Cars That Look Good But Aren't

Doug DeMuro
by Doug DeMuro

There’s nothing worse than discovering that an attractive woman (or man, I won’t judge) has a bad personality. Picture it: you meet someone. You hit it off. You exchange numbers. You go home and excitedly search for your new object of interest on Facebook. You find their profile. And then … you discover multiple uses of the word “YOLO.” Ouch.

This is, of course, also true in the automotive world. It’s sad when you’re captivated by a car at an auto show, then at a dealer, then on the road, and then – when you finally go test drive it – you discover it’s awful in every way. These are a few of my favorite cars that look good but aren’t.

1991-1994 Ford Explorer

The ’91-’94 Explorer is the single best-looking SUV ever made. I know this because I recently polled everyone in my immediate vicinity on the issue, and it went like this:

Doug: Yes, the Explorer is the best-looking SUV ever made.


My neighbor: Not home.

Obviously, this poll has some problems. But so did the Explorer. I won’t go into the transmission troubles, or the wheel hub issue. I won’t even touch on the lack of rear headrests or that awful two-spoke steering wheel. I’ll just say this: the ’91-’94 Explorer offers minimal protection from a dinosaur attack. Despite these issues, there are still quite a few first-generation Explorers on the road. Life, uh… life finds a way.

1991-1996 Infiniti G20

I love the first-generation G20, and I recommend it to everyone who comes to me and says “I have four thousand dollars to buy a car, what should I get?!” Usually, they ignore my suggestion and somehow end up with a late-model Prius. But the G20 was small and underpowered, and most have been driven into the ground by people who actually only had four thousand dollars to buy a car. Still: it was absolutely handsome. Especially in Gran Turismo 2.

Virtually Any Land Rover

Man, Land Rovers look cool. I have one, and when I drive down the road, I roll the windows down and blast music so people look at me and think: Wow, that guy looks cool. I know they think this because they jealously honk at me while I’m texting all my friends (on my iPhone 5, duh) because I’m so popular. YOLO!

OK, I don’t do any of those things. I mean, occasionally I roll the windows down, but usually just because the air-conditioning has broken. And that’s the problem: while Land Rovers look like they’re ready for safari, or at least parking on the grass when all the legal spots are taken at the mall, they’re actually only capable of electrical malfunctions. And no one looks cool standing on the side of the road.

1999-2003 Mitsubishi Galant

I always felt that Mitsubishi really got midsize sedan styling just right with this car. Everything was well-proportioned. The narrow grille made it look sporty and cool. There were some decent wheel designs. Honestly, it looked like a poor man’s BMW.

Unfortunately, it drove like a poor man’s Mitsubishi, which is already a poor man’s Nissan, which itself is a poor man’s Toyota, and I could continue this forever until I’ve offended the owners of every single car brand except Rolls-Royce. So I’ll leave you with this: when equipped with its optional V6 (which went into less than a quarter of cars), the ’99-’03 Galant did 0-60 in about nine seconds. That, ladies and gentleman, is a poor man’s engineering team.

1995-1997 Volkswagen Passat

The ’95-’97 Passat was a handsome car. That was important for Volkswagen, because people certainly weren’t going to buy the Passat based on its merits. Those included a 115-horsepower four-cylinder that propelled the cars up hills, according to Volkswagen; a 172-horsepower V6 that – most days – was not on fire; a 90-horsepower diesel that propelled the car nowhere, but got 40 mpg while doing it; and, most importantly, a dashboard without a glovebox. (Their reasoning was probably: “If Porsche can do it, so can we,” forgetting, perhaps, that Porsche doesn’t consider its first model year to be a “testing period.”)

2004-2007 Volvo S60R

The Volvo S60R just screams “tremendously attractive.” Those huge wheels; those chiseled shoulder lines. The decision to sell the first few in Flash Green until the acid wore off at the factory.

The problems start when you look at the badge. And deal with the reliability nightmare that was the car’s Haldex all-wheel drive system. And, worse, when you drive the dog that was the S60R Automatic. As a result, the best way to enjoy an S60R is from the privacy of your own home on a late-night AutoTrader.com search with a bag of chips. Or possibly a dealer test drive – as long as it’s a stick shift. Just don’t sign anything. Especially if it’s Flash Green.

OK, folks: you have my nominations. What do you think are some of today’s most attractive cars that aren’t very good?

Doug DeMuro operates PlaysWithCars.com. He’s owned an E63 AMG wagon, road-tripped across the US in a Lotus without air conditioning, and posted a six-minute lap time on the Circuit de Monaco in a rented Ford Fiesta. One year after becoming Porsche Cars North America’s youngest manager, he quit to become a writer. His parents are very disappointed.

Doug DeMuro
Doug DeMuro

More by Doug DeMuro

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 206 comments
  • Mvoss Mvoss on May 01, 2013

    People will hate me saying this, but I test drove an S2000 and was really underwhelmed. For a car that gets so much raving, it was extremely cramped and the gear ratios are so close that you hit 6th gear and 3000 rpm at 45 mph. That means it must hover around 4500 rpm on mild highway speeds.

    • Bumpy ii Bumpy ii on May 01, 2013

      Naah, 3000 in 6th is about 55. 4000 is around 70. I'm a lean 6'2" and I have juuuust enough room. It's definitely not a car for the thicker folk.

  • Fluxcapacitor Fluxcapacitor on Jul 11, 2013

    Doug--you forgot about the 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer. Great styling. Not much else.

  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
  • 28-Cars-Later "The VF 8 has struggled to break ground in the increasingly crowded EV market, as spotty reviews have highlighted deficiencies with its tech, ride quality, and driver assistance features. That said, the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200 with leases at $429 monthly." In a not so surprising turn of events, VinFast US has already gone bankrupt.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years."Ford death watch starts now.
  • JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. As long as it costs under $42k that is totally within our budget. The average cost of a new ICE car is... (checks interwebs) = $47k. So EVs are already in the "affordable" range for today's new car buyers.We already have two other ICE vehicles one of which has a 6.2l V8 with a manual. This way we can have our cake and eat it too. If your a one vehicle household I can see why an EV, no matter the cost, may not work in that situation. But if you have two vehicles one can easily be an EV.My brother has an EV (Tesla Model Y) along with two ICE Porsche's (one is a dedicated track car) and his high school age daughters share an EV (Bolt). I fully assume his daughters will never drive an ICE vehicle. Just like they have never watched anything but HiDef TV, never used a land-line, nor been without an iPad. To them the concept of an ICE power vehicle is complete ridiculous - you mean you have to STOP driving to put some gas in and then PAY for it!!! Why? the car should already charged and the cost is covered by just paying the monthly electric bill.So the way I see it the EV problem will solve itself, once all the boomers die off. Myself as part of Gen X / MTV Generation will have drive a mix of EV and ICE.
  • 28-Cars-Later [Model year is 2010] "and mileage is 144,000"Why not ask $25,000? Oh too cheap, how about $50,000?Wait... the circus is missing one clown, please report to wardrobe. 2010 AUDI A3 AWD 4D HATCHBACK PREMIUM PLUS
Next