Suzuki Death Watch 5: How Deep Would You Cut to Make a Profit?

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

The grim reaper may not be at American Suzuki’s door step after all. We’ve learned ASMC is healthier, at least financially, than we thought. But, in order to be profitable last year, ASMC had to completely cut almost every non-essential (and some essential) function of their business.


American Suzuki has been very conservatively run since introducing its motorcycle line to North America. With the automotive division only selling 26,618 units last year in the US (that’s less than both Porsche and Land Rover) and margins on those vehicles – all imported from outside North America, except for the Equator – being razor thin, it was clear as day serious cuts needed to be made if coming out of the year in the black was the main goal.

Public Relations? What Public Relations?

As we mentioned in an earlier Suzuki Death Watch article, Melissa Fujimoto is currently fielding media requests after the departure of PR veteren Jeff Holland. Before her media wrangling duties, Fujimoto spent around 10 years with promotions in an administrative role at ASMC. In 2011, all promotions activities were cancelled, leaving Fujimoto without a portfolio. So, instead of releasing the long-term, loyal employee, they made the logical choice and moved her on to other duties.

Those other duties, while including media relations, are mainly as secretary for ASMC President Seiichi Maruyama.

This may seem odd, but it makes sense when you realize ASMC’s current position. There are no plans to release any new product in the next 12-18 months, save facelifts for the Grand Vitara and SX4, so there are not a ton of media requests. Most current PR duties include reporting monthly sales and managing the press fleet, which can easily be managed by someone whose background is an administrative role in promotions.

ASMC still outsources other PR and marketing duties to Paine PR.

Auto Shows? What Auto Shows?

Before last year, ASMC participated in 66 auto shows. That number has been cut down to four. With no new product in the wings, going to extra auto shows is just an added marketing expense that isn’t needed. In some ways, it is a smart move to cut costs, yet it really takes the brand out of the public eye that may not live close to a Suzuki dealer.

The number of dealers is also dwindling. Current dealer development is arrested, with a number of franchise owners taking $50,000 buy outs to close their doors.

Everything Is Being Cut To The Bone

ASMC has lost top notch talent and has been selling very low volumes of cars with even lower margins. Yet, in 2011, ASMC made a profit and sent bonus checks to all its employees.

“People don’t understand how frugally (Suzuki) can run a car company,” said one source who spoke under condition of anonymity, “When employees of other automakers tell me how much they spend on things, it blows me away.”

Those profits come with a cost. Brand recognition is at an all time low. Product development is virtually non-existant. And, over time, more talent will leave for less stressful pastures. While the mood at Suzuki is currently said to be “normal”, its hard to ignore the deafening silence of a dearth of new product and a shrinking dealer network.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 20 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Aug 08, 2012

    Perhaps Suzuki intends to survive like Checker Motor Co., which limped through the 1980s selling a few taxicabs and doing metal stamping for GM. Surprisingly, Checker did not file for bankruptcy until 2009.

    • See 3 previous
    • Ranwhenparked Ranwhenparked on Aug 08, 2012

      Checker also dabbled in a number of other businesses - International Controls, Great Dane trailers, Yellow Cab, American Country Insurance, and some others. I believe the Markin family may still own all or part of some of Checker's affiliated businesses. Diversification through acquisition is another option for American Suzuki to survive. It also worked for Studebaker, which survived until 1979, when it was absorbed by McGraw-Edison. Of course, the big thing that makes this different is that Checker and Studebaker were American automakers that collapsed in the American market. Suzuki is a Japanese automaker that is struggling on the American market, but that is still quite strong in most other places, including at home. They really can afford to fail here, to a certain extent, and let the rest of the world carry them.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 11, 2012

    Why not rebadge other Japanese models and sell them as Suzuki in US. E.g. let them rebadge Nissan Altima as Suzuki and in exchange let Nissan sell pianos and other musical instruments under their badge. As far as I know it is normal practice in Japan. IIRC Suziku were rebadged Daewoos until recently. Then they tried to sell some obscure model based on GM short wheelbase platform which was praised by journalists.

  • FreedMike I would find it hard to believe that Tesla spent time and money on developing a cheaper model, only to toss that aside in favor of a tech that may or may not ever work right. Having said that, though, I think what's happening with Tesla is something I've been predicting for a long time - they have competition now. That's reflected in their market share. Moreover, their designs are more than a bit stale now - the youngest model is the Model Y, which is in its' fifth model year. And it's hard to believe the Model 3 is in its' seventh model year. Aside from an interior restyle on the Model 3, neither of those cars looks substantially different than they did when they came on the market. That's a problem. And you can also toss in Tesla's penchant for unnecessary weirdness as a liability - when the Model 3 and Y were introduced, there was no real competition for either, so people had to put up with the ergonomic stupidity and the weird styling to get an electric compact sedan or crossover. Today, there's no shortage of alternatives to either model, and while Tesla still holds an edge in battery and EV tech, the competition is catching up. So...a stale model lineup, acceptable alternatives...and Elon Musk's demon brain (the gift that keeps on giving), All that has undercut their market share, and they have to cut prices to stay competitive. No wonder they're struggling. Solution? Stop spending money on tech that may never work (cough...FSD) and concentrate on being a car company.
  • EBFlex “Tesla’s first-quarter net income dropped a whopping 55 percent”That’s staggering and not an indicator of a market with insatiable demand. These golf cart manufacturers are facing a dark future.
  • MrIcky 2014 Challenger- 97k miles, on 4th set of regular tires and 2nd set of winter tires. 7qts of synthetic every 5k miles. Diff and manual transmission fluid every 30k. aFe dry filter cone wastefully changed yearly but it feels good. umm. cabin filters every so often? Still has original battery. At 100k, it's tune up time, coolant, and I'll have them change the belts and radiator hoses. I have no idea what that totals up to. Doesn't feel excessive.2022 Jeep Gladiator - 15k miles. No maintenance costs yet, going in for my 3rd oil change in next week or so. All my other costs have been optional, so not really maintenance
  • Jalop1991 I always thought the Vinfast name was strange; it should be a used car search site or something.
  • Theflyersfan Here's the link to the VinFast release: https://vingroup.net/en/news/detail/3080/vinfast-officially-signs-agreements-with-12-new-dealers-in-the-usI was looking to see where they are setting up in Kentucky...Bowling Green? Interesting... Surprised it wasn't Louisville or Northern Kentucky. When Tesla opened up the Louisville dealer around 2019 (I believe), sales here exploded and they popped up in a lot of neighborhoods. People had to go to Indy or Cincinnati/Blue Ash to get one. If they manage to salvage their reputation after that quality disaster-filled intro a few months back, they might have a chance. But are people going to be willing to spend over $45,000 for an unknown Vietnamese brand with a puny dealer/service network? And their press photo - oh look, more white generic looking CUVs. Good luck guys. Your launch is going to have to be Lexus in 1989/1990 perfect. Otherwise, let me Google "History of Yugo in the United States" as a reference point.
Next