Harry Metcalfe Leaves Evo For Jaguar Land Rover

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Long time Evo writer Harry Metcalfe has left the magazine to work for Jaguar Land Rover, in a role that is the dream of journalists everywhere: helping to develop halo versions of their current and future model range.

A frequent meme on TTAC (at least when you see my byline) is the denigration of what I call the armchair product planning brigade, the peanut gallery cohort who insist that OEMs import diesels, build station wagons and equip every car with a manual transmission. It’s easy to call for these kinds of cars without an understanding of the auto market and the economic and regulatory realities that underpin it. It’s not an exaggeration to say that TTAC helped open my eyes to them.

In my brief career as an auto writer, I have had the privilege of seeing what really goes into automotive product planning. Before I had any understanding of how the industry worked, I thought it was simply a cabal of guys and girls who liked to sit and talk about cars and decide on what would get built by the car company. In other words, it seemed like the best job in the world. Little did I realize how difficult and exacting the job really is.

My estimation of the profession has only increased as I’ve had more access to that side of the industry. It is a job that requires attention to detail, hours of Excel spreadsheets, and endless presentations to senior management. Everything must be justified on an economic basis to finance people who want to do things for as little money as possible.

All in all it is an essential job that most people who discuss cars on the internet tend to believe they could do better. Personally, I’m not so sure I could. But Harry Metcalfe seems to have, against all odds, landed that dream-like version of the Product Planning gig, the one where someone is paying you to act as a visionary for a range of high-performance luxury cars. Best of luck to Harry and Jaguar Land Rover.


Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 16 comments
  • GiddyHitch GiddyHitch on Oct 10, 2013

    "It is a job that requires attention to detail, hours of Excel spreadsheets, and endless presentations to senior management." Therein lies the rub, if you assume that senior management actually knows what they are doing. This design by committee and death by a thousand cost cutting measures results in middling products that inspire lust in exactly no one and remind you of their cheapness or questionable design decisions constantly. Product planning is definitely more difficult than the average internet commenter gives credit, but it's also more difficult than it needs to be given the dysfunctional bureaucracies that seem to run car companies these days. I once sat in a meeting at Ford reviewing the plan for the protective wrap during the transport of a low volume new vehicle. Just a small piece of the huge effort it takes to launch a new car, but not one that should require the 50 people in attendance!

    • See 2 previous
    • GiddyHitch GiddyHitch on Oct 11, 2013

      @Jeff Weimer I would have been a lot more engaged had it been the GT but that came later. This was to be Ford's highest end model (as opposed to variant) for a time and only appealed to the AARP demographic. Jacques was running the show during development. I would hope that things would have changed under Mullaly but I am no longer in that industry. GM made Ford look downright lean and efficient in comparison at the time, and based on their decisions over the past decade, that most likely is the case today (i.e, GM is still orders of magnitude more dysfunctional than Ford).

  • Lie2me Lie2me on Oct 10, 2013

    I don't know if I would want the responsibility of the development of a "halo" car. If you get it right you're a genius hero, get it wrong and you're a Bangle Butt

  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
  • ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
Next