Ford F-150 Tremor Vs Ram Express: Battle Of The Standard Cabs

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

The standard cab, short bed pickup is a rare breed these days. Most trucks that leave the dealer lot tend to be an extended cab, if not a four-door crew cab, with a longer bed and all the bells and whistles typically seen on a luxury vehicle. For a couple years, Ram has had the monopoly on a hot version of the standard cab with the Ram Express, a Hemi powered no-frills Ram, which starts at just $23,400. Not anymore.

Today, Ford announced the introduction of the F-150 Tremor. Silly moniker aside, the Tremor is a standard cab short bed truck that is explicitly aimed at “sport truck” enthusiasts. I always thought that crowd died away with the mini-truck era, but the combination of a 3.5L Ecoboost motor and a 4.10 rear axle ratio is an enticing one – don’t expect it to get anywhere near the vaunted fuel economy numbers that the taller-ratio equipped cars are apparently capable of. Power for the EcoBoost remains unchanged at 360 horsepower and 420 lb-ft of torque, while the car gets FX4-style black alloy wheels, Boss 302-esque graphics and some loud paint hues.

The Express is pretty much as different as it gets. Rather than the newfangled EcoBoost, there’s an old-fashioned Hemi V8 breathing through dual exhausts. The fancy 8-speed ZF auto available on other Ram models is not available, nor is the big UConnect touch screen or any sort of “soft touch” interior. It’s all black plastic and the most basic head unit, with a 6-speed automatic as the sole gearbox. Outside, it’s indistinguishable from any other mid-grade Ram. No badges, no stripes, no alloys. You can even get it in a crew cab if you want, though this pushes the price up another $10,000.

What would you take?

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 89 comments
  • George B George B on Jun 29, 2013

    I'd be more likely to buy the Ram Express with my own money. It retains most of the regular cab pickup truck virtues with great V8 engine sound. However, I'm not entirely sold on the idea of low-profile tires on a pickup truck. Gives up too much of the bad road/mild off-road capability on a vehicle that will never take advantage of a short sidewall. People who only drive on smooth paved roads will probably never understand why so many pickup trucks are sold.

  • Jftjr1982 Jftjr1982 on Jan 13, 2014

    I'd take the Ram over the Ecoboost any day. The F-150 Tremor is a cool truck but I'm passed the point in my life where I want something that sporty. I want something reliable that I can do some light to moderate hauling, has a V8, gets decent gas mileage, 4 wheel drive, and can handle itself off road from time to time. I have no use for something with 4.10 gears. The gas mileage with that gear ratio is horrendous. I also would never trust a turbo charged gas engine and would never buy one. They don't last. I know it's not a Ford, but my Fiance has a turbo charged Volkswagen Beetle and we've had nothing but problems with it, (mainly with the cooling system) and every where we've taken from the dealer to different mechanics have said the same thing, "That's a turbo engine for ya." and no one wants to work on it unless you pay them an arm and a leg. The bottom line is unless you're buying a diesel, turbo charged engines are unreliable.

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next