Brazil Imposes New Safety Standards As Consumers Fork Out More, While VW Gets A Pass
The Brazilian auto industry has been on edge for a week and a half, as the Economic Ministry announced that the mandate for airbags and ABS on all Brazilian cars in 2014 was “under review”. Citing worries over inflation (as car prices make up an infinitesimal part of that complex calculation) and the fact that auto sales were down, the Economic Ministry said that the 2014 adoption of the aforementioned equipment might not be in Brazil’s best interest.
According to industry sources, the government expressed worries that the measure would increase vehicle prices anywhere between 1,000 and 1,500 reais per car. In turn, the OEMs put pressure on their suppliers to lower costs, so that the OEMs could maintain a healthy profit margin while keeping the price increase to around 500 reais, allowing them to adopt a posture that showed them as both safety oriented and caring about the consumer.
Although the safety mandate passed, an exemption was granted for the VW Kombi, which will remain in production.The Kombi is still made by hand in Brazil, and our sources tell us that they are among the highest paid auto workers in Brazil, and highly protected by the auto worker unions. In addition, the Komni’s precarious existence means VW is reluctant to train anyone to build the Kombi – they just keep the old timers around instead.
As late as a month ago, it appeared that the Kombi was finally set to die, and VW launched a final edition that cost 85,000 reais (roughly, $37,000), a sum VW happily pocketed. Now, with this announcement, VW can keep on making the Kombi, at estimated profit margins of around 80 percent.
The end result is more profit for the OEMs, and good PR for both the unions and the government. On the other hand, Brazilian consumers get the raw end of the deal.
More by TTAC Staff
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Dukeisduke Is the Volvo EX30 even on sale yet? It was pulled from the NACTOY awards because they were having software problems with the vehicle.
- Wjtinfwb If you've only got 5k to spend on transportation, I cannot imagine a worse way to spend it than on a GM orphan from Sweden that's 15 years old with 150k on the clock and limited plus expensive parts availability and dwindling techs who'd even want to work on it. Go find a similar vintage Camry or Accord with 150k miles or even a Ford or a Chevy, whatever. Hell, even an old Jaguar is less of a crapshoot than a Saab. At least you can still get parts.
- Kwik_Shift Brands that were considered from China include BYD, Dayun, Great Wall Motors, Maxus, Nio, Omoda/Chery, Seres, XPeng, and Zeekr. KG Mobility from South Korea also made the list of candidates.That's a lot of car companies from there ready to head here.
- Analoggrotto Clean sweep and unanimous victory for the world affluence engine of 22nd century : Hyundai/Kia/Genesis. Toyota and Lexus, for 120 years of history have not been able to capture the zenith superlative status of Hyundai Motor Corporation the most awarded, decorated and revered automotive corporation in the history of historical. Featuring best ever, first ever and greatest ever e-ATPs the Hyundai Genesis Kia lineup is posed to become the envy of every country club, ivy league college and fortune 500 corporation in the world. I've been taking a roadtrip in my loaner Elantra N, visiting colleges from east to west, elite universities of higher learning to inspect their parking lots. WHat did I find? Leagues of Genesis models, outnumbering Lexus 3 to 1. When I interviewed faculty and staff at these places of greater learning, their response was unanimous : they chose HMC for the ATPs.
- Mikey 2019 Chevy Impala Premier FWD with 20 inch factory Bridgestones. I'm looking at replacing tires at the 65,000 KLM's (40,000 miles ) mark ....It doesn't thrill me .. I'm pricing Michelin Cross Climate 2 tires ouch !! ..Up here in Canuckastan ....Big $$$$$
Comments
Join the conversation
Is the market so awful that for $37K there is no better alternative than this relic of 50 year old technology?
Seems pointless to push this regulation. Obviously if its still being made then people are still buying it, despite the lack of safety equipment. Obviously anyone who buys it is aware if its shortcoming, if they worried about safety then they have other choices. To demean this vehicle because of what it lacks, you may as well argue that the model T is dangerous because you can get a splinter from it.