize Ford was also going that route with their new HD model. Good for them.

Like Reply
- See 9 previous
- Drzhivago138 on Dec 01, 2015
  
  Even better (IMO): They're sharing cabs with the F-150 again.
  
  Like
- Bball40dtw on Dec 01, 2015
  
  And their large SUVs.
  
  Like
- Carlson Fan on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @Drzhivago138 "Even better (IMO): They’re sharing cabs with the F-150 again." Agreed! I didn't know that.
  
  Like
- Dal20402 on Dec 01, 2015
  
  Frame is still steel, will still rot. Expect to see a bunch of complaints about rotting frames 6-8 years from now, with the complainers not grasping that with an older truck the body would have been rotting too.
  
  Like
- RideHeight on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @dal20402 That's going to make for some interesting used truck shopping; bring your own creeper & wide-beam flashlight.
  
  Like
- Big Al from Oz on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @bball40dtw dal20402, Frames are a bigger issue and lets hope not only Frod but all manufacturers look more closely at corrosion in the newer, lighter frames. The newer frames are a higher tensile steel. This equates to more carbon alloyed into the steel, thus decreasing the chassis ability to counter corrosion. The Ford HD's should be much better than the lighter aluminium F-150 chassis. The F-150 chassis is much thinner than the older steel pickups chassis and they are fabricated with a much higher tensile steel.
  
  Like
- Big Al from Oz on Dec 01, 2015
  
  Drzhivago138, It's good to see the sharing of bodies between the F-150 and the HD's. The size of the full size pickup has grown to the point where it would be useless to make and use a larger body. This also cuts down on the cost per unit for the more expensive aluminium pickups. The weight savings on the Ford HDs is not much. So the sharing of bodies is more about cost cutting.
  
  Like
- Bullnuke on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @dal20402 I dunno about frame rot problems. My '99 F350 Crewcab has gone through 16 winters in West-Central Ohio with the crappy salty slushy roads. I was under it recently replacing the starter (original OEM by Mitsubishi no less!) and nothing was really bad anywhere on the frame. I did need to replace the brake line a few years ago to the rear axle due to corrosion and the bottom of one of the rear doors is starting to rot but the frame, fasteners, springs, axles, running gear is all in pretty good shape. The wax coating on the frame is holding up as well.
  
  Like
- Carlson Fan on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @bullnuke After 11 MN winters the frame and body on my '04 GMC HD are in excellent shape. Rockers are usually one of the areas these GM trucks start to rust first but mine has had mud flaps on it from day one (keeping the front wheels from throwing salt and sand into them) which Is why I think they are still good and solid.
  
  Like
- Drzhivago138 on Dec 01, 2015
  
  @Big Al from Oz Definitely. Full-size pickups hit the "ceiling" in width back in the early '60s at 78-80", and I think they have maybe hit the limits in other dimensions too. Ford did a good job at holding on to the 1999 Super Duty cab for over 15 years, but GM and Ram have saved a lot of trouble not having to produce 2 seperate bodies for the 1/2-ton and HDs.
  
  Like
Lou_BC on Dec 01, 2015

I don't see frame rust as a big issue in the part of British Columbia where I live. My 2010 F150 has been fine so far. I had an F250 for 15 years and no issues. I suspect once again we seen our Australian friend continuing on with his anti-Ford anti-aluminum commentary.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
ToolGuy Correct answer is the one that isn't a Honda.