Deep Throat: GM-PSA Deal Doomed, Girsky Tired, Wants Home. Experts: Sell Opel Already!

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Rubbing shoulders with industry types displaced to a Chinese city called Chengdu has its good parts. You hear stories you normally don’t see in a press release. An executive who works for the western partner of a large Chinese joint venture told me today that my story about Chinese interests killing the Opel deal between GM and PSA wasn’t true. At least not completely. As so often, in the denial was a much more interesting story. After another drink for encouragement, said executive told me very much off the record that GM is tired of the PSA deal and wants out. If that means leaving Opel for dead, so be it.

According to this executive, GM feels it wasn’t told the whole story before it dumped $423 million into PSA to buy 7 percent of the moribund company, and that PSA did not disclose the full extent of the troubles the French were in.

Also according to the executive, Steve Girsky recommends to call the PSA deal off, on grounds that PSA did not open the kimono wide enough.

As a matter of fact, says the executive and orders another one of what the Chinese in Chengdu may be drinking, Steve is pretty tired of the Opel and Europe mess.

If calling off the PSA deal pulls the last hose out of the German Opel patient, so be it. The PSA deal was praised as one of those “win-win” situations, where both could get rid of over-capacities and save much needed money. Since 1999, GM’s European arm has lost $16 billion.

The line that Buick & China were against the platform sharing is a semi-truth, says the now very relaxed exec. Of course they were not happy. But their opposition was a convenient reason to call-off the platform sharing, which would kill the whole deal elegantly and without anyone having to raise a big stink.

Early August, it was reported that GM may have to write down the PSA investment if it won’t turn for the better. On Monday, German media revealed that a deal between Opel and PSA that called for sharing of the Insignia platform was called off. Opel denied there ever was a deal.

Possibly, TTAC has become a target of the dreaded leaks. Who knows. I went to my hotel room to get some Chinese cash. Gotta go back to the bar.

PS: Meanwhile, Reuters reports from Detroit that “selling or otherwise divesting its money-losing Opel unit in Europe” is GM’s best option. That according to Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas who sees no end in Opel’s losses, and that exiting Opel could be the best move. He doesn’t think GM would make any money selling Opel, quite the opposite. He figures it could cost GM up to $13 billion, money needed to convince a buyer to take the hot potato, and to fund Opel’s pension obligations. Says the analyst:

“One of the worst things in the auto industry is owning a cash-burning, resource-consuming business. We believe the time has come for GM to find a new home for Opel.”

The Detroit Free press quotes “experts, including lead analyst Adam Jonas,” who recommend a “separation” of GM and Opel. The Detroit News toots into the same horn.

GM spokesman Jim Cain denied that Opel is for sale, telling Reuters that “despite the tough environment for the automotive business in Europe, we believe we have an opportunity to turn the Opel/Vauxhall business around and bring it back to long-term profitability.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • TireIrony TireIrony on Sep 07, 2012

    GM trying to make Opel work is like that guy at the end of the block trying to make that 91 Laser with the fried turbo and dead-raising speaker system "for sale $6,000" work. Nobody cares how much you put into it, or what it was worth back in the day, or how it got you a date with that French chick. It ain't worth spit now. And we told you she looked skeezy.

  • Omnifan Omnifan on Sep 07, 2012

    Jerry Lewis for president of France! Or GM?

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next