We're Not Getting The Holden Ute, But Not For Reasons You'd Expect

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Every so often, the same tired rumor will pop up again, like a particularly resilient pimple that habitually reappears in the same conspicuous spot. Thanks to the incessant hunger for clicks among auto websites, these rumors refuse to die, no matter how asinine they are. How many times have you seen a “BREAKING” or “EXCLUSIVE” story on the next Toyota Supra or some absurd BS fabrication regarding a diesel Mazda MX-5?

The latest round of bollocks concerns the Holden Ute, another car that tickles the fancy of enthusiasts on all sides of the globe, but would be a commercial nightmare if they ever tried to export it to America. One Australian publication is now claiming that a guerilla marketing campaign showing Mark Reuss lapping the Nurburgring in a brand new Ute is part of a ploy to export the Ute to America. Of course, other car blogs have been lathering themselves up into a frenzy over the prospect of a very expensive quasi-pickup that they will not purchase once it gets here.

Holden claims that there will be some kind of major announcement regarding the Ute next month. I’m going to be the first to say it will not be related to any Ute exports. There are two simple reasons here: the US-Australian dollar exchange rate is abominable as far as exports are concerned, and there is likely little to no demand for a very pricey product that is neither fish nor fowl. Who is going to pay $50k for Corvette powered pseudo-pickup wearing a Chevrolet badge. Did we discuss the UAW’s reaction to an Australian built pickup, or the whole “cannibalizing GM’s new ‘lifestyle pickup’ thing “either? Both of those matter, but would require their own articles to really get into.

One thing that is not a factor is the chicken tax. Not long ago, Holden used the chicken tax as an excuse for why it’s been unable to export Utes to America. TTAC commenters soon produced plenty of evidence showing that Australian cars and “light commercial vehicles” (i.e. pickups and Utes) can be brought to America duty free. So that excuse is out. I feel for Holden though. The Australian domestic car industry is going down the tubes, their signature product is about to become just another boring front-drive appliance and all they want to do is send some good product to world markets.

The problem is nobody wants it. No matter how loud the internet cries out for it.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 125 comments
  • DrLou DrLou on Jul 04, 2013

    I disagree with the author of this article. I do believe there is a desire for an Ute/El Camino type vehicle in NA, however not at the current asking price. If Holden, or whatever OEM, built a Ute-type pickup and had a base price of around $17K, I think it would sell well as long as it had RWD, performed well in crash tests, could haul 4 x 8 sheets and had good MPG. If a 2.0-2.2 liter diesel was offered as an option to increase MPG and low-end torque I believe there would be a very large market for such a truck. The problem is GM is about to launch 2 mid-size pickups in NA to fill the life-style niche so I doubt GM would also spring for an El Camino because it would be competing against itself.

  • Racer-esq. Racer-esq. on Oct 30, 2013

    Compact car based Utes, like the old VW Caddy/Dodge Rampage, or a number of vehicles currently on the market in Latin America, make a lot of sense. They are very cheap to produce, and with a durable enough twist beam rear suspension most of them can handle at least a ton. I can easily see one being sold in the US for $15K MSRP or less, made in Mexico. Taking an expensive to produce rear wheel drive, IRS sedan and making a pickup out of it is a joke. Australia being an expensive to produce in country doesn't help, but even if Commodore based Utes were being made in a low cost country like Thailand regular pickups would make more sense. The Camaro, basically the same as a Ute, starts at $23,555, so that's about what a base Ute would cost if it was built in Canada instead of Australia (with Australian labor costs and shipping the base UTE would likely cost $30,000+ in the US, even though there is no Chicken Tax with Australia). For $23,590 you can get a Silverado.

  • KOKing Unless you're an employee (or even if you are) does anyone care where physically any company is headquartered? Until I saw this story pop up, I'd forgotten that GM used to be in the 'Cadillac Building' until whenever it was they moved into RenCen (and that RenCen wasn't even built for GM). It's not like GM moved to Bermuda or something for a tax shelter (and I dunno maybe they ARE incorporated there legally?)
  • Fred It just makes me question GM's management. Do they save rent money? What about the cost of the move? Don't forget they have to change addresses on their forms. New phone numbers? Lost hours?
  • SilverHawk It's amazing how the domestic manufacturers have made themselves irrelevant in the minds of American consumers. Someday, they'll teach this level of brand disassociation in marketing classes as an example of what "not to do". Our auto interests once revolved around these brands. Now, nobody cares, and nobody should care. Where did I put the keys to my Studebaker?
  • El scotto Will it get GM one mile closer to the Gates of Hades? This is a company that told their life long employees not to sell their stock until the day of bankruptcy.
  • 28-Cars-Later I'm curious, is the Maverick in "EV mode" when its towing?"There's still car-like handling -- no punishment because you're driving a truck." That's because its not a truck, its akin to the earlier Ranchero - a literal car-truck hybrid now with an available gasoline hybrid drivetrain (that's actually hilarious and awesome, hybrid-hybrid FTW).
Next