Barclay's Report Confirms TTAC's Story About F-150 Aluminum Difficulties

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Automotive News is reporting that assembly plants in Dearborn and Kansas city will be shut down for a total of 13 weeks as it retools to switch production to the all new F-150 pickup truck that has an aluminum body. The launch of the 2015 F-150 will be closely watched, as Ford and its competitors see how consumers accept the lighter, more expensive truck.

Meanwhile, an analyst report seems to confirm TTAC’s initial story that Ford was forced to delay production of the new truck by up to three months due to difficulties with the new aluminum body.


Brian Johnson, an analyst with Barclays Capital, noted that

“There has already been a delay in the production schedule, likely due to challenges in stamping, riveting, and welding of the aluminum,” Johnson said in a report published earlier this week. “Moreover, Ford also faces risks with regard to potentially higher warranty expense and customer acceptance (large pickup buyers may be resistant to change, and may be skeptical of the new truck’s durability).”

The success of that launch will have a significant impact on FoMoCo’s 2014 profits. In 2013, F series trucks (which include the heavier duty pickup lineup that starts with the F-250 and runs through the F-650 medium duty truck) represented 31% of Ford’s light vehicle sales . Morgan Stanley estimates that the F series accounts for 90% of Ford’s global profits.

The increased downtime for the F-150 launch might lower Ford’s North American pretax profit by $800 million this year, according to Buckingham Research Group analyst Joseph Amaturo.

It’s not just a question of how they start making and selling the new truck either. Ford needs to manage production and inventory of the outgoing model if they want to maximize profits. The automaker needs to build up a large enough inventory so that when the plants shut down dealers are not affected. At the same time it doesn’t want to accumulate too many, leading to discounts and incentives.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 118 comments
  • Mikein08 Mikein08 on Jan 30, 2014

    Quote from the article: “There has already been a delay in the production schedule, likely due to challenges in stamping, riveting, and welding of the aluminum,” Johnson said in a report published earlier this week. “Moreover, Ford also faces risks with regard to potentially higher warranty expense and customer acceptance (large pickup buyers may be resistant to change, and may be skeptical of the new truck’s durability).” When I worked in IT, we called this sort of thing "testing in production". You know, you make a big change to something, you try to test it as best you can, but the ultimate tests come when the change goes into production simply because you can't - or don't or won't - imagine all the possible permutations of problems that will occur. So, Ford truck buyer beware: you're going to be a tester for Ford. It looks like they've not ironed out all the problems yet - any maybe they don't have any idea what the problems are going to be. But Ford will find out, at buyers's expense.

    • DeadWeight DeadWeight on Jan 30, 2014

      AKA Beta Testers AKA Guinea Pigs AKA Early Adopters But hey, it's not as if the F Series is a vehicle line that represents 90% of Ford's global profits*, so there's that. *Or as Pch101 would put it, "ut it wouldn't account for 90% of Ford's global profits IF Ford could only make a much higher % profit on its other vehicles, especially ones sold in Europe.

  • Z71_Silvy Z71_Silvy on Jan 30, 2014

    Ford really bit off more than they can chew. So far this has been a disaster...and there's no appreciable difference in going with aluminium. 700 pounds ON YOUR HEAVIEST MODEL is a joke. Especially when your competition is already 500 pounds lighter. So a net savings of 200 pounds is just not worth this hassle. They could have saved that by making the F-120 a 1/2 ton truck again...and not a bloated turd.

    • See 1 previous
    • Z71_Silvy Z71_Silvy on Jan 31, 2014

      @Kinosh You are completely missing the point. And GM has already done it--years ago. Their trucks are far lighter than the POS imitation trucks Ford peddles.

  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]