The Golf Turns 40 As TTAC Looks Back At The Man Behind The Launch

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

March 29th, 1973 marks the anniversary of the Volkswagen Golf’s introduction some 40 years ago. Although Volkswagen’s official communications tout the car as a runaway success, the front-drive, water-cooled car wasn’t met with such an enthusiastic reception at the outset.

The true story of the Golf (or at least an entertaining one that runs counter to the PR hagiography disseminated by Volkswagen), and its success can only be told by one Bertel Schmitt, who recounted it in “The Autobiography of BS”, back in 2009. Rather than relay it here, I urge you all to check out the original, which is best relayed with Bertel’s unique diction, droll sense of humor and his eye for the absurd.

During my time working with Bertel, much of our business was conducted via the phone, with hour-long chats where Bertel would relay the “directors cut” version of his time working with Volkswagen. Much of it was unpublishable, and I was often left reeling at the end of it, having difficulty processing the sheer amount of information and detail. But the end result was a “Karate Kid” style of mentorship. Bertel was effectively planting the seeds of industry knowledge in my brain, giving me the context and background knowledge I needed to do my job, while giving me enough autonomy to let me screw up, get things wrong and learn the hard way – by getting flayed by the B&B in the comments.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 27 comments
  • Marcelo de Vasconcellos Marcelo de Vasconcellos on Mar 31, 2014

    Though I recognize the ultimate importance of the Golf and a 40 yrs run (though of course its been many cars under the same name) is impossible to ignore, the Golf has never done it for me. I always thought the competition offered better and I'd always choose one of them over the Golf. From the first to the seventh. As to Bertel, whatever where his peculiar viewpoints and opinions, his role in the industry and knowledge of it is undeniable. Anyways, happy 40th Golf!

    • See 1 previous
    • Marcelo de Vasconcellos Marcelo de Vasconcellos on Apr 02, 2014

      @Corey Lewis At various times it'd have been different cars. I always liked the Tipo or Brava more. The current Bravo, although long in the tooth, is pretty attractive. There have been Méganes I'd take over any Golf. Some Peugeots and Citroëns. The current 308 is sweet. And of course, the Fords. Any Escort or Focus, pls. The GMs are probably the ones I'd like the least. Especially the Brazilian versions hampered by their decades old engines. Some Euro Opels have been pretty good too. Yeah, too much choice. With better rides, engines, features, cost/benefit. The Golf has really never been my thing.

  • Dave M. Dave M. on Mar 31, 2014

    When the GTI first reached our shores I just HAD to have one...but I was so upside down on my car it was mission impossible. Like a Honda, despite intents and desires I've never had the opportunity to own one (I've always needed more cargo space), but I will someday. Golfs are beautiful cars - driver's delight, always function before form. It is rumored/gossiped they'll be bringing over the Golf convertible to replace the Eos...this I would love.

  • U mad scientist U mad scientist on Mar 31, 2014

    > Bertel was effectively planting the seeds of industry knowledge in my brain, giving me the context and background knowledge I needed to do my job, while giving me enough autonomy to let me screw up, get things wrong and learn the hard way – by getting flayed by the B&B in the comments. Bertel for all his pretense was remarkably unaware of industry details. I wasn't really looking at TTAC at the time but happened upon the self-proclaimed informative article about modular platforms while researching it myself: http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2013/06/mqb-fud-burdened-by-legacy-platforms-gm-fights-off-the-kits-and-what-are-those-kits-anyway/ For all the praise in the comments this is nothing more than regurgitating press materials and looking up what kit means in the dictionary. Even worse, none of the "B&B computer experts/engineers" managed to point out the value of abstract interfaces despite its coincidental reference in the article.

    • See 1 previous
    • U mad scientist U mad scientist on Apr 01, 2014

      @Diewaldo The crux of the issue is that every business needs some competitive core competency. TTAC is never going to compete with any major pubs based on volume, and thus needs quality. As mentioned it's worth living up to the name and start investigating the truth about cars. For example, what really is a "platform" or "kit". How do those drive by wire pedals work anyway. Anatomy of a marketing campaign. The economics behind quarterly reports. Pitfalls of car financing. The list of topics where insight matters is endless. Provide a platform for either insiders or those with relevant expertise to build a veritable collection of value instead of chasing after sensationalist daily hits. Baruth does this to an extent with the car review shell game et al, but the car enthusiast internet sorely needs more expose behind the industry's opaque curtains.

  • El scotto El scotto on Mar 31, 2014

    Sorry, your much beloved and often butt-kissed Bertel was nothing more than a petty tyrant who couldn't even run an autoblog. His pettiness and childishness turned many a reader away from TTAC. Berthle's almost daily anti-American rants where mildy amusing at first, and unacceptable at the end. Was I shocked when the "Emperor of TTAC" was told he had no clothes? Nope, not a bit. His inglorious exit was totally appropriate for a man of his intellect and caliber. Yeah, you could say I loathed The Banhammer.

Next