Piston Slap: Escaping The Land of Lotus-Eaters

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Susan writes:

So I found a 2011 Saab 9-5 that I just love. I have never owned a Saab. Do they break a lot? I don’t want to spend thousands on car repairs. Been there done that. Please let me know what your honest opinion is on whether I should buy this car or not. Thanks for your time.

Sajeev answers:

Run like hell. That’s the short answer. More to come. :)


Sent from my iPhone

Susan answers:

Hahaha ok


Sent from my iPhone

Sajeev concludes:

Here’s the thing: I truly adore it when readers make no pretense to their mechanical prowess (I can do this, I think I’d be willing to do that) and instead get to the point with a Yes or No question…with past experiences in mind. That makes my answer far more accurate. Why?

Consider these:

  1. Turbo Saabs are chronically below average in terms of reliability, durability and repair costs. While a 2011 model may be far superior than older models with unobtainium non-GM parts and (possible) questionable upkeep from previous owners, while parts are available via the “ Saab Secure Program“, only certain parts of the country are truly Saab friendly when it comes to service and support. Not so compared to other luxury marques.
  2. Saabs aren’t for everyone and like any niche, plenty of folks appreciate such quirkiness…and are willing to deal with non-Lexian levels of quality.
  3. The final Saab 9-5 is a rather beautiful and unique automobile, even with the Chevy steering wheel and underlying GM architecture.
  4. Saabs (and Volvos) probably have the best seats in the business, for decades. But what are those seats bolted to?

We know enough to make a sound judgement against a pretty vehicle with serious concerns: if one readily admits to being repair-averse, don’t even consider a Saab. Hell, maybe you shouldn’t consider anything from Europe (without a very extended warranty) these days. Make your life easier, there are plenty of alternatives out there. Just go test drive them, Susan!

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 49 comments
  • 95_SC 95_SC on Oct 21, 2013

    Oh what the hell!

    • See 1 previous
    • Bill h. Bill h. on Oct 22, 2013

      @invara Definitely a YMMV situation. We've got four Saabs in our family fleet (six over the past 25 years). Bought both new and used, including one that had 120k miles when we got it (as 2002 model, now with 185k miles). Haven't had problems like any of yours, nor any issues with turbo related failures, Sajeev's cautions notwithstanding. We've replaced our share of ignition cassettes, done a couple of fuel pumps, a head gasket (120k miles) and a couple of clutches. No transmission failures, but the automatics are Japanese and only need regular fluid changes. And our newest one, a 2009 9-3 wagon, is the best/most reliable car we've owned of any make, with nearly 50k miles and no issues since new. The Saab parts company never went bankrupt and is still operating. That said, making sure one has a good tech around who isn't afraid of a NG9-5 is going to be a requisite for keeping such a car for years in the future.

  • Jimbob457 Jimbob457 on Oct 23, 2013

    During its 60 years of shadowy existence, the auto maker of Trollhatten consistently established the global standard for engineering weirdness - good once in a while, but mostly bad. This may be interesting for some, but NOT for the average used car owner. Three points: 1. For years they virtually epitomized turbo lag. 2. For years, the torque steer in their high-powered models was so extreme as to be downright dangerous. 3. In the end, all they had to do to stay in business was follow the instructions from their dullard corporate masters at GM. They didn't do it.

  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
  • Chris P Bacon "Dealership". Are these traditional franchised dealers, or is Vinfast selling direct?
  • Chris P Bacon Full self driving is a fraud. Even aircraft "autopilot" requires pilot interaction, attention, and most importantly of all, training is required. We've already seen accidents by idiots who think they don't need to interact with their Tesla. The system gets confused by simple lane markings, and there are many more variables driving down the street than there is in a jet aircraft.
  • ToolGuy I read through the Tesla presentation deck last night and here is my take (understanding that it was late and I ain't too bright):• Tesla has realized it has a capital outlay issue and has put the 'unboxed' process in new facilities on hold and will focus on a 'hybrid' approach cranking out more product from the existing facilities without as much cost reduction but saving on the capital.They still plan to go 'all the way' (maximum cost reduction) with the robo thing but that will be in the future when presumably more cash is freed up.
Next