2014 GM Pickups First to Earn NHTSA Five-Star Rating

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration stiffened its testing procedures in 2011. General Motors has announced that for the first time since those stricter standards have been in place its 2014 Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups have earned overall vehicle scores of five stars, the first fullsize pickup trucks to earn that rating. The 2014 Ford F-150 and 2014 Ram 1500 from Chrysler have four-star overall ratings. NHTSA hasn’t yet released the rating of Toyota’s new 2014 Tundra, scheduled to go on sale in late August, but the 2013 Tundra received four stars from NHTSA as did the outgoing 2013 GM trucks.

Gay Kent, GM general director of Vehicle Safety and Crashworthiness, said in a statement, “Safety is as important to truck buyers as it is to car buyers. Silverado and Sierra set a benchmark for pickup truck safety by offering a full array of advanced features designed to protect occupants before, during and after a collision.”

Before NHTSA instituted more rigorous testing, almost 90% of models received four or five star ratings for side impacts and 95% were ranked with 5 stars after frontal collision testing. Those figures dropped after the new standards were implemented.

In addition to new passive safety features like lap belt pretensioners, six standard air bags (including new dual stage frontal air bags), fully boxed frames and the use of high strength steel in critical areas, GM’s new pickups, the source of much of the company’s profits in its home market in the U.S. offer other optional safety upgrades like backup cameras, forward-collision alert, lane-departure warning, and a haptic safety-alert driver’s seat.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 70 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Aug 22, 2013

    doctor olds - point taken in relation to safety but that is as far as I will agree."The also offer class leading power and fuel efficiency." I'm sure that the 5.7 Ram and 3.5 Ecoboost engineers would disagree. One can also throw in the 5.0 Cummins and 3.0 Ecodiesel. But hey, marketing types will point out that 2 of those engines are diesels and the EB3.5 is a V6. If one looks at the specs carefully, the only engine GM is trying to beat with the 5.3 is Ford's bread and butter V8, the 5.0. It does that but then again, the EB 3.5 is Ford's biggest seller. So which engine are you going to compare to the 5.3? It all depends on which payroll your PR department sits. We can't talk about the new Chevy 6.2 because it hasn't been released yet. It will easily beat the Ford 6.2 but I suspect that the Ford 6.2 will be dropped from the F150 lineup and rot away in Super Duty trucks and industrial vehicles. The 6.2 Chevy never did sell well and for the most part has been GMC's "ringer" in all of the truck shoot outs. Send the engine that no one really buys. Next - that new 4.3. It isn't out yet. Again, which V6 do you compare it to? The Pentastar V6 will most likely beat it in mpg but probably not torque. If GM marketing types avoid comparing V8's to the EB 3.5, does it mean that it is fair game to compare it to the 4.3? After all, they are both V6's. Like I said earlier, the only bar GMC raised was for GMT800 and GMT900 owners.

    • See 3 previous
    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Aug 22, 2013

      @doctor olds The DI is a big step for the GM engines. The higher compression ratio it allows directly increases thermodynamic efficiency. The new truck is rated 2 MPG, or almost 12% better than the 2013. EPA fuel economy estimates are simply derived from emissions test results. The FTP (Federal Test Procedure) is a loaded dyno test that never achieves true highway speeds. I think the max is 50 something, don't recall exactly. The EPA estimates have been modified and tweaked in attempt to bring them closer to what real owners achieve, but they may not always be representative, as you note. All fair enough. Every maker works very hard to achieve top results and GM's new trucks are better in that test. They will have to be tested in real use to confirm whether that superiority is borne out on the road.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Aug 23, 2013

    @doctor olds - I do like the new GM siblings and in a years time (once the newbie bugs get worked out of them), I'd probably chose one if I had to replace my 2010 F150. I'd go with the Sierra as it is a muscular evolution of the GMT900. The Silverado was very attractive to me at first and was my preferred pick of the two but after seeing more of them, I have 1987 flashbacks. I think that was the retro look they wanted with the 2014 Silverado. I don't have any warm and fuzzy feelings over the EB3.5. There seems to be two camps forming with that engine. Both camps love the power but one camp says the empty mpg sucks and the other camp says the empty mpg is great. It is highly dependant upon how you drive it. Call me conservative, but a V8 seems to be the best choice for a pickup and as you have pointed out, GMC sure knows how to come up with a good blend of HP and MPG. I like the fact that GMC added a 6.5 box to the crewcab line up. 5.5 is just a balcony.

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Aug 23, 2013

      @Lou_BC- I like the Sierra, too. I have never really been a truck guy, but I like my '08 Sierra. At $22,000 "out the door", ($13,000 off!) it was a hard deal to turn down. The only failure in 5 years- driver's power door lock. It apparently was the result of a supplier problem involving grease/material choice. Fortunately, a buddy put a couple in for me. I love the truck. It is roomy and comfortable. Z71 may make it sit higher, I don't know, but it is a little high. I miss BIG cars! On the other hand, fuel economy is not great compared to a car. It is a very inefficient way to haul just myself around. I have the luxury of a few choices of vehicle. When I want to pull or carry something the Sierra is wonderful. I have to stay away from the new truck, I expect the engine torque and responsiveness to be a leap from the last gen, and I already like that a lot!

  • Mikey My late wife loved Mustangs ..We alway rented one while travelling . GM blood vetoed me purchasing one . 3 years after retirement bought an 08 rag top, followed by a 15 EB Hard top, In 18 i bought a low low mileage 05 GT rag with a stick.. The car had not been properly stored. That led to rodent issues !! Electrical nightmare. Lots of bucks !! The stick wasn't kind to my aging knees.. The 05 went to a long term dedicated Mustang guy. He loves it .. Today my garage tenant is a sweet 19 Camaro RS rag 6yl Auto. I just might take it out of hibernation this weekend. The Mustang will always hold a place in my heart.. Kudos to Ford for keeping it alive . I refuse to refer to the fake one by that storied name .
  • Ajla On the Mach-E, I still don't like it but my understanding is that it helps allow Ford to continue offering a V8 in the Mustang and F-150. Considering Dodge and Ram jumped off a cliff into 6-cylinder land there's probably some credibility to that story.
  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
Next