Ask the B&B: Do Bad Panel Gaps Mean Poor Vehicle Quality?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

These photos are of a vehicle that recently visited my driveway for a week. I’m not going to tell you what that vehicle is — yet — but it does raise a very interesting question.

Are bad panel gaps an indicator of a poor quality product? And what “quality” are we talking about anyway?

I ask this question genuinely because there are all kinds of reasons why panels wouldn’t line up quite like they should.

Gaps could still be within tolerance

While a panel gap may look visually unappealing, the measurements themselves could still be within tolerances specified by the automaker. If so, the people on the assembly line are simply doing their job to spec. However, it could also mean those tolerances account for far too wide of a variance.

It could be a one-off issue

The panels on one particular vehicle may be poorly matched, but one vehicle does not a trend make.

Panels aren’t mechanical systems

Exterior panels are not subject to the same tolerances as mechanical parts because they don’t need to be. Outside of vast misalignments of panels that may make a door pinch a front quarter panel when opened, a large or awkward gap between misaligned panels is going to have very little effect on the performance of your vehicle.

However, this is me playing devil’s advocate. All of these reasons seem fairly ludicrous in today’s high-tech world of manufacturing. We have lasers — freakin’ lasers! — in factories now. And robots. And robots with lasers for eyes.

But, are these gaps indicative of other problems? If an automaker doesn’t care to button up visual issues on vehicles rolling off the factory line — even after what we can presume are quality checks at the end for such issues — are those same people overlooking other issues as well?

Lexus is notoriously known for minding the gap. Lesser-known gapminder Hyundai inspired General Motors to do a better job of fitting panels.

However, it seems the automaker that buttoned together the vehicle pictured didn’t learn the same lesson.

What do you think, B&B?

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 141 comments
  • 66 West 66 West on Nov 27, 2015

    How long do we have to wait to find out what car it is? :)

  • Zoomzoomfan Zoomzoomfan on Dec 22, 2015

    I'm not sure if the panel gaps reflect poor overall quality, but that's certainly what it'd lead me to believe. How can the mechanical bits be trustworthy (or even the electrical) if they can't get the doors to fit together well? The issue is, however, most Americans would NEVER notice that nor would they particularly care if they did.

  • Analoggrotto Kia Tasman is waiting to offer the value quotient to the discerning consumer and those who have provided healthy loyalty numbers thinks to class winning product such as Telluride, Sorento, Sportage and more. Vehicles like this overpriced third world junker are for people who take out massive loans and pay it down for 84 months while Kia buyers of grand affluence choose shorter lease terms to stay fresh and hip with the latest excellence of HMC.
  • SCE to AUX That terrible fuel economy hardly seems worth the premium for the hybrid.Toyota is definitely going upmarket with the new Tacoma; we'll see if they've gone too far for people's wallets.As for the towing capacity - I don't see a meaningful difference between 6800 lbs and 6000 lbs. If you routinely tow that much, you should probably upgrade your vehicle to gain a little margin.As for the Maverick - I doubt it's being cross-shopped with the Tacoma very much. Its closest competitor seems to be the Santa Cruz.
  • Rochester Give me the same deal on cars comparable to the new R3, and I'll step up. That little R3 really appeals to me.
  • Carson D It will work out exactly the way it did the last time that the UAW organized VW's US manufacturing operations.
  • Carson D A friend of mine bought a Cayenne GTS last week. I was amazed how small the back seat is. Did I expect it to offer limousine comfort like a Honda CR-V? I guess not. That it is far more confining and uncomfortable than any 4-door Civic made in the past 18 years was surprising. It reminded me of another friend's Mercedes-Benz CLS550 from a dozen years ago. It seems like a big car, but really it was a 2+2 with the utilitarian appearance of a 4-door sedan. The Cayenne is just an even more utilitarian looking 2+2. I suppose the back seat is bigger than the one in the Porsche my mother drove 30 years ago. The Cayenne's luggage bay is huge, but Porsche's GTs rarely had problems there either.
Next