Suzuki Death Watch 3: Oh, Yeah, We Did Replace Those People…

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

When the brightest news you share about your brand is a couple of facelifts and the inclusion of a factory-installed Garmin GPS unit in the next model year, things aren’t going all that well at your company. But, when we inquired with American Suzuki (and Suzuki Canada) about the future of the brand, we did get some interesting information that didn’t seem important enough in Brea, California to publish a press release.

Melissa Fujimoto has a tough job at the smallest non-luxury automotive brand in the US: damage control. After being with American Suzuki on the promotions end of the business, she has the pleasure of filling former PR extraordinaire Jeff Holland’s shoes who left the company earlier in the year.

Where things get really interesting is on the marketing side. Former head of marketing, Steve Younan, who silently slipped out the door of the American Suzuki headquarters in January, has been permanently replaced by newly minted Marketing Manager David Ossenmacher, who’s been with American Suzuki since 2010. Mr. Ossenmacher has an interesting professional past, including nine years with Nissan North America and another three with Hyundai North America during the doldrum product years of the early 2000s (Remember the Hyundai XG? No, we don’t either.) After parting ways with the Korean marque in 2003, David left the automotive industry altogether…to sell houses.

When Melissa Fujimoto replied to my inquiry about Suzuki’s future, the first thing mentioned was Suzuki having “one of the most aggressive financing offers in the industry and our popular 0% for 72 months has been extended into July,” promptly followed by a reconfirmation of facelifts and other features which aren’t new news.

But, maybe this is the line American Suzuki will be towing for the next 12-24 months, as Mr. Ossenmacher tries to sell the outdated imports like cheap properties on the most undesirable corner of Detroit.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 55 comments
  • Domestic Hearse Domestic Hearse on Jul 24, 2012

    Suzuki has been a failure to launch because from the US HQ down through the regional ranks to the local level, there is absolutely zero coordination of sales messaging, marketing support, strategy and coordination, and product distribution/availability. In fact, Suzuki set up its automotive marketing and product network even more haphazardly than it did its motorcycle channels, and that, as everyone in the bike industry knows, was wing-it-and-a-prayer. Best described as a rolling accident, I guess. So while modern manufacturers have three defined and coordinated tiers of marketing budgets and strategies, Suzuki, for all practical purposes, has none. It, as an entity in the US, never had a plan, never had a vision, didn't and doesn't have a workable structure on any (or across any) level. It would take an overhaul of epic proportions to right this ship, and many, many millions of dollars to fix US operations. Never mind its current and future product offerings. In short, against well-oiled operations like Toyota, Nissan, and Honda (and even Mazda, for that matter, comparatively speaking), Suzuki is as good now as they'll ever get in the US. Unfortunately (and consequently