Ask The Best And Brightest: Which Brand Is Next For A Death Watch?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Gamblers, speculators, automotive industry sadists, and TTAC Best and Brightest™: welcome to the selection of the next candidates for Death Watch, where you get to have a say on which brand we should promote to the Throne of Irrelevancy.

After the events of Monday – American Suzuki’s Chapter 11 filing and subsequent ending of new car sales in the United States – there are still a few brands which are hanging out at the cliff waiting for a final push or in dire need of a savior to bring them back to the collective consciousness of the buying public.

Thanks to Timothy Cain’s Good Car, Bad Car, the latest sales numbers as of October 2012 have been tabulated and here are the brands who have sold under 100,000 units for the first 10 months of the year (excluding high-luxury brands, Maserati and Bentley):

Infiniti: 95,353 YTD, +20.6% vs 2011


Lincoln: 69,032 YTD, -2.7% vs 2011


Scion: 62,377 YTD, +50.1% vs 2011


Volvo: 55,826 YTD, –2.2% vs 2011


MINI: 54,419 YTD, +15.7% vs 2011


Mitsubishi: 50,103 YTD, -28.7% vs 2011


Land Rover: 34,803, +17.8% vs 2011


Fiat: 36,462 YTD, +130% vs 2011


Porsche: 28,226 YTD, +13.2% vs 2011


Suzuki: 21,188 YTD, -4.7% vs 2011


Jaguar: 10,249 YTD, +0.2% vs 2011


Smart: 8309 YTD, +103% vs 2011

There isn’t much red ink in this list, but the red ink that does exist tells an interesting story about each company.

Mitsubishi, with double digit percentage losses in sales over last year, is losing nameplates and has only introduced a low volume electric vehicle, the i-MiEV, and the new Outlander Sport/RVR in the last couple of years. The Lancer, a sharp looking car when first introduced, garners horrible fuel mileage and is getting on in age with no replacement in sight. Also, Mitsubishi’s volume seller, the Colt, isn’t available in the US or Canada. I could go on and on about the faults of Mitsubishi’s line-up and lack of excitement regarding future product, but my keyboard can only take so many keystrokes in a lifespan.

Then we get to Lincoln, which has turned into more a trim level for Ford products than an actual brand of its own and has been struggling for years to remain relevant. Ford did the right thing when euthanizing Mercury (it was only available in the US as it had been previously killed in Canada years before). Lincoln, on the other hand, has to survive in some form or another if Ford wants to successfully amortize the millions of dollars spent inventing in its platforms. With no real publicly known plan or future product exciting those of us under the age of 103, Lincoln’s continued existence looks bleak.

Which brings us to one of Ford’s previous properties, Volvo, which was sold off to Geely so the Dearborn automaker could pay its bills. Volvo may be popular in certain areas, but for the most part it has become a brand lost between volume and luxury. Volvo’s newest model, the V40, won’t even be making it to North American shores, which is a very telling move on behalf of the Chinese-owned Swedish brand. The always fashionable C30 hatch will be going the way of the dodo before not too long. And, Volvo’s line-up is SUV heavy, with only the S60 as a newer sedan in their range. Does Geely care about the North American market? Or would it rather bolster Volvo’s image in China while spurring on sales in Europe? Time will tell.

So, with that said, what do you think is the next brand to take a long drive off a short pier? Are we at the end of the Car Cull? Or are there still a few companies looking to exit stage left?

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 149 comments
  • Wsn Wsn on Nov 08, 2012

    "excluding high-luxury brands, Maserati and Bentley" How to interpret this line? 1) High-luxury brands plus Maserati and Bentley? So, both are considered a grade lower than Ferrari and RR, and thus not high-luxury brands? 2) High-luxury brands as Maserati and Bentley? In that case, either Ferrari is not a high-luxury brand, or it sold more than 100,000 YoD. Impressive.

  • RatherhaveaBuick RatherhaveaBuick on Nov 09, 2012

    I saw a new Galant today and I laughed a bit out loud. Mitsubishi is next. Rightfully so.

  • Lorenzo Heh. The major powers, military or economic, set up these regulators for the smaller countries - the big guys do what they want, and always have. Are the Chinese that unaware?
  • Lorenzo The original 4-Runner, by its very name, promised something different in the future. What happened?
  • Lorenzo At my age, excitement is dangerous. one thing to note: the older models being displayed are more stylish than their current versions, and the old Subaru Forester looks more utilitarian than the current version. I thought the annual model change was dead.
  • Lorenzo Well, it was never an off-roader, much less a military vehicle, so let the people with too much money play make believe.
  • EBFlex The best gift would have been a huge bonfire of all the fak mustangs in inventory and shutting down the factory that makes them.Heck, nobody would even have to risk life and limb starting the fire, just park em close together and wait for the super environmentally friendly EV fire to commence.
Next