By on November 14, 2012

A while ago, I chatted with an industry executive who had “done time” (his words) at GM. I asked him how that was, and he said: “There is always that talk about the current Big Deal that will bring the company back to its former glory. When that Big Deal fizzles, it’s on to the next Big Deal.” A formerly Big Deal is fizzling in Europe.

As we reported yesterday, General Motors and PSA have put the brakes on a broader alliance. Allegedly after PSA accepted financial assistance from the French government, as Reuters says, which broke the story. GM’s stock price immediately changed course southwards, because the consequences  can be enormous..

You have a right to be curious why GM, itself no stranger to government assistance, suddenly can’t stand it when an alliance partner receives a much smaller alm from a sympathetic government. As so often, the ostensible reasons mask the true ones. Not to our surprise, Financial Times Deutschland heard from its informants that the couple has irreconcilable differences, and GM is begging for a reason to get out. Says the FTD:

“The French are disappointed about the alliance with GM: PSA hopes for financial assistance for their expansion into growth markets such as China. All GM is looking for is a partner to help them with the rehab of GM’s problem child Opel. The alliance is at the end of its rope.”

Isn’t it always like that: The girl dreams of a log lasting future, of travel to far away lands. All the boy wants is to deposit his wad and run.

What have the French been drinking anyway if they thought GM would help them break into China et al, where a scrappy Volkswagen most likely already unseated GM as China’s largest automaker (pending Volkswagen data)? GM’s again ostensible reason to deny Saab its licenses were to avoid competition in China. As for what GM has been smoking if they thought PSA would volunteer to be used as a hazardous waste site for Opel– we have asked this repeatedly.

Another reason: France’s new socialist government has been openly opposed to PSA’s diddling with Les Américains, and money talks. Not that  France’s new industry minister Arnaud Montebourg is totally against alliances, mais non,  but they must be with the proper people:

“Peugeot needs to build alliances. But we need to … measure their consequences for our country and obtain Peugeot’s commitment to preserve all its French sites.”

And wouldn’t you know, a day after the story breaks,  PSA is said to be in talks with India’s Tata Motors about an alliance, Reuters reports. Now this one would be a better fit. Growth markets beckon for PSA, Europe beckons for Tata, everybody happy.

The Big Deal du jour was for PSA and Opel to move in together in a joint-venture type setting. A joint study found by la Tribune envisaged the automotive arm of PSA and GM form a new entity. GM would contribute Opel, along with $5 billion, and GM’s best wishes for a happy future. That would have been a Very Big Deal for GM. Adam Jonas, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, figures $13 billion would be more like the proper dowry to off-load sick Opel.  Hear the fizzling sound?

PSA has been bailed out by the French government with a $24 billion rescue package, ostensibly to shore-up Peugeot-Citroen’s bank. Giving it directly to PSA would have violated EU rules. The Germans promptly cried foul and may sue. If Brussels says no, then Paris can (as it had done before) throw up its arms, say “we have tried” and the romantic couple can be at it again.

Spokesfolk at PSA and GM say it’s business as usual, and that an unbroken alliance will focus on “logistics, purchasing and product development.” Of course they would say that. However, if you lose between $1.5 and $1.8 billion in Europe, you won’t make it up with group purchases of wiper blades. As far as PSA is concerned, it has received nothing but grief from the deal with GM. BMW dumped them after BMW found a new lover in Toyota. Much more painful: PSA had to sacrifice a juicy parts and components deal with Iran, after a U.S. pressure group created a stink. Doubly painful: Having no American beau, Renault’s business with Iran thrives.

Messy, messy, messy.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

12 Comments on “FT: GM-PSA Tie-up On The Ropes Due To Irreconcilable Differences...”


  • avatar
    Detroit-X

    Why am I not surprised? Everyone but GM knew this PSA alliance was a mistake, and would fail. At the executive level, GM is severely lacking in intelligence and intuition (not to mention GM History 101).

  • avatar
    -Cole-

    Peogot sucks! Death to the sickest!

  • avatar
    danio3834

    In other news: Money is worthless and is now thrown around more frivolously than in a half hearted game of Monopoly.

