By on May 30, 2013

Picture courtesy

Fiat can’t wait for a full merger with now again cash-rich and profitable Chrysler, but it will wait until its legal dispute with the UAW’s VEBA healthcare trust has been resolved. “We intend to wait for the Delaware verdict before moving forward on the merger” with Chrysler, Fiat Chairman John Elkann told Reuters.

“The verdict is due 90 days from the April 25 hearing,” Elkann told Reuters. Elkann did not rule out an out of court settlement with VEBA ahead of the verdict, which will help determine the price of the 41.5 percent stake in Chrysler held by the trust.

Elkann said Fiat was not planning to spin off luxury sportscar maker Ferrari to finance the takeover. He did not mention Alfa. Elkann said the new company’s name would include both Fiat and Chrysler (FiatChrysler anyone?), and that Sergio Marchionne will stay on past 2015 to run the combined group.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


6 Comments on “Fiat To Merge With Chrysler When VEBA Case Solved...”

  • avatar

    At least this European knows how to share (properly). Not sure how much of the 300 was Daimler besides the suspension and transmission, but that’s about the only DaimlerChrysler product that actually worked (in terms of function and profit).

    Third time’s the charm i guess, after Renault and Daimler’s dances with the (American) devil (Chrysler).

  • avatar
    bumpy ii

    Renault? Chrysler picked up the remnants of their tie-up with AMC (some of which eventually made its way into the 300), but I don’t think the two ever played pattycake themselves.

    • 0 avatar

      That’s right. Renault was a minority (eventually plurality) shareholder in American Motors from 1979-1987 and the dominant player in that ill-fated alliance (the plans were originally to phase out the AMC brand name entirely and use Renault on all passenger cars and keep Jeep on the light trucks). Renault sold their 49% stake to Chrysler and quit the US market, and Chrysler then bought out all of AMC’s remaining shares and absorbed the company. Interestingly, the corporate structure actually remained intact for a time. After the takeover, American Motors was renamed “Jeep Eagle Corporation” and continued to exist on paper as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chrysler Corp., until the Daimler takeover a decade later.

  • avatar

    This time, the name should be ChryslerFiat. Not like the last time when it was DaimlerChrysler. Sergio also needs to change his name to Steve.

  • avatar

    Maybe Chrysler/boat-anchor? Fiat (the Industrial conglomerate) should have sold off the Fiat auto group brands piecemeal, and retired the Fiat auto nameplate, instead of licensing the name the way Saab did. Any auto company needs a strong home base, Italy can’t support a home car industry any more than Spain, England or France. The Eurozone could, but it’s dominated by the Germans.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • ClutchCarGo: Towing is lucrative and quite tempting to authorities: http://www.chicagotribune.c...
  • ash78: Wait, you’ve seen someone over the age of 20 driving a CLA? :P
  • Proud2BUnion: Now Mitsubishi just needs to bring back the “Sign and Drive” program , with no payments for...
  • ash78: If only there a more upstanding entity to take Faraday Future’s place in this deal. Maybe North Korea...
  • notwhoithink: “Until then, it said it would shift its business strategy “to position the company as the leader...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States