Junkyard Find: 1965 Triumph Spitfire

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

By far the most numerous British sports car in junkyards these days— and, in fact, for the last few decades— is the MGB. We’ve seen many of these cars in this series, but today’s find is just the second Junkyard Find Spitfire, after this ’75. The Spitfire had a long production run, 19 years total, but Spitfires just weren’t anywhere near as sturdy as their MGB cousins and most of the non-perfect examples got crushed long ago. Still, every so often a forgotten project gets evicted from a garage or back yard, and that’s probably what this happened to this battered ’65 that I spotted in a San Francisco Bay Area self-service yard last month.

The Mark 2 Spitfire was built for the 1965 and 1966 model years and was replaced by a version with a 1296cc engine instead of just 1147cc.

There’s not much demand for tiny pushrod engines these days, nor is anyone likely to buy these cute little SU carburetors.

Many, many years in the California sun for this car.

It doesn’t seem very rusty, but Spitfires just aren’t worth enough to make this one worth restoring.

These cars like to break axles, so perhaps some Spitfire owner will pull the ones on this car.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • ExPatBrit ExPatBrit on Nov 26, 2013

    That car doesn't look that bad really It's a round tail which worth a little more. I have seen worse cars than that restored. I have a 76, very basic car and easy to work on. For 76 they upped the CR so remove the smog junk, add a header, twin SU's or a Weber and they don't have problems keeping up. The optional overdrive is nice but I never drive it on he freeway anyways. Most of the problems I see are due to the extra components that were added to the car in later life to keep it federal compliant or make it more marketable. Removing much of that bogus junk keeps it simple. Parts are easy and "cheap as chips" , the nice thing is switches, and stuff like heater valves etc can often be disassembled and repaired. The car will will never be at Pebble Beach, so originality is not really an issue either.

  • And003 And003 on Dec 02, 2013

    Spitfires may not be worth enough to make this one worth restoring, but I wonder ... what if this Spitfire was given the restomod treatment? Such a project could be along the lines of something like this: http://www.britishv8.org/Triumph/MikeReynolds.htm

  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
Next