Overstating MPGs May Cost Hyundai & Kia $395 Million in Proposed Settlement

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America have agreed to pay as much as $395 million to settle class action lawsuits filed after the Korean automakers overstated fuel economy ratings on about 900,000 vehicles sold in the U.S. Hyundai’s share will be as much as $210 million while Kia will have to pay up to $185 million, according to statements issued by the companies and reports by Automotive News. The settlements must still undergo court review, expected early next year.

The lawsuits were filed after the companies disclosed in November of 2012 that approximately 600,000 Hyundais and 300,000 Kias from the 2011, 2012 and 2013 model years were sold with EPA fuel economy ratings that weren’t accurate. The U.S. EPA relies on testing results provided by car companies. At the time of the announcement, Hyundai and Kia officials apologized blaming flawed internal testing procedures for the overstatements. Eight models were affected and most consumers say the combined MPG ratings of their cars fall by one or two miles per gallon.

Over 50 lawsuits have been consolidated into a single case being handled in federal court in Los Angeles and the dollar figures work out to an average lump sum payment of ~$353 to the affected Hyundai owners and ~$667 to each affected Kia consumer.

John Yoon, attorney for Kia Motors America, said in a statement: “Kia Motors is a responsible company, and the proposed settlement enhances our goal of making things right for our customers by providing new reimbursement options. Kia Motors is fully committed to taking care of its customers, and today’s settlement adds flexibility by adding lump-sum payment options to the transparent reimbursement program introduced last year.”

The actual amounts paid out will depend on how many owners choose to receive lump sum payments. The owners also have the option of continuing to participate in the existing reimbursement program Hyundai and Kia started back when their vehicles’ fuel economy ratings were restated. Current and past owners participating in the reimbursement program receive debit cards to compensate them for the extra gasoline that they’ve had to buy.

“Customers responded favorably to the original reimbursement program,” W. Gerald Flannery, general counsel for Hyundai Motor America, said in a statement. “Today’s settlement is designed to provide them with an option, again intended to make customers fully whole for Hyundai’s fuel economy ratings restatement.”

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 12 comments
  • This whole MPG thing is so stupid. No car gets the advertised MPG simply because no 2 drivers drive alike, the same distance, the same route or haul the same amount of mass. My cars get 10.1 miles per gallon on a good day but their stickers claim 14 city. Is that an overstatement?

    • See 6 previous
    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on Dec 26, 2013

      @Ion EPA is easy when you are driving and not using your car as a rolling office. We loaded up the Malibu LTZ(2012 3.6l with 8K miles) with 3 people, 70 lbs dog, and trunk packed with presents and was seeing 31-33 mpg at 65 mph for 450 miles. The car is rated at 26 mpg highway. The tire psi was up to 38 psi but the ambient temperatures were in the teens F most of the way. I'd have to verify the trip computer with hand calculation to see how optimistic it is, but pretty sure EPA was eclipsed.

  • Rmwill Rmwill on Dec 26, 2013

    Hyundai committed MPG fraud. Big difference from gaming the system.

  • IBx1 Everyone in the working class (if you’re not in the obscenely wealthy capital class and you perform work for money you’re working class) should unionize.
  • Jrhurren Legend
  • Ltcmgm78 Imagine the feeling of fulfillment he must have when he looks upon all the improvements to the Corvette over time!
  • ToolGuy "The car is the eye in my head and I have never spared money on it, no less, it is not new and is over 30 years old."• Translation please?(Theories: written by AI; written by an engineer lol)
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
Next