Court Order May Finally Get Chicago EV Charging Network Fully Operational

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

After a ruling in federal court, a Chicago area electric vehicle charging network may finally become completely operational. The quick charging stations were installed under a $1.9 million federal grant, but two contractors who installed them for the network’s original owner, 350Green, had been locked in a legal battle over ownership of the system.

The court ruled that the charging stations be turned over to JNS power, an Arlington Heights based electric contractor which had installed about 40% of the stations. The other contractor, Car Charging Group, based in Florida, said that it would appeal the ruling. 350Green had made deals with both companies earlier this year to take over the charging stations. The city of Chicago had terminated it agreement with 350Green last April when allegations surfaced that the company fraudulently submitted evidence of payments made to contractors that were not in fact paid. In July, the company’s officers were the subject of a FBI search.

Of 219 charging stations scheduled to be installed under the program, 51 remain uninstalled. Those stations that were installed have been abandoned while the legal battle over who owns them has continued. Some work, some don’t, and some are the subject of contractor liens. Some stations that work, can’t be used because you can’t buy one of the cards needed to use them.

JNS said that it will be moving the project forward as soon as possible. An attorney for JNS said, “Our client is obviously satisfied with the court’s decision and the expedited nature by which the court rendered its decision. JNS is looking forward to getting this federally funded city project back on track to provide an efficient network of car charging stations to the entire Chicago metropolitan area.”

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Sep 26, 2013

    I'm curious as to who'd use a public charging station. 1. Most public chargers are Level 2, which at 18 mph takes a long time to inhale a meaningful charge. 2. Most EV drivers charge at home, and stay within their battery's driving radius. I wouldn't depend on some distant charger to get to my destination. 3. The best way to charge a Tesla in the wild is with their Supercharger network. See #1 above. This isn't that. 4. Pay-for-charge is very costly. My electrons cost $0.06/kWh. I'm not interested in paying multiples of that. 5. Chicago politics/business. Uh huh.

  • AJ AJ on Sep 28, 2013

    Sounds kind of like to me a city bus stop. The idea is nice, but there is never a bus stop close enough to where I'd want to get on and as well get off the bus to work for me. Last thing I'd want to do is to have to drive around with a nearly dead electric car looking for an available charger. I think I'd do that at home... But hey, it's just borrowing money from China to pay for it! Who cares?!

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next