By on January 24, 2013

image

From the press conference:

Toyota and BMW to collaborate on

- Joint sports car (joint technology, separate design)
- Lightweight technology (carbon fiber, also for sports car)
- Lithium air battery (air, not ion )
- Fuel cell

Electric power train DROPPED from the list.

More to come …

6 Comments on “BMW And Toyota Collaborate On More Than Just Hydrogen...”


  • avatar
    redav

    Toyota seems to be pressing the sports cars lately. It is probably a strategy to pollinate lessons learned onto the rest of their line up, because I don’t see the Toyota brand directly benefiting from multiple sports cars.

    Unless we find a raw hydrogen source (e.g., new gas wells with high volume fraction H2), fuel cells are a waste in cars. Even with all their current limitations, batteries are superior, and I don’t expect improvements in fuel cell tech to outpace improvements in batteries enough to change that.

    • 0 avatar
      Luke42

      Hydrogen is just an alternative battery chemistry, and needs to be evaluated as such, because the energy to move both cars is going to come from the same place.

      Then there’s availability.

      Hydrogen cars have been a pipe dream that’s just a few years away since I was a kid in the 1980s.

      But I can go down to my local Nissan dealer and buy an EV with a lithium-ion battery. I test drove it and liked it a lot, especially for its NVH and low-end torque (as far as happy little commuter cars go). Huge astoundingly significant point to lithium-ion for actually existing on the retail market.

      I’m guessing that either Nissan or Tesla will make my next ride. Our Sienna and our Prius are both keepers and they’re likely to last until I can afford a Tesla.

  • avatar
    Luke42

    How about partnering with Toyota on reliability?

    A BMW with Toyota-class reliability would at least mean that I wouldn’t give up something that I value by look at a German cars. OTOH, the business school cases I’ve read suggest that Toyota’s work-culture has as much to do with it as their engineering and their manufacturing.

    The company that needs to do this even more is Volkswagen. They’re the people’s car, and the people aren’t trying to show off how rich they are (were) by owning a car that is expensive to maintain.

    • 0 avatar
      Synchromesh

      The day Toyota partners up with BMW to produce anything is the day I’ll cross of Toyota off my list.

      Toyota is trying to shed it’s beigemobile image which is good. Otoh, BMW makes nothing but overpriced crapwagens. There is no need to dilute BRZ with extra fat, unreliability and huge markups.

      • 0 avatar
        Summicron

        Beigemobile reliability is what most of us want from a car, especially those of us over 50 for whom Japanese reliability came like a sunrise with trumpets in the 80′s/90′s.

        Toyota understands the Bell curve better than anyone right now. I’m happy to be their average customer. And they’re huge enough that a little niche-dabbling like this BMW thing is innocuous.

      • 0 avatar
        Luke42

        I’m fine with beige, just so long as it comes with well engineered practicality.

        Plus, Toyota sells so many cars that whatever they do will be the new beige.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1983 Dodge Rampage Prospector

    55_wrench - My boss had one for a light delivery vehicle in ’82, and it was a blast to drive. Free revving, great acceleration (have to remember the...
  • Re: Henrik Fisker Called, He Wants His Company Back

    gslippy - Growing pains? Fisker essentially repackaged the Volt drivetrain in a vehicle that is less reliable (how many fires and breakdowns?), more...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Jaguar XJ 3.0 AWD

    danio3834 - ” I still can’t look at one without being reminded of RoboCop.” Yes! These have 6000 SUX written all over them. A British tradition?
  • Re: The Day The Blue Team Dropped The Ball

    bball40dtw - Well then Scottdude, everything just got ruined. I like your alternative Ford product line better than the current. So this prior to Mullaly selling all...
  • Re: Holden Sticking With Australia Despite High Costs

    th009 - With the disappearance of the Falcon, there might yet be enough sales to build another V8 RWD Commodore …
  • Re: Capsule Review: Jaguar XJ 3.0 AWD

    danio3834 - “When I can buy the shell from a junkyard in a few years do you think a LS-X engine would fit?” LS engines fit in everything. Practically a bolt...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Jaguar XJ 3.0 AWD

    danio3834 - For what it’s worth, cathodic protection acutally works on boats. I’m not sure if that might have been employed on the vessels in question.
  • Re: Snow Drifting

    Thomas Kreutzer - I bought mine about a decade later. My brief experience with Kazu and this car is one of the reasons I knew what it was when I found it. At the time (around 1992) I had a...
  • Re: Capsule Review: Jaguar XJ 3.0 AWD

    danio3834 - “Jeep Cherokee? Interior no where near as good as a RR.” Both interiors appear top notch to me. I can’t really point at anything that says...
  • Re: The Day The Blue Team Dropped The Ball

    Scoutdude - This was after the Mustang got DEW’ed. The US versions of the Large Sedans were supposed to be hitting, or in, the dealerships around now and the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Clemens Gleich, Germany
  • Doug DeMuro, Atlanta
  • Phil Coconis, Los Angeles
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India
  • Michael Karesh, Detroit