By on July 30, 2014

MBUSI Mercedes-Benz Alabama

The National Labor Relations Board ruled this week that the U.S. branch of Mercedes-Benz violated the right to organize among its employees at the automaker’s Vance, Ala. plant by prohibiting the distribution of union literature in common areas outside working hours.

Automotive News reports Judge Keltner Locke found for the plaintiffs on one complaint out of a number of complaints made against MBUSI regarding its violation of the National Labor Relations Act. In his decision, Judge Locke determined the areas where the subsidiary considered off-limits to dissemination were mixed-use areas — and thus, areas where material could be distributed freely — and that by “maintaining a solicitation and distribution rule which employees reasonably could understand to prohibit all solicitation in work areas,” MBUSI was in violation of the act.

Though no penalties were levied in the decision, the ruling ordered MBUSI to amend its rule so that off-the-clock employees may solicit other such employees. Mercedes stated that while they were pleased with most of Judge Locke’s ruling, citing his affirmation of its neutrality with regard to its employees, they disagreed with some aspects and were “evaluating next steps.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

14 Comments on “NLRB: Mercedes Violated Labor Act In Alabama Facility...”


  • avatar
    thelaine

    Mexico

  • avatar
    CoreyDL

    I shall bring my question here!

    Where did Jack’s article go about him leaving? I clicked it from my email, read it through, and when I went to comment the article was gone and now I can’t access it!

    It WAS here:

    http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2014/07/theres-no-pill-for-contextual-dysfunction/

  • avatar
    Waterview

    I can’t clim to fully understand union organizing laws, but I find it interesting that our federal government can mandate that a business owner provide space on his own private property for the distribution of materials that may likely be adverse to the success of his business. I’m neither pro, nor anti-union, but I would prefer the government tell unions to find public space to conduct their organizing activities.

    • 0 avatar
      Landcrusher

      Many of the rules for this stuff only make sense when you look into the crazy stuff going on at the times they were made. Of course, in the 21st century the rule itself makes no sense, but it can’t be changed because a bunch of wing nuts hold ideological views which would self destruct if they tried to examine them rationally.

      :)

    • 0 avatar
      sitting@home

      The laws probably exist so that any work related forum or issue can get an audience without fear of corporate retribution. It may not be unions, but maybe someone has a legitimate concern about the cleanliness of a restroom or simply wants to set up a site pool league, as long as they’re not doing it on company time then it shouldn’t necessarily be banned from company property.

  • avatar

    Alabama has labor laws?

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    The ruling sounds justified, but surely nobody thinks that having more literature in-hand will improve the chances of organizing these workers.

  • avatar
    Clueless Economist

    So one German company (VW) has to have union representative to appease a IG Metall’s demand for a works council so VW is actively supportive of the UAW in organizing but two other German companies (M-B and BMW)actively fight against union representation in the states. Does IG Metall not represent auto workers in Germany? Something doesn’t make sense here.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: TTAC’s Own Bigtruckseriesreview Goes Viral

    PonchoIndian - Vulpine you don’t need dyno numbers, its figured out from a formula using gear ratios, tire size, engine hp etc…...
  • Re: Bark’s Bites: Viva La Fiesta!

    mnm4ever - I am not going to tell you that you are crazy. I actually think this a good idea. I bet you can get some insane trade-in value on your Boss right now, and if...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    Featherston - I was just looking at the Cadillac configurator and was going to mention this. I believe when the ATS first came out, and perhaps when Ur-Turn was buying,...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    Flybrian - This one made it to 316,000 miles… http://imagizer.imageshack.us/ v2/800x600q90/540/DvgZ7H.jpg http://imagizer.imageshack....
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    CAMeyer - To focus on the appearance of these vehicles, as ugly as they were, is to overlook how they drove, which was…even uglier. I had one of these as a...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    bball40dtw - I can only dream.
  • Re: While You Were Sleeping: February 11th, 2015

    tresmonos - RR: Take your Metamucil and go back to your sh1t for brains macroeconomics rants.
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    NVHGuru - No it doesn’t ; ( When I looked at a GTi the lease price for a $28k VW was much more than I’m paying for a $44k Cadillac – but I guess you get...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    danio3834 - A loaded 200C pretty well defines entry level luxury today. Stuff like self parking, active collision avoidance etc. were still pie in the sky type things in...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    DeadWeight - Only GM owners can “brag” about “only” having to replace major suspension & other mechanical components in less than 50,000 miles...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States