The Wobble Comes To An End As Consumer Reports Echoes TTACs Criticisms Of The Jeep Cherokee

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

In late 2013, TTAC was invited to review the Jeep Cherokee. As the journalist assigned to cover the launch, I gave what I felt was a nuanced but critical assessment of the vehicle: that it delivered with respect to its off-road prowess, but left a lot to be desired in other areas, namely the on-road driving experience and overall packaging.

TTAC was alone in its criticisms, with other outlets heaping praise on the Cherokee for attributes that I felt were lacking. A backlash from readers, Mopar fans and other entities ensued, and we were left looking like a fringe element of anti-Cherokee cranks, despite what we as an organization felt was a fair and nuanced, if – ahem – slightly colorful review of the car. It turns out that in the end, we weren’t alone.

Consumer Reports recently delivered their verdict on the Cherokee, and their examples (ostensibly one that they purchased) were criticized for many of the same issues that TTAC did, namely, poor dynamics, a choppy ride and an unrefined 9-speed automatic transmission. Only TTAC and CR have called out the Cherokee for these issues, with other media outlets either downplaying, ignoring or outright praising these elements. Since then, the media has been happy to give the car more positive press, spinning its respectable but mid-pack sales figures into some kind of Cinderella story.

When you are the lone outlet taking a controversial stance on a new car, it can be tough to weather the accusations of bias or even outright malice. Everyone wonders why your impressions are so different from the rest of the pack. In addition, you are left even more vulnerable to punitive actions from the auto maker for having strayed off message. But CR’s impressions of the car, even months later, feels like vindication on some level.

Chrysler has graciously offered to let TTAC have another go at the Cherokee, and I’m slated to have my own re-test in April. It’s been my hope that these issues have been ironed out, especially after the costly delays that Chrysler implemented with the objective of improving the Cherokee’s transmission. They deserve immense credit for having the courage to do so. Whatever the outcome, you can be sure that we will refrain from The Wobble. We will continue to bring you The Truth About Cars.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 199 comments
  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Feb 13, 2014

    I drove one recently, (They are selling like crazy here, partly due to being made here) and I saw nothing to complain about. The 9 speed shifted ok, IMHO, and it drove fine, with decent power, and I saw nothing that screamed "CHEAP". The one I drove was loaded up, so a base one might be different. Not something I would buy, but I liked it whole lot better than the Patriot.

  • Myjeepcherokee Myjeepcherokee on Mar 09, 2014

    I see a lot of hatred of the Cherokee here, not just on the review of both parties TTAC and CR, but also the posts here. I guess that is expected when you are talking about a U.S. icon vehicle now owned by a foreign country. I see a lot of hatred based on the fact that this is not a street laden comfort ride, one to sit fat lazy people with mouths full of McD's and Ho-HO's, or that it is not an off road monster, one to fit the rich able to waste money or don't have any responsibilities in life other then the enjoyment of themselves. NOW THAT I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION! That is just a review of the critiques here right? No it's not a true or fair critique of anyone who wrote anything here, because I do not know you, the same goes for any vehicle review or opinion. If you do not own it and drive it daily for months you don't really have a clue. Well the truth is I own one of these Cherokee jeep's, I have owned Chevy trucks, RAV4's, 4runner's, Explorer's, Ford trucks and this exceeds the capabilities of each of them, meaning they each have certain aspects they are designed for and they do well but for what the Cherokee is designed for it does better in those areas then the other vehicles that I have owned. This Jeep is not meant to be a luxury road vehicle and it’s not meant to be an off road monster. This is a jeep, one for the people that want to drive to work, to the store, tow 6X8 trailers, go camping in remote areas (not rubber-stamp campsites), not worry about 6 inches of snow or none paved driveways when it raining. In the months I have had this jeep it has snowed, iced, rained and flooded never once has this jeep failed or hesitated to get me to where I wanted to go, passing those precious Subaru’s, CRV's and other so called all terrain vehicles. The truth is that the Cherokee must be scaring the people here; or your just lashing out because you bought an inferior vehicle and are stuck with it for several more years and can’t get a Jeep. For if you owned one of these you would see that this Cherokee is a jeep that goes on both road and off road better than anything else that is supposed to be able to do that, and it just may surprise you that for comfort,handling and reliability it has performed extremely well. So you all keep your anti JEEP comments coming and I along with all JEEP owners will just keep smiling as we pass by knowing that while we are sitting in comfort riding on this paved road, we can at anytime leave you in the dust as we go off road.

  • FreedMike Apparently this car, which doesn't comply to U.S. regs, is in Nogales, Mexico. What could possibly go wrong with this transaction?
  • El scotto Under NAFTA II or the USMCA basically the US and Canada do all the designing, planning, and high tech work and high skilled work. Mexico does all the medium-skilled work.Your favorite vehicle that has an Assembled in Mexico label may actually cross the border several times. High tech stuff is installed in the US, medium tech stuff gets done in Mexico, then the vehicle goes back across the border for more high tech stuff the back to Mexico for some nuts n bolts stuff.All of the vehicle manufacturers pass parts and vehicles between factories and countries. It's thought out, it's planned, it's coordinated and they all do it.Northern Mexico consists of a few big towns controlled by a few families. Those families already have deals with Texan and American companies that can truck their products back and forth over the border. The Chinese are the last to show up at the party. They're getting the worst land, the worst factories, and the worst employees. All the good stuff and people have been taken care of in the above paragraph.Lastly, the Chinese will have to make their parts in Mexico or the US or Canada. If not, they have to pay tariffs. High tariffs. It's all for one and one for all under the USMCA.Now evil El Scotto is thinking of the fusion of Chinese and Mexican cuisine and some darn good beer.
  • FreedMike I care SO deeply!
  • ClayT Listing is still up.Price has been updated too.1983 VW Rabbit pickup for sale Updated ad For Sale Message Seller [url=https://www.vwvortex.com/members/633147/] [/url] jellowsubmarine 0.00 star(s) (0.0) 0 reviews [h2]$19,000 USD Check price[/h2][list][*] [url=https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=1983 VW Rabbit pickup for sale Updated ad] eBay [/url][/*][/list] Ceres, California Apr 4, 2024 (Edited Apr 7, 2024)
  • KOKing Unless you're an employee (or even if you are) does anyone care where physically any company is headquartered? Until I saw this story pop up, I'd forgotten that GM used to be in the 'Cadillac Building' until whenever it was they moved into RenCen (and that RenCen wasn't even built for GM). It's not like GM moved to Bermuda or something for a tax shelter (and I dunno maybe they ARE incorporated there legally?)
Next