  • avatar
    L'avventura

    I believe the logic behind a PSA-Tata deal was PSA would supply higher quality engine technology, and Tata would supply know-how and manufacturing of PSA’s Dacia low-cost car rival. Seems logical enough given PSA’s desire to compete with Renault-Nissan in the low-cost segment.

    Manager Magazin, which started this Tata-rumor, and is also the source of Bertel’s other story today about Wiedeking, claims PSA’s Philippe Varin & Ratan Tata to be long time friends.

    Tata is flatly denying any tie-up, but PSA is seriously out of options here.

    PSA has little to offer any suitor outside its European sales. Their global presence is fairly week; they do reasonably well in Russia and Latin America but not leader in either. Their eggs are completely in the Western European basket, which obviously isn’t doing well right now.

    Besides Tata, there really isn’t many options left for PSA outside a Chinese brand (Changan or Donfeng?)- which I don’t think the French government or unions would like.

  • avatar
    rnc

    The deal with Tata makes perfect sense, Citreon could be reborn off of the Jag platforms, soon all to be all aluminum (depends on agreements with Ford and what they plan to do with lincoln) and aim at the RR/Bent. in thier own classical godess way (maybe bot priced so high). Dacia could borrow alot from Tata and vice versa (as well as wide open access to the indian market as well as production). And PSA would be the mainstream brand. And maybe just maybe they could fire all of thier current designers and let the JLR designers re-do the skin (damn if the French don’t make about the ugliest cars around, even on top gear, before one of thier test, when the cars are 1-2 hundred yards away you can tell which one is a French car). Only negative, that damn loan, can’t close any plants in france, and the money can finance the cars at low rates but they have to make cars (Peugot and Citreon) that people actually want besides french loyalist and in the end they are still stuck with the same overcapicity/underproductivity problems that the Germans don’t have and Ford is aggressively addressing. Tata would also gain access to the Euro Truck/Bus market as well, PSA would be able to eurofy them to the correct standards.

    Yes would help PSA immensly, but until the government loan covenents run out, they are stuck with a major structural issue that will just grow as Ford adjusts and VAG keeps cruising along (it’s almost a three way race towards the drain between Opel, PSA and Fiat.)

  • avatar
    Dimwit

    Everyone should have seen this coming. As soon as GM accepted the union demands and guaranteed no closures until 2016 this deal was toast. PSA has to take all the pain over the French government’s veto? Not likely. Especially if they’re going to get some bailout money somewhere along the way.

    This soap opera has a long way to go yet.

  • avatar
    Googie

    GM seems affraid that the government rescue package could threaten the capacity of PSA to reorganize and cut its activities.

    PSA already launched the closing process of a plant with 8,000 jobs in France, and abandonned one of its strongest foreign market: Iran.

    I can understand that GM could worry about PSA, but for the moment they did way more efforts than GM….that absolutely took no decisions in order to repair its European activities.

  • avatar
    th009

    The $24B is a bit misleading; there is $15B in new financing from banks, supported by a $9B government loan guarantee. No actual government cash injectiom, just the guarantee — but it does come with the handcuffs nevertheless.

  • avatar
    Pch101

    GM wants to be able to dump Opel if necessary. Opel is so difficult to unload that even paying someone to take it may not be enough.

    The Peugeot family doesn’t want to file bankruptcy, in order to protect their family fortune. GM was attractive when it was offering cash, but becomes less attractive when there is cash that can come from other sources.

    It’s the conflict between family ownership and business reality that is the problem here. PSA could benefit from a downsizing/ restructuring, yet the cost of that is too high to the family, given what that would do to them personally.

    Anyone who believes that Tata is going to save PSA from itself is in dreamland. PSA is always a day late and a euro short, and the decline of French trade barriers exposes and increases those weaknesses.

    • 0 avatar
      rnc

      Apparantly the PSA family doesn’t have a profitable industrial group as well as an automotive group that they could split? That’s why I was questioning why the hell Fiat auto wanted the chryco shares so bad, I’d move those shares, Alfa, Maserati and Ferrari over to the industrial group and leave Fiat auto to die (or get the italian unions to make some serious reconsiderations, because with them its not just cost, but productivity, quality and everything else from an RF 1970′s GM union shop nightmare)


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India