SUV Driver Hits Cycling Children, Kills One, Sues Family Of Dead Child

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Six months after 17-year-old Brandon Majewski was run down by a 42-year-old female SUV driver in a residential community north of Toronto, his 23-year-old brother was found dead from an overdose. His family believes it was “grief” that killed him. Now, the people who lost two sons in half a year have another problem: a million-dollar-plus lawsuit from the woman who was responsible for at least one of those deaths.



According to the Barrie Examiner,

Brandon, a spunky and handsome 17-year-old bike enthusiast, was out with two buddies at around 1:30 a.m. on Oct. 28, 2012, when they hopped on their bicycles to go for hotdogs.

Not long after, an SUV crashed into the boys on Innisfil Beach Road, killing Brandon and badly injuring his friend Richard McLean, 16, who suffered a broken pelvis and other serious injuries. His other pal Jake Roberts, 16, received only scratches.

Now the driver of the SUV – a former Innisfil resident – Sharlene Simon, 42, a mother of three, is suing the dead boy for the emotional trauma she says the crash has caused her. She’s also suing the two other boys, as well as the dead boy’s parents, and even his brother, who has since died. She’s also suing the County of Simcoe for failing to maintain the road.

Ms. Simon’s lawsuit alleges that the children were “incompetent cyclists”. Local police believe she was speeding at the time, doing approximately 90 km/h in an 80 zone. She claims that she never saw the reflectors on the bicycles.

Additional coverage from RT notes that

Simon was being followed in a separate car by her husband, a York Regional police officer, and did not undergo a breathalyzer test, since police did not believe she was driving under the influence. Simon’s husband drove her home after the accident and no charges were filed.

Presumably “police” in this case means “the colleagues of her husband”.

Here at TTAC, we like to flatter ourselves that we can see both sides of every story — but it’s hard to generate too much sympathy for Mrs. Simon here.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 154 comments
  • Signal11 Signal11 on Apr 30, 2014

    Jack Baruth: "Here at TTAC, we like to flatter ourselves that we can see both sides of every story — but it’s hard to generate too much sympathy for Mrs. Simon here." Don't kid yourself, you're no better than Fox News for one-sided, yellow journalism.

  • Ron B. Ron B. on May 01, 2014

    The fault is difficult to asses because the police didn't investigate the accident in an attempt to protect "one of theirs". Police world wide are guilty of this. but the real story is who is telling this sorry woman that she will win the suit? yes it's the ambulance chaser. I have been driving in all conditions on roads around the world for close to 50 years and the simple rules still stand. You drive according to the conditions . If a wall appears before you ..do you drive into it and then say that the wall is poorly lit or was placed in dangerous place? of course you don't,but transpose that wall for three cyclists and do you then blame them for suddenly appearing in front of you ? looking ahead is a simple part of driving .if you cant see ,you either slow right down or stop. If you are so drunk your spouse has to follow you home in a police car yo should never have been driving in the first place and if you kill someone because your reflexes are dulled by substances yo took,then the grief and trauma you feel is the punishment you deserve , and I hope it stays with you for life.

    • See 2 previous
    • Signal11 Signal11 on May 10, 2014

      @CRConrad Quote from the National Post: - A collision reconstruction team from the South Simcoe Police Service investigated the crash; their 26-page report found that the “lack of visibility” of the cyclists “was the largest contributing factor,” and that on a dark overcast night, “the driver of the Kia did not see the cyclists on the roadway and was unable to make an evasive reaction.” The report says police consulted with a local Crown prosecutor, who told them there was “absolutely no reasonable prospect of conviction and that no charges should be laid.” - But hey, feel free to bulldog this with your view from the nosebleeds.

  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
Next