Spotted In Detroit: Global Ford Ranger

by Derek Kreindler

Published: July 16th, 2013

An eagle-eyed reader sent us pictures of this Ford Global Ranger on the streets of Detroit. Reader bball40dtw claims that this version is “set up for diagnostic testing”. Nevertheless, don’t hold your breath. This thing is apparently 90 percent of the size of an F-150 and the price points are too similar.

#Ford #FordRanger #GlobalRanger #PickupTrucks #Trucks

Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments

Join the conversation

13 of 67 comments

Summicron on Jul 16, 2013

Unless they offer a regular cab/6' bed it's just another SUV to me. Today we went out and bought a 67" tall bookshelf and took it to my wife's office. Did it with a Rio5 and several bungees. This truck could not do the same without dropping the gate. Useless beyond its nice ground clearance.

Like Reply
Thelaine on Jul 17, 2013

I would love to see some competition for the Tacoma. It is a nice truck, but I don't think Toyota puts much money or thought into it, year to year, since it pretty much has the segment to itself.

Like Reply
- See 10 previous
- Big Al from Oz on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @thelaine We all know the reason driving it. Imagine if Apple phones attracted no tax, but every other brand was hit with a 25% tax. I think Americans would be pissed off.
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @Big Al from Oz Yeah Big Al, all the comparison talk is really academic. Get rid of the tax (and CAFE while they're at it) and then let the buyers decide for themselves. There is no legitimate justification for the tax.
  
  Like
- DenverMike on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @thelaine - All the complaints of the Tacoma are silly. And you can't deny it's a great truck! If anyone was that into the small truck fetish, they would deal with all its supposed "shortcomings". The problem is no one is lining up to buy small trucks "new". Except for US cheapskates, fleet and other bottom feeders that demand rebates on already low margin trucks. When the small truck market started to slide, OEMs were all-in. Mazda, Mitsu, Isuzu, Ford, Nissan, Toyota, Dodge and GM. All these little trucks were as good as any on the planet of ANY SIZE!!! If the 'tax' is easily skirted, is it really a factor? Was it EVER a factor? Could the '80s mini-truck craze/fad/invasion been any bigger?
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @DenverMike Maybe you are right DenverMike. I have always followed your arguments with our AUS friends with great interest. However, regardless, what is the justification for the tax? How can it be defended? Why not get rid of it? Whom does it protect? Who is behind it and why? Why can't it be repealed? Are you in favor of higher taxes on consumer goods? What is the justification for this tax? It has been around for a hell of a long time. What was its purpose? Will it ever die? Why can't it be killed? Let's kill it and kill CAFE and see what happens. Why would you oppose that?
  
  Like
- RobertRyan on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @thelaine, One thing that annoys me is Taxes placed on Automobiles as is if they are not expensive enough.
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Jul 17, 2013
  
  @RobertRyan I do believe we are being sheared, Mr. Ryan, for the benefit of others.
  
  Like
- DenverMike on Jul 18, 2013
  
  @thelaine - I'm not in favor of the tax or any tax. Or CAFE. That's a different argument though, but in the meantime, the Chicken tax is here but basically impotent. It's a nominal amount, after the loophole workarounds. No different that the 2.5% tax on import cars. Both should be killed off, but both cost OEMs only hundreds of dollars per vehicle. My question to you is, why doesn't anyone make an equal stink about the tariff on import cars? Neither tax are prohibitive for viable and desired foreign vehicles that would sell in decent numbers. Same with regulations. Then why doesn't anyone cry about all the French, Italian and Soviet, Chinese, etc, cars missing from the US market? Surely they would all be here if it wasn't for all those pesky US tariffs and regulations, right? Oh and why doesn't the EU 10% tariff on autos and 22.5% tariff on trucks (no loopholes) get any airplay?
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Jul 18, 2013
  
  @DenverMike I cannot answer that DM, but you will find me to be tediously consistent in my opposition to tariffs, corrupt tax deals, taxpayer bailouts, subsidies for favored corporations and handouts to connected interest groups. This includes auto companies, agribusiness, unions, "alternate" energy scam corporations, electric car nerds, homeowners, petroleum companies, public employee vampires, social service welfare parasites - you name it. These protective tariffs should be eliminated. All tariffs named after farm animals would be as good a place to start as any.
  
  Like
- DenverMike on Jul 18, 2013
  
  @DenverMike Protective by definition, but do US tariffs actually protect US vehicles? And from what? It'll be interesting to see if Australia drops its 5% tariff on all import vehicles once they no longer produce vehicles to protect.
  
  Like
- Big Al from Oz on Jul 18, 2013
  
  @thelaine I don't know if you read the piece/s I wrote a week or so ago concerning Australia in the HSV article. It's the same view I hold against any nation. But you are very correct about any form of subsidisation. This is what has killed the 'West', not just America. Like you stated might as well start with animal names then words in French that sound like coffee.
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Jul 18, 2013
  
  @Big Al from Oz Big Al, I have followed damn near every one of your comments re small pickup imports to the US, but don't know to which article you are referring. Any link will be followed.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.