Tennessee Lawmakers Threatening To Kill Subsidies If UAW Wins VW Plant

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Should the United Auto Workers win the upcoming election to represent workers at Volkswagen’s Chatanooga, Tenn. plant, the automaker may find itself shunned by state lawmakers as far as further subsidies are concerned.

Volkswagen is seeking a new site this year to build their CrossBlue-based mid-size SUV in 2016, wooing both powers that be in Tennessee and Mexico for subsidies. However, Republicans in the Tennessee state legislature are threatening to back down on $580 million in state and local incentives the government offered to the automaker in 2008.

Tennessee House Majority Leader Gerald McCormick and state senator Bo Watson both said VW would have “a very tough time” attracting anymore tax dollars from the coffers should the UAW win representation, and while they were happy to have the automaker in their backyard, it didn’t mean they were ever given a “green light” to force unionization into the plant. They also criticized VW for giving union supporters an unfair advantage against anti-unionization lobbyists, a charge the automaker denied in a statement supporting the workers’ right to be approached by union supporters and opponents prior to the upcoming election.

Furthermore, VW also stated they would have recognized the UAW through a card check in lieu of an election, but insisted on the workers voting for representation to reflect the automaker’s belief that “democracy is an American ideal,” according to vice president of human resources Sebastian Patta.

Meanwhile, a spokesman for Governor Bill Haslam warned that the legislature would play a huge role in approving incentives to help fund the project — being too large for the state’s FastTrack incentive program as it is — and that the impact of UAW representation would affect the state’s ability to recruit other companies to the state.

Longtime UAW critic United States Senator Bob Corker originally remained mum on the upcoming vote, but after the union’s regional director Gary Casteel offered his praise of Corker’s statement by prompting other politicians to do the same in respect of the upcoming vote, the former mayor of Chattanooga felt the union was attempting to stifle other voices from commenting on the issue before stating that he would “return home [to] ensure [his] position was clear”: that the UAW would make VW “the laughingstock” of the automotive industry. Casteel fired back, calling Sen. Corker a flip-flopper prone to being swayed by special interests before restating his belief that UAW representation at the plant would improve the quality of life for both workers in the VW plant and everyone in Chattanooga.

Other critics weighed in on the election, such as the group called Southern Momentum, who quoted a factory worker leading the anti-unionization coalition at the plant as saying, “A vote for the UAW is a vote against the expansion of the plant, plain and simple.”

The election will take place from Wednesday to Friday of this week under supervision by the National Labor Relations Board. Around 1,500 workers will be eligible to vote during the three-day period.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 173 comments
  • Activeaero Activeaero on Feb 12, 2014

    The reason the states lawmakers are so upset is that this isn't simply a matter of worker choice. The UAW is set up in the VW HR offices (which are adorned with huge pro UAW signage) while anti-union voices have to wait by the front gates and grab employees coming and going. VW is very clear that they are pro union here. That stance wasn't clear to Tennessee lawmakers when they helped subsidize the construction of the plant. There is only one narrative the workers are hearing. If you want the SUV, you better bring in the union. There was an article in the Chattanooga Free Press that stated VW and the UAW have already agreed that wages will not be up for negotiation but of course dues paying would start immediately.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Feb 12, 2014

      "There was an article in the Chattanooga Free Press that stated VW and the UAW have already agreed that wages will not be up for negotiation but of course dues paying would start immediately." Sounds like zero incentive for the workers. Cui bono?

  • Turboprius Turboprius on Feb 12, 2014

    Before I made my commenting account, I remember reading that shocking post about Bertel being kicked out and the "New TTAC" coming along. Though all of us have our beliefs, the article stated that there would be no controversial pieces. Seven months later. Proven wrong.

    • See 3 previous
    • Turboprius Turboprius on Feb 12, 2014

      @Pch101 I think you brought up the point the best. I personally have said my views on unions before, and to prevent another rile-up, I refrained from saying anything about them on this highly heated and commented post. If the article was called "UAW is the Greatest Organization in the World and the Leader Shall Be Worshiped," I'd be upset, and that would be upsetting for most of the other commenting people. This, however, says that the UAW could completely bring down a plant that produces one of America's most popular vehicles. I understand what you, Racer, and VC mean, and I now agree. Thank you.

  • Bkojote @Lou_BC I don't know how broad of a difference in capability there is between 2 door and 4 door broncos or even Wranglers as I can't speak to that from experience. Generally the consensus is while a Tacoma/4Runner is ~10% less capable on 'difficult' trails they're significantly more pleasant to drive on the way to the trails and actually pleasant the other 90% of the time. I'm guessing the Trailhunter narrows that gap even more and is probably almost as capable as a 4 Door Bronco Sasquatch but significantly more pleasant/fuel efficient on the road. To wit, just about everyone in our group with a 4Runner bought a second set of wheels/tires for when it sees road duty. Everyone in our group with a Bronco bought a second vehicle...
  • Aja8888 No.
  • 2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
  • Cla65691460 April 24 (Reuters) - A made-in-China electric vehicle will hit U.S. dealers this summer offering power and efficiency similar to the Tesla Model Y, the world's best-selling EV, but for about $8,000 less.
  • FreedMike It certainly wouldn't hurt. But let's think about the demographic here. We're talking people with less money to spend, so it follows that many of them won't have a dedicated place to charge up. Lots of them may be urban dwellers. That means they'll be depending on the current charging infrastructure, which is improving, but isn't "there" yet. So...what would help EV adoption for less-well-heeled buyers, in my opinion, is improved charging options. We also have to think about the 900-pound gorilla in the room, namely: how do automakers make this category more profitable? The answer is clear: you go after margin, which means more expensive vehicles. That goes a long way to explaining why no one's making cheap EVS for our market. So...maybe cheaper EVs aren't all that necessary in the short term.
Next