Volkswagen USA Doesn't Want A Union, But Workers Will Get The Final Say

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

More drama in the ongoing Volkswagen unionization fight in Chattanooga: Volkswagen USA is not keen on the union, while Volkswagen’s management board is divided on the matter. One thing that seems certain is the prospect of a secret ballot vote on the union, according to Reuters.

TTAC readers are familiar by now with the drama over organization drives, union cards, and the like. But the report by Ben Klayman and Bernie Woodall (to veteran reporters with solid contacts at VW) is the first look at VW’s mindset, and the differing opinions both in the USA and Germany. Per Woodall and Klayman

While VW’s U.S. executives are hostile to the United Auto Workers, the eight-member management board may still ask the union to help set up a German-style employee board at the Chattanooga plant, said the person, who asked not to be identified.

The top executives feel that any final decision must be approved by the workers in a secret ballot to protect VW’s reputation and assuage investors and U.S. politicians, said the source, who did not identify the VW executives.

Beyond the weighty issue of union organization by the UAW at a foreign plant in the south is whether Chattanooga will get additional product. VW dealers are hungry for a crossover to take on vehicles like the Chevrolet Traverse and Honda Pilot, and Chattanooga is a proposed location for the car. But the vehicle (based on the CrossBlue concept, above) has become the center of a game of tug-of-war for both pro and anti union camps, who variously want to see the car built there or in Mexico for a whole host of reasons, including punishing Chattanooga for not recognizing the UAW (or alternately, rewarding it for doing so) or taking advantage of the cost savings and building it in Mexico, while conveniently skirting the UAW issue at the same time.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 24 comments
  • Billfrombuckhead Billfrombuckhead on Oct 12, 2013

    Unions have nothing to do with Detroit's troubles. Labor has very little to do with the price of a car, let alone the designs and mergers. It wasn't the UAW that designed the Vega or the Citation. The UAW had nothing to do with the failure of Ford's "Premium Luxury Group" or Explorers rolling over. It wasn't the UAW behind the disastrous merger of equals"oft Chrysler and Daimler. In fact, the UAW did much to help the Saturn and Neon projects. It's easy to regurgitate rightwing talking points but they really have no basis in reality. Much of this anti-UAW sentiment is simply disguised racism. Remember that MLK's "I have a Dream" speech was first given at Detroit's Cobo Hall at a joint NAACP/UAW rally.

  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Oct 12, 2013

    @billfrombuckhead You Say; Unions have nothing to do with Detroit’s troubles. Labor has very little to do with the price of a car, let alone the designs and mergers. I Say; Well you had better see how the auto industry in Australia is not viable because of high wages. Have a look at how the UAW support(ed) all of the uncompetitive work practices, tariffs, regulations, etc. The UAW is as bad a the Big 3 managers for accepting the UAW mismanagement and poor decisions. On decision making I give the UAW a 2 out of 10. I suppose reality and accepting accountability isn't a strong point for a unionist, it's always someone else's fault.

    • See 5 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Oct 13, 2013

      @BAFO - I've coined a term for the Aussie auto industry/market. I call it the “Galapagos Effect”. Charles Darwin had it correct.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next