The Self-Driving Car's Nose Sneaks Into The Parking Garage's Tent

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

My annual pilgrimage to the New York Auto Show reminded me of just how much hassle it can be to park in the world’s most important city. (It’s the world’s most important city because it is the setting for the HBO show, Girls). For people who are not wealthy and/or well-connected, simply finding a place to dump a car off for a day or so can be fraught with drama. Not only are most Manhattan garages well into the $45-a-day zone, that price doesn’t get you any of the things most Americans take for granted in a parking spot — in/out privileges, access to their vehicles to drop off shopping items or pick up a change of clothes, or even a half-hearted hope that they might be able to leave a valuable item in the trunk. I wound up leaving my rented 2013 Caravan jammed up into a not-a-space in the Port Authority Bus Terminal’s garage, walking a few miles each way to the Village to see a couple of musicians perform, and begging the Port Authority cops to let me have my car back at three in the morning.

Things will get worse in the world of urban parking before they get better… but what if you could fix most of these issues at a reasonable cost?

MIT Technology Review has an overview this week on self-parking cars. No, not self-parking cars like the current crop of Ford Flexes and Escapes, but cars that are capable of intelligently driving themselves to a parking spot deep in the labyrinthine hellholes that pass for parking garages in major cities. Imagine simply pulling up to an intelligent garage in your intelligent Audi or Toyota or whatever and handling over control to the garage systems. Your car would drive to the appropriate area and shut itself down, packing itself as tightly as mechanically possible. When you needed it again, you could simply request that it come back out, at which point you could, say, toss that Ovation 1991 Collectors’ edition you’d been hoping to play a few newly-learned Fleet Foxes songs on during your time in a hotel that you never actually saw because you were out all night instead back into the trunk. Following said Ovation’s dropoff you could then go about your business like a pair of stormtroopers.

This sort of this will absolutely be the proverbial camel’s nose in the proverbial tent because it renders all the conventional objections against self-driving cars completely moot. You aren’t surrendering your freedom of the open road to a faceless machine; you’re leaving your $100,000 car in its own competent care rather than in the hands of two scar-faced Russian emigres with no idea how to drive a manual transmission. You aren’t expecting it to deal with complicated traffic issues or potential collisions at freeway speeds; instead, it’s free to trundle around at a walking pace. It can’t accidentally hurt anyone, as the garage shouldn’t have any people in it to begin with.

Only the cost is an issue, and that cost will surely drop as time goes on and more processing power is thrown at what should honestly be a simple problem. The Infiniti Q50, to name an early example, already has all the hardware required to electronically direct itself; it only needs a brain.

Imagine it: the freedom to drive into any city in the world, hand your car off to a garage, and enjoy safe, secure, lower-cost storage for however long you require it. Yes, it will once again sharply bifurcate the urban population into people who can afford the technology and those who cannot, but at $44.75 a day, haven’t the ninety-nine percent already been forcibly invited to take the train?


Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • David42 David42 on Apr 01, 2013

    That's a fantastic idea, Jack. Though I'm paranoid about letting a machine take the wheel while I'm in the car, I'd be perfectly happy to let it putter around on its own among other like-minded machines. Maybe the garage's central brain could send the car some coordinates for a parking space, and it would hibernate there until it had to rearrange itself to allow others to exit. You could probably double the amount of parking spaces in a given garage, not to mention convert other buildings into parking structures that might not otherwise be tolerable for human drivers.

  • ClutchCarGo ClutchCarGo on Apr 01, 2013

    So I'm trying to imagine rush hour, with literally dozens of drivers looking to drop off and/or pick up their cars while the autopilot creeps slowly around the garage, taking, what, 7-8 minutes per car? Yeah, that's going to be popular.

  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
Next