GM Buys Indian JV Stake From SAIC, Estimated Cost Pegged at $125 Million

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

“It’s too early to say for sure whether GM will purchase the controlling stake in HKJV, and thereby regain full control of its India business. It is unlikely that SAIC will relinquish its grip on India, just because it suddenly can’t service the capital requirements of the HKJV. Possibly, more information will become available when GM files its Q3 paperwork, or possibly later.”

As it turns out, they did.

The HKJV we refer to above is what’s known widely as General Motors India. Originally a 50-50 JV between GM and SAIC, the HKJV was established in 2009. According to Reuters, the post-bankruptcy initiative saw GM contribute

“…two assembly plants, [an] engine plant and sales network in the Indian partnership, while SAIC contributed 23.5 billion rupees. At the time of the deal, GM said SAIC’s money would allow the venture to market more products in India, particularly small cars and ultra-cheap micro minivans and buses that GM makes with two Chinese partners.”

Our own Tyler Vandermeulen, in his investigation of GM’s finances, found this nugget in GM’s 10-Q filing.

‘We were informed of SAIC-HK’s intent to exercise its right to not participate in future capital injections in HKJV. If this occurs we plan to settle the promissory note in the three months ending September 30, 2012 and provide an additional equity investment of $125 million into HKJV. As a result SAIC-HK’s interest in HKJV would be diluted from 50% to 9%. We also anticipate that the shareholders agreement would be amended such that we obtain control of and consolidate HKJV.’

Such an event has now come to pass, and GM now holds a 93 percent stake in the operation, and the first fruit of the JV, the Chevrolet Sail, is expected to launch in November, followed by the Enjoy utility vehicle. The Enjoy is based on an SAIC vehicle badged as a Wuling in China. The terms of the SAIC-GM deal were not disclosed. Based on Vandermeulen’s assesment, the deal will presumably cost GM the $125 million cited above.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Acuraandy Acuraandy on Oct 17, 2012

    Hey India, as a US taxpayer and one who got screwed of the $8k 'first-time homebuyer' tax credit because an INDIAN COMPANY HAD THE TITLE TO MY HOUSE at closing and missed said credit that would've secured my family's future! by 25 days..... YOU'RE WELCOME.

  • Trail Rated Trail Rated on Oct 20, 2012

    Good Riddance. Today is the 50th anniversary of the 1962 Chinese attack on Ladakh and Tawang. I'm not sure how kindly Indian buyers will take to Chevrolet for trying to pawn off a rebadged Wuling, whatever that is. The Sail though does seem to fill a void.

  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
Next