Could The American Military Fund An Advance In Electric Cars? Should They?

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Behold! The American military electric vehicle! Also known as the Columbia ParCar, it’s part of a broad-based Department of Defense program to purchase off-the-shelf NEVs and electric cars for non-tactical use. Seems like a very reasonable idea; in case of war, gasoline might be required for other things like fighter jets and napalm.

After reading some details of Zero Motorcycles’ 2013 range of two-wheeled electric vehicles, however, I’m wondering if there isn’t more that infamous military-industrial complex could be doing to make the next generation of Nissan-Leaf-a-likes more useful.

Zero Motorcyles’ latest press release regarding the Zero MMX mil-spec two-wheeler notes that

“It was a very rewarding experience for the Zero team to go through such an exacting development process. The military needed a very specific set of core features on the MMX, and we were incredibly thankful to work side-by-side with them to deliver such a unique product,” said Abe Askenazi, Chief Technology Officer for Zero Motorcycles. “The great news for our civilian customers is that we made the decision to incorporate into our 2013 MX, FX and XU retail motorcycles virtually all of the powertrain enhancements associated with satisfying this project’s stringent military requirements. Our 2013 product is truly ‘military grade’!”

No doubt this press release is no more connected to actual reality than, say, any given sack of alphabetic vomit from Bentley that talks about the Mulsanne’s “upscale appeal” but fails to mention that it looks like the kind of fish you’d find five miles beneath the surface of the ocean, but it leads to what might sound like an odd or awkward question to be asking in 2013: Why isn’t the military taking an active role in the development of advanced electric cars? After all, NASA might have brought us everything from TANG to the transistor radio with a helping of Omega Speedmaster on the side, but the agency’s fallen on hard times due to the average American’s inability to get too excited about space flight while working two McJobs during the day and performing amateur oral surgery on the neighbors in the evenings.

The US military, on the other hand, seemingly never runs out of places to invade and/or advise. Couldn’t some of that be done with electric vehicles? In the relatively short space of four years in WWII, the parties involved went from the Brewster Buffalo to the Messerschmitt 262. Once the war was over, all anybody could manage was a Messerschmitt KR200. Obviously, war is an excellent stimulus to R&D.

One of the qualities that worries potential purchasers of the Zero Motorcycles more than almost any other — the bike’s eerie silence — is actually an advantage in a military context. By the same token, perhaps the painfully inoffensive shape of modern hybrids could be used to lull our enemies into complacency. Think of it. One minute the so-called “insurgents” are laughing at a Prius with a “Coexist” sticker making its way up a mountain pass, the next minute they’re meeting the deities of their choice courtesy of a fifty-caliber round to the dome. Or we could use specially-prepared Tesla roadsters that are designed to catch fire in a riff on the old “Divine Wind” program.

The possibilities are endless… but if involvement with the military made the 2013 crop of Zero Motorcycles better, why hasn’t GM asked soldiers to drive the Volt? Oh, that’s right…

…the Geneva Convention.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Jun 18, 2013

    Money isn't spent by the military for general science R&D - only for projects that contribute to a military mission. If there are civilian applications down the road that's a fringe benefit. Behind the lines they're already using electric utility vehicles for tasks around the base, not much to R&D there, but there is serious work being done developing hybrid drives for Humvees and larger tactical vehicles. The military is virtually gasoline-free, everything now runs on either diesel or jet fuel, often interchangeably.

  • Toshi Toshi on Jun 18, 2013

    Quantum CERV. It exists, and is documented on YouTube. I don't recall if it or another similar one was utilizing four wheel motors.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next