Piston Slap: 38,000 Impala Police Cars Recalled, Chevrolet Claims Victory?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC commentator Sinistermisterman writes:

Why isn’t Sajeev all over this one like a rash? GM recalls 38,000 cop cars.

Sajeev answers:

Well, I do have a job outside of TTAC! But you have a good point. To wit: OMG SON PANTHER LOVE FTW!

The obvious “niche” rant about the need for a proper American sedan with a proper frame aside, there could be a bad batch of parts and not a failure of the entire platform. Cop-spec Impalas have unique control arms, since the civilian version is just fine. But this shows the value (or lack thereof) in a wrong-wheel drive, fleet specific application. Time is money, and the Impala just wasted a lot of time for fleet managers around the country. But the Impala is history, there’s no more FWD in GM’s cop car coffers.

So who is the real loser? Ford. The Crown Vic killers are the only folks offering a wrong-wheel drive cop car, so the writing is on the wall: spindles, ball joints, half-shafts and control arms in a FWD platform are a big threat to Law Enforcement. No matter how you beef ’em up!

And who is the winner? Chevy. But not the Caprice, the Tahoe. When the dust settles on Panther Love in the next 2-3 years, there will be another clear winner in Cop Car land: a durable, versatile, comfortable and fuel-efficient body-on-frame Chevrolet Tahoe.

Don’t buy the fuel efficiency comment? I suspect many fleets are used to budgeting for 4-speed automatic Panther levels of gas suckage, so a lateral move to the 6-speed Tahoe won’t raise eyebrows in their communities.

And if they do? Well, have a look at the alternative’s lack of control (arm). Off to you, Best and Brightest!

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 70 comments
  • Pinzgauer Pinzgauer on Aug 16, 2012

    Saw a Nissan Altima NYC Police Car sitting in the Bronx the other day. Makes me wonder how the CVT will hold up to police use.

  • Acuraandy Acuraandy on Aug 18, 2012

    Ask any cop, other than major urban areas, FWD is useless. Too weak.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next