Biodiesel From Sewage Is Cheaper Than Ever

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

It’s not often publicly remarked upon, but the emphasis on biofuel capacity in the United States has a bit of an international political component to it. American farms exported well over 100,000 metric tons of corn and oilseed in 2010. Some major portion of that production was sent to oil-rich areas which are short on food. The E85 boondoggle can be viewed as a simple declaration to those nations: we can burn your food in our cars, but you can’t eat your oil.

America’s pretty good at producing another item besides food, however, and if early research is any indication, it could be used to run a significant portion of the nation’s car and truck fleet.

According to an article in Chemical & Engineering News, a new process developed by a team led by South Korean scientist Eilhann Kwon makes it easier to extract lipids from… well, you know:

Kwon and his colleagues found a cheaper feedstock for biodiesel production: sewage sludge, the semisolid material left over from wastewater treatment. This sludge is a rich source of lipids, the starting material for biodiesel. Most of sludge’s lipids come from bacteria living in it.

Kwon and his team used n-hexane to extract lipids from sludge pellets from a wastewater treatment plant in Suwon-City, South Korea. Compared to published yields of lipids from soybeans, the sludge produced 2,200 times more lipids per gram of feedstock. Sewage sludge is also a cheaper lipid source than soybeans, Kwon says. Each liter of lipids that the researchers extracted from sludge cost $0.03, while previously published data shows each liter from soybeans costs $0.80.

However, impurities including free fatty acids in the lipids extracted from sewage sludge would interfere with the conventional catalytic process for making biodiesel. So Kwon’s team developed a noncatalytic method that would work in the presence of free fatty acids and other impurities in the feedstock…

To test their idea, the team continuously fed methanol and the extracted sludge lipids into a reactor containing porous activated alumina and heated the reactor to 380 °C. Adding carbon dioxide to the reactor improved the reaction’s yield. The researchers’ method converted about 98% of the sludge lipids to biodiesel.

And there you have it. There’s nothing new about the idea of converting sewage sludge to energy: see this article for an early set of ideas on the topic. Furthermore, sewage sludge already has a cash value: you may be eating some of it right now. This new process maximizes the biofuel return, however, and makes it an attractive choice for future energy.

Will the day come when solar-powered home centrifuges generate biofuel from every toilet in the household? Well, it’s certainly no less likely to happen than, say, a national power infrastructure that would allow everyone in America to charge their Volt or Leaf on 220volt juice without browning-out the whole country every evening.


Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Sastexan Sastexan on Sep 03, 2012

    I don't understand why all the methane and sulfides from sewer mains is not burned on the spot to generate some electricity, instead of complicated carbon filters that require maintenance and/or forced air systems that require maintenance and electricity. Just like recycling paper, aluminum, and plastics (post-consumer), the economics of using existing resources are quickly catching up to our disposal-centric methods. We should not be so arrogant, selfish or blind as to realize that we need to use what we have more efficiently so that it lasts longer. Our consumption-based society has become drunk on entitlement (left-leaners, government handouts; right-leaners, deferring problems for the next person/group). There is a huge project taking place close to me to remove the frequent sewer-stink with complicated systems and structures. Although quite necessary (located close to many houses and in a national park used by many people), none of the studies performed (over a 10 year period) looked at the operating costs of these systems nor addressed any sort of sustainability component (although they did address endangered species - like hydrogen sulfide is killing special rats trying to get into the sewer or something). We oughta be ashamed of ourselves for not looking at the lifetime cost - only addressing a 1 or at a maximum, 5 year budget, when we will have to deal with the consequences for decades.

  • Ry_Trapp0 Ry_Trapp0 on Sep 03, 2012

    i love the classic "burning food" comment. do the tiniest amount of research and you'll see that corn is used to produce EVERYTHING. and, for some reason, it's politically/morally/whatever correct to use corn for all of these things - but it's not OK to use it as a fuel. check out the percentages, ethanol isn't the highest single non-food use of corn. "we can burn your food in our cars" BTW, we aren't burning *their* food in our cars - we're burning *our own* food that we sell to them for a profit.

  • Ajla If I was Ford I would just troll Stellantis at all times.
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
Next