Piston Slap: What Can I Do With That Stick in My Hand?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

man(ual) in milwaukee (yes really) writes:

hey ho –

i’d like to learn how to drive a manual transmission, and i’d like to learn all the tricks. i hear you can roll it down a hill and pop the clutch to start it, i’ve heard you can shift gears without pushing in the clutch at a certain rpm – are these things true? what other cool things can you do with a manual transmission?

Sajeev answers:

Damn son, I’ve never been called a “ho” before, but I’ll totally take it as a compliment. An ironic compliment, but enough about me and my insecurities…let’s focus on one’s need to have a stick in their hand for all means of motoring pleasure.

Yes you can “push start” a manual transmission car to get it running. You can also shift between gears without the clutch, but it takes a keen sense of when the transmission’s snychros and the engine are spinning at the right speed to make it work. I’d suggest practicing disengaging a gear without a clutch first, it’s done by feel with a little pressure on the gear stick as the RPMs fall down towards idle.

Other cool things:

  • Heel and Toe Downshifting: a must for anyone who wants to kill it on a roadcourse. I still need to master this, it’s very important.
  • Powershifting: Awesome, but only a bright idea if you have a gearbox that can handle it. Back in the day, I remember the LT-1/LS-1 Camaros where happier than a pig in poop when you’d powershift their T-56 gearboxes. Mustangs with T-5 and T-45 gearboxes? Not so much. Honda Tunerbois? Never.
  • General Car Control: a manual gearbox (compared to a conventional automatic) gives much more control over a vehicle at the limit. You can feel how and where the car’s powertrain can get the tires to the point of losing grip, either in terms of understeer or oversteer.
  • Better fuel economy and power: Manual gearboxes don’t use hydraulic fluid between elements of the powertrain, unlike the torque converter in an automatic. It’s more efficient (gear ratios being equal) and makes for more power put to the ground. The difference between an automatic and a manual in a smaller engined vehicle is where you really see the difference.
  • Price: manual transmission cars are often cheaper. When I bought my 2011 Ranger, one salesperson questioned my manual-transmission resolve. Not because he cared, because he didn’t have any sticks on the lot. My reply to him? I avoided the discussion above, instead saying “no way I’m gonna pay $800 more for something I don’t want on a $14,000 truck!

Off to you, dear gear jammin’ Best and Brightest.

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 128 comments
  • Sooke Sooke on Oct 25, 2012

    I left the lights on and fell asleep at a rest stop on I-5 in my 93 Nissan Altima. I managed to break the timing belt trying to bump start it. It never ocurred to me until reading these posts that the car wouldn't have started anyway because the electric fuel pump and the computer were dead. Lesson learned, I now pack booster cables in the spare tire well.

  • Athos Nobile Athos Nobile on Oct 26, 2012

    "Powershifting: Awesome, but only a bright idea if you have a gearbox that can handle it. Back in the day, I remember the LT-1/LS-1 Camaros where happier than a pig in poop when you’d powershift their T-56 gearboxes. Mustangs with T-5 and T-45 gearboxes? Not so much. Honda Tunerbois? Never." I regularly (read daily) powershifted a car I had. Never broke the tranny, and I missed a couple of shifts at 6K. I also hit the limiter a couple of times. Not an easy (or cheap) skill to hone. Gave me a new respect for Peugeot derived drivetrains.

  • Akear Does anyone care how the world's sixth largest carmaker conducts business. Just a quarter century ago GM was the world's top carmaker. [list=1][*]Toyota Group: Sold 10.8 million vehicles, with a growth rate of 4.6%.[/*][*]Volkswagen Group: Achieved 8.8 million sales, growing sharply in America (+16.6%) and Europe (+20.3%).[/*][*]Hyundai-Kia: Reported 7.1 million sales, with surges in America (+7.9%) and Asia (+6.3%).[/*][*]Renault Nissan Alliance: Accumulated 6.9 million sales, balancing struggles in Asia and Africa with growth in the Americas and Europe.[/*][*]Stellantis: Maintained the fifth position with 6.5 million sales, despite substantial losses in Asia.[/*][*]General Motors, Honda Motor, and Ford followed closely with 6.2 million, 4.1 million, and 3.9 million sales, respectively.[/*][/list=1]
  • THX1136 A Mr. J. Sangburg, professional manicurist, rust repairer and 3 times survivor is hoping to get in on the bottom level of this magnificent property. He has designs to open a tea shop and used auto parts store in the facility as soon as there is affordable space available. He has stated, for the record, "You ain't seen anything yet and you probably won't." Always one for understatement, Mr. Sangburg hasn't been forthcoming with any more information at this time. You can follow the any further developments @GotItFiguredOut.net.
  • TheEndlessEnigma And yet government continues to grow....
  • TheEndlessEnigma Not only do I not care about the move, I do not care about GM....gm...or whatever it calls itself.
  • Redapple2 As stated above, gm now is not the GM of old. They say it themselves without realizing it. New logo: GM > gm. As much as I dislike my benefactor (gm spent ~ $200,000 on my BS and MS) I try to be fair, a smart business makes timely decisions based on the reality of the current (and future estimates) situation. The move is a good one.
Next