Ford Unveils New Aluminum 2017 Super Duty Pickup

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Ford on Thursday rolled out its newest Super Duty truck — 350 pounds lighter than the outgoing model — complete with aluminum-alloy body, high-strength steel frame and new 6-speed transmission for its V-8 engine.

According to Ford, the truck’s frame is up to 24 times stiffer than the outgoing frame, and the company reportedly used high-strength, military-grade aluminum alloys — which are separate from civilian grade because they use more of it before 9 a.m. than we’ll use all day. Or something.

The Super Duty truck can be fitted with either a 6.7-liter V-8 turbocharged diesel, a 6.8-liter V-10 gasoline or 6.2-liter V-8 gasoline engine, with the latter being mated to a new TorqShift-G six-speed transmission.

The Super Duty will reportedly come with up to seven cameras for better visibility around the truck, including a cargo-light mounted camera for easier gooseneck trailer hitch coupling; a combination, bird’s eye camera for nearby objects; and an available trailer camera from the factory to improve visibility when towing.

New driver assist technologies including blind-spot monitoring and steering assist will be available on the new truck. According to Ford, steering assist will help owners more easily navigate slow-speed maneuvers and will limit the truck’s sensitivity at high speeds.

Ford says that all three cab configurations — SuperCab, Regular Cab and CrewCab — would be longer than the previous generation, although exact dimensions weren’t specified. Five trims — XL, XLT, Lariat, King Ranch and Platinum — will be available in the new Super Duty.

Ford said the 2017 Super Duty models would go on sale next year, but didn’t specify pricing.

We will have a full review of the previous Super Duty next week.









Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
15 of 137 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Sep 25, 2015

    The first thing that came to my mind when I saw that image was the 1982 Ford Futura. That is now the ugliest pickup truck in the WORLD!

    • See 11 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Sep 27, 2015

      @Vulpine Of the ''80 to '82 'anything' (mainstream/everyday) the Mustang, Camaro had to the best looking out there. At least to my "80's child" eyes. I still think so. But I was talking midsize sedans. The Fox platform was ahead of everyone else, looks-wise, first showing up for the '78 MY.

  • Mopar4wd Mopar4wd on Sep 25, 2015

    I love the 94 Dodge (I'm biased) I do think Fords design has gone down hill I really liked the previous f-150 and the original Super Duties (1998) but the new ones seem pretty ugly. Like their trying to out ugly the Tundra. I know it's subjective but hey almost everything in the comment section of a blog is subjective.

    • DenverMike DenverMike on Sep 25, 2015

      The '94+ Cummins equipped Dodge trucks may never die, the way it's looking. Same with the previous gen w/Cummins, but I've got a '98 gasoline Dodge extra cab I'm hording (bad trans) and now I know why. I has a prefect rust-free body and it's parts will be worth something in no time.

  • 3-On-The-Tree 2014 Ford F150 Ecoboost 3.5L. By 80,000mi I had to have the rear main oil seal replaced twice. Driver side turbo leaking had to have all hoses replaced. Passenger side turbo had to be completely replaced. Engine timing chain front cover leak had to be replaced. Transmission front pump leak had to be removed and replaced. Ford renewed my faith in Extended warranty’s because luckily I had one and used it to the fullest. Sold that truck on caravan and got me a 2021 Tundra Crewmax 4x4. Not a fan of turbos and I will never own a Ford again much less cars with turbos to include newer Toyotas. And I’m a Toyota guy.
  • Duke Woolworth Weight 4800# as I recall.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Nissan Frontier @78000 miles has been oil changes ( eng/ diffs/ tranny/ transfer). Still on original brakes and second set of tires.
  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÃœV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
Next