Is Tesla Going to Partner With China's Google To Build A Car?

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 30th, 2020 Published: October 23rd, 2015

Tesla could start building cars in China within two years, which could help the automaker jumpstart sales there and increase volume for the small automaker, Reuters reported.

Tesla chief Elon Musk said the car company could cut costs on cars for sale there by one-third. Normally, foreign automakers are required to partner with domestic companies before building cars in China. For example, General Motors has partnered with SAIC Motor since 1998, who also partners with Volkswagen.

Musk said Tesla is already partnering with Baidu, China’s largest search engine, to provide GPS data.

Wait. Tesla is already partnering with China’s largest search engine company? That sounds, um, interesting.

According to Reuters, Tesla has sold 3,025 Model S cars in China during the first nine months of this year. By producing the cars in China, Tesla could significantly increase sales and quash some questionable competition in that country.

However, the automaker’s partnership with Baidu could prove to be more interesting and fruitful than a joint venture with Lifan (BS: “A JV with tiny Lifan would bring Tesla nothing,”) or Chang’an (BS: “Basically, it would be a JV with China’s military-industrial complex.”)

In June, Baidu said that it would make available its first driverless car in the second half of 2015, according to the BBC. That car, which was developed with BMW, would be the first prototype for the company. (BMW has a JV with Brilliance Auto.)

According to the BBC:

The head of Baidu’s deep learning lab Yu Kai has previously told the press that the firm does not agree with Google’s view of a completely autonomous car, looking instead to develop a vehicle that will retain the traditional pedals but give the driver greater freedom.

We know of one: In October, Tesla rolled out its autonomous software for many of its Model S sedans in America.

Just saying.

#AutonomousCars #Baidu #China #ElonMusk #Tesla

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 5 comments

Tengu on Oct 23, 2015

For security reasons China developed its own GPS system called Beidou (North Star). It would make sense that the largest search engine company in China would have deep expertise with mapping software using that data. Also it's possible that China would not let any foreign company know about inner workings of its GPS system.

Like Reply
Bigtruckseriesreview @ Youtube on Oct 23, 2015

Unlike STUPID AMERICA, China practices totalitarian economic protectionism. They won't let you do ANYTHING there unless it's a joint-venture and they are getting a cut. They build companies in other countries and send their people there to work them. when President Trump is sworn in, he can put our affairs in order.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Von on Oct 24, 2015
  
  Trump is an entertainer, no wonder you like him. President Trump though, will bankrupt this country and will be talking to bankers at 3am, outside, in the rain, begging for a loan extension. Only this time, they will be Chinese instead of Japanese. Scary thing is, I'll probably vote for him over Clinton, if it comes to that. We are pretty damn well doomed.
  
  Like
- NickS on Oct 25, 2015
  
  Putting our affairs in order requires a well oiled political system that can process the small day to day as well as large-scale long-term strategic policy. We haven't had that for almost a couple of decades now. Anyone who thinks that one party or one person can somehow change all this is naive. Campaign financing, political donations lobbying and legislative capture, gerymandering, you name it all the deep systemic problems stand no chance of getting dealt with in the foreseeable future. That is our future. Take govt shutdowns. They are part of regular political brinkmanship purely for the sake of disfunction. How is this any indication the country can solve problems? Take just one example, any example of a problem needing a solution. Gridlock. You mentioned trump. This is exactly it. The loudest and most uneducated idiots in the furtest fringes and darkest corners want the absolute biggest ass clown as a candidate. What you need is the most boring, predictable, cautious, and astute candidate with knowledge and experience in negotiation, trade, commerce, economics, science and world politics. not a trump or a Palin or any other whack job to fill peoples brain with crap. Everyone will benefit from having sensible down to earth candidates in all parties. Seriously, china for all their ills can execute! We can't. We just argue so we can argue some more. And if you think china is somehow stoppable ... good luck with that. You really don't know the elephant in the room. The best we can do is work tige If you really want to put your country's affairs in order you stand a better chance of success by moving to China.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)