Nissan's Fake Altima Racer Stunt

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

This is a clever video. To save you the trouble of watching it, the story works like so:

Nissan took a bunch of people whom the average TTACer would probably not characterize as “automotive enthusiasts” for passenger rides in “the new Altima race car”. At the end of a day filled with some faux-racing action, the assembled passengers are treated to a tear-down of one of the Altima racers. It turns out that all the “race stuff” — the aluminum interior, the spoilers, the graphics — is removable and that underneath is an Altima 3.5 SL.

You can look at this one of two ways:

0. The Nissan Altima is indistinguishable from a race car. That’s what the video is meant to convey. That’s obviously not true, as long as the person doing the distinguishing has actual experience with race cars. There’s no rollcage in the thing, it rides and steers softly, and it has real glass all the way around.

1. Most people have no idea of the actual handling limits of the modern automobile, and therefore they interpret a car being driven at the actual limits of the modern automobile as a race car. I’d say that’s a solid BINGO. When I took a Camry to Summit Point last year, my passengers were frankly amazed by what it could do — and some of them had plenty of track time under their belts already. My Accord can break 120mph on the front straight at Putnam. A few years ago, you needed a Corvette to put up that number. Not any more.

So what’s the moral of the story? It’s simple: whatever car you’re driving, as long as it’s a car and not a CUV or SUV, is probably faster and more dynamic than you think it is. It wouldn’t be a waste of your time to try a HPDE or two to find out for yourself. Why not do it this year?


Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Mechaman Mechaman on May 09, 2014

    ..or not. There are too many idiots out there for my taste, and I can't expect them to wad up their cars on a track.

  • Dbelski Dbelski on Aug 25, 2014

    I was reading this article and I see no mention of Altima SERs. Yes those were made in 05-06. I have one that I use in HPDE. Those car were really quick and well handled right out of the box. With good pads and rubber they are as quick as any 350z, and if you want more power there is plenty mods do push it pass 350 HP.

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next