UAW Money Woes Worry Detroit Three

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

With declining membership and fees paired with a defeat in a close election recently held at Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn., the Detroit Three fear the United Auto Workers not only have no future, but their replacement would bring back the days of turmoil settled over a decade before.

The Detroit Free Press reports the three Detroit automakers worry the UAW could be absorbed by another, more hostile union not as willing to keep labor costs competitive with overseas competitors, as well disrupting the brokered peace which set lower wages for new hires and health care concessions that brought United States production costs on parity with Japan.

Meanwhile, the UAW continues to weaken, as annual dues fell by 40 percent to $115 million over the period between 2006 and 2012 with membership falling by 30 percent to 382,000 in the same period, having peaked at 1.5 million members in 1979. The union’s assets totaled $1 billion in 2012, making the UAW the wealthiest union the U.S., though $300 million in assets were liquidated in the six-year period to pay operating expenses while spending was cut 15 percent; $47 million in assets were sold in the last year alone to balance the union’s budget. Further, with lower wages from new workers unable to fill the coffers fast enough to make up the difference, the UAW may raise dues for the first time in 47 years.

In UAW president Bob King’s view, the union has no future without an organized South, where transplants such as VW and BMW have expanded in the region over the past decade as more and more factories in and around Detroit closed. King’s potential successor, secretary-treasurer Dennis Williams, has vowed to fight on, from higher wages for new hires to more organization battles in the South; the UAW recently filed an appeal with the National Labor Relations Board over the outcome of the Volkswagen vote.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
13 of 87 comments
  • Stanczyk Stanczyk on Feb 26, 2014

    They dont know yet that the moment they will 'escape' from union boss control...they'll be ripped by their 'new' greedy VW bosses (..i.e: .. in few weeks wages cut by half .. and than fired, because VW'll close factory and move out to .. china or mexico..:) .. welcome to globalisation .. ... 'executive kinda guys' don't care about you (you are just 'human resources':) .. they care about 'company strategy/position', cost cutting, .. and their bonuses .. :)

  • Joe_thousandaire Joe_thousandaire on Feb 27, 2014

    The Big3 are in no way worried about the UAW going under, its just a nice thing to leak to the press, "oh jeez I hope you guys don't go under, cause we're such good friends and all". The fact that this was reported by the openly liberal and pro-union Freep says allot about its b.s. level too. As far as what xflowgolf is saying about rebranding the union, he's missing the whole point of the UAW to begin with. The entire existence of the UAW since its inception has been to take the lowest skilled, least educated, and laziest members of the American work force and give them simple repetition-based jobs at which they cannot fail or be fired from. Then through force of numbers make management pay them all upper middle-class wages. Absolutely no one who works for the UAW sees their membership as something to be earned, it is a birthright handed down by the gods to every GED or equivalent man and woman here in Michigan.

    • See 10 previous
    • U mad scientist U mad scientist on Feb 27, 2014

      @racer-esq. > If you really want to unwind history they only got the transplant factories, instead of them going to Mexico or staying at home, because of right-to-work laws and an anti-union culture. Fair point, but imo doesn't alter the conclusion above. The smart move would've been to set a trap for that bait.

  • Michael Gallagher I agree to a certain extent but I go back to the car SUV transition. People began to buy SUVs because they were supposedly safer because of their larger size when pitted against a regular car. As more SUVs crowded the road that safety advantage began to dwindle as it became more likely to hit an equally sized SUV. Now there is no safety advantage at all.
  • Probert The new EV9 is even bigger - a true monument of a personal transportation device. Not my thing, but credit where credit is due - impressive. The interior is bigger than my house and much nicer with 2 rows of lounge seats and 3rd for the plebes. 0-60 in 4.5 seconds, around 300miles of range, and an e-mpg of 80 (90 for the 2wd). What a world.
  • Ajla "Like showroom" is a lame description but he seems negotiable on the price and at least from what the two pictures show I've dealt with worse. But, I'm not interested in something with the Devil's configuration.
  • Tassos Jong-iL I really like the C-Class, it reminds me of some trips to Russia to visit Dear Friend VladdyPoo.
  • ToolGuy New Hampshire
Next