Ontario Government Selling GM Shares To Fund Public Transit

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The government of Ontario has announced it will sell its shares in General Motors as part of an effort to fund new public transit programs in the Greater Toronto Area. But the move could end up hastening the demise of GM’s Oshawa plant, located in the same metropolitan area.

According to The Globe and Mail, the sale could net about $1.4 billion for the province, which would “wait over the next year for the best time to sell.” While divesting its stake isn’t necessarily a bad thing, the timing of the sale coincides with two events that have a major impact on Oshawa’s future.

The first is the expiration of GM’s Vitality Commitment, a document signed during the bailout as part of the terms for receiving government funds., which requires GM to keep 16 percent of production in Canada until GM’s loan to the Canadian and Ontario government is re-paid, or until December 31, 2016, whichever comes first.

With the loans repaid, and GM’s shares now being sold off, the biggest question mark for Oshawa will be the expiration of GM’s contract with Unifor (formerly the CAW), which will expire in 2016, along with Unifor’s Ford and Chrysler contracts.

Oshawa has slowly seen its product whittled away, most recently losing the Chevrolet Camaro to Lansing, Michigan where the Cadillac ATS is built. As of now, the Flex Line (one of two assembly lines) has no unique product, with the Cadillac XTS and Chevrolet Impala also built in Michigan, the Buick Regal is also built in Germany and the Chevrolet Equinox/GMC Terrain are made in multiple locations.

The Consolidated Line, which builds the old W-Body Impala for fleets, is due to be shut down in 2016. The big question is whether the Flex Line will follow. The 2016 date may provide an easy out for GM, since it can use the labor contract expiry to close down Oshawa.

The plant’s closing would be a devastating blow to Oshawa, which is just as much of a “GM Town” as Flint, Michigan was in the “Roger & Me” era. Of the Detroit Three plants currently operating in Ontario, Oshawa has been in jeopardy the longest – but at this point, it’s an inevitability.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • Oboylepr Oboylepr on Apr 14, 2014

    The fat lady is on the stage and she's about to start singing. It's over for GM in Oshawa. They want out badly, its been heading that way for years so its only a matter of time. Oshawa will live on though. It's fortunes are not as tied up in GM as was once the case. That said, I wonder what will become of the thousands of acres of manufacturing space that is there now. Will it be left to rot or will some enterprising Canadian buy some or all of it and start a trully 'domestic' auto industry. Well I'm not holding my breath. Ontario is not a right-to-work province. Who in their right mind would make such an investment? No, as the say in the old country, "it's all over bar the shouting"

    • Scwmcan Scwmcan on Apr 16, 2014

      Just because Ontario is not a right to work province doesn't mean an automaker couldn't buy the plant when it closed and reopen it with non union labour, both Honda and Toyota have operated non union plants in Ontario for years. As Mike has said UNIFOR does not seem to have the clout that the CAW had back in the day.

  • Mikey Mikey on Apr 14, 2014

    @ oboylepr.....Havn't heard from you ages. Your right. the Shwa has certainly diversified. Maybe its wishfull thinking,but I don't see GM closing the Flex. Because of the plants flexability, a can see GM using it for overflow from the US plants. Though, I wouldn't rule out seeing Kia, or Hyundai, buying it?

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next