Volkswagen Shows The Car It Did Not Want You To Have: The Golf GTI

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When I helped Volkswagen launch its Golf GTI in 1976, Volkswagen wanted to make only 5,000. They wanted to make even less, actually, but 5,000 were needed for homologation as a racer. Volkswagen was convinced that no mentally stable person would be nuts enough to buy a little car like that with a 110 hp engine. Boy were they ever wrong. It took well into the 80’s for the Golf GTI to come to America. When I said “Americans love muscle cars,” the answer was: “Haven’t you heard? 55 miles an hour.” Wrong again. Today, Volkswagen shows the seventh generation of the archetypical hot hatch. at the Geneva International Motor Show.


With 220 hp, it has twice the power of the first GTI. For the first time, you can have even a little more. The GTI Performance comes with 230 hp and a front axle differential lock. Both are powered by a turbocharged gasoline direct-injection engine (TSI).

In Germany, advance ordering for the new Golf GTI begins on the 5th of March. Prices start at 28,350 euros.

Facts overview:

Market launch in Europe: Initial markets starting May 2013.


Debut of first generation Golf GTI: 1976.


Engine: Four-cylinder TSI (turbocharged direct petrol injection); front transverse engine; displacement 1,984 cc; bore/stroke 82.5/92.8 mm; compression ratio 9.8:1.


Power: 162 kW / 220 PS from 4,500 to 6,200 rpm.


Torque: 350 Nm from 1,500 to 4,400 rpm.


Gearboxes / drive type: Manual 6-speed gearbox; automatic 6-speed DSG; front-wheel drive.


Brakes: Disc brakes front and rear, front 312 x 25 mm, ventilated; rear 300 x 12 mm.


Fuel consumption / CO2 emissions (manual): 6.0 l/100 km;


139 g/km CO2.


Driving performance (manual): 0-100 km/h in 6.5 s; V/max 246 km/h.


Unladen weight: 1,351 kg (base version including driver [68 kg], luggage [7 kg] and 90 % filled fuel tank; calculated as per RL 92/21/EEC.

GTI Performance:

Power: 169 kW / 230 PS from 4,700 to 6,200 rpm.


Torque: 350 Nm from 1,500 to 4,600 rpm.


front axle differential lock (VAQ).


Brakes: Disc brakes front and rear, front 340 x 30 mm, ventilated;


rear 310 x 22 mm, ventilated.


Driving performance (manual): 0-100 km/h in 6.4 s; V/max 250 km/h.


Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 94 comments
  • Fordson Fordson on Feb 27, 2013

    The MK7 looks a lot like the MK6, but that's OK with me - the MK6 started out looking good. They got the weight of the GTI sans fuel and driver down to just over 2800 lbs.? That's stunning - nobody gets a weight reduction like that anymore. It's pretty commonly known the current 200 hp/207 lb/ft GTI makes around 205/220 at the wheels. VW always does this - the new 220 hp and 230 hp engines will easily make that at the wheels.

  • Charlie84 Charlie84 on Feb 27, 2013

    Is anyone else just over-the-moon about the weight reduction here? Seriously, if they kept everything the same from the Mk6 and ONLY reduced the weight by such an amount, they'd probably have my money. Combined with an an optional LSD? They've nailed it. This has everything I could reasonably want in a daily driver.

    • See 1 previous
    • Charlie84 Charlie84 on Feb 27, 2013

      @dts187 Right. There's virtually nothing here that's not to like. They took the car we already like and just made everything 10% to 20% better.

  • Grg These days, it is not only EVs that could be more affordable. All cars are becoming less affordable.When you look at the complexity of ICE cars vs EVs, you cannot help. but wonder if affordability will flip to EVs?
  • Varezhka Maybe the volume was not big enough to really matter anyways, but losing a “passenger car” for a mostly “light truck” line-up should help Subaru with their CAFE numbers too.
  • Varezhka For this category my car of choice would be the CX-50. But between the two cars listed I’d select the RAV4 over CR-V. I’ve always preferred NA over small turbos and for hybrids THS’ longer history shows in its refinement.
  • AZFelix I would suggest a variation on the 'fcuk, marry, kill' game using 'track, buy, lease' with three similar automotive selections.
  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
Next