TUV Nord Testing Firm: Direct Injected Gasoline Engines Emit More Particulates Than Diesels

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

TUV Nord, a safety testing and certification agency, has issued a report commissioned by an environmental group that says that modern engines that use gasoline direct injection (GDI) of fuel emit more small particles in their exhausts than modern diesel engines. Particulates raise concerns over possibly causing cancer. GDI has proliferated as a means of increasing power, improving fuel efficiency and lowering CO2 emmissions but TUV Nord says that GDI engines put out 1,000 times more harmful particles than traditional gasoline engines and 10 times more than the latest diesels. The study is based on a sample size of three cars, a Ford Focus with a 1 liter EcoBoost engine, a Renault Megane with a 1.2 liter Energy TCe, and a Hyundai i40 with a 1.6 liter GDI engine.

“The cost of a filter to eliminate particle emissions from GDI cars is low (around EUR50 [~$68 US]), with no loss in fuel efficiency and a big societal benefit. Despite this, carmakers are delaying fitting filters on GDI cars,” the Transport & Environment advocacy group based in Brussels said in a summary of the report.

Greg Archer, clean vehicles manager at Transport & Environment, said, “Cars are the largest source of air pollution in Europe’s cities and 90% of European citizens are already exposed to harmful levels of particle pollution. Carmakers’ reluctance to install cheap particle filters on GDI engines means that society as a whole has to pay the cost through more ill health.”

EU laws currently require particulate filters to be fitted to all new diesel cars but there is no requirement for gasoline powered cars. All of the cars tested by TUV Nord showed particulate emissions from GDI engines exceeding the 2017 European emissions limits, Euro 6. Fitting particulate filters reduced the number of particles in the exhaust by a factor of ~2,000, with results similar to those found in unpolluted air.

“More fuel-efficient, lower CO2 GDI engines would be a great innovation if they did not emit harmful particles. These particles can be eliminated for the price of a hands free kit. It’s time for carmakers to act responsibly and make petrol cars less polluting overall,” Archer said.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Charliej Charliej on Nov 30, 2013

    Do Gas direct injection engines control combustion temperature with exhaust recirculation like port injected engines? As far as I know, the combustion temperatures are no higher in a GDI engine than in a port injected engine. GDI engines generally have a higher compression ratio than port injected engines. This allows cramming in more fuel and air per stroke, but would not necessarily result in higher combustion temperature.

  • Shaker Shaker on Nov 30, 2013

    But think about the similarity between diesels and GDI engines: The fuel is injected into highly compressed, hot air just before ignition; with the port injected engine fuel is essentially "mixed" with cool, low pressure air on the intake stroke. These differences are likely enough to cause aggregation of some compounds into non-flammable (or poorly burned) particulates. Disturbing that this was never revealed.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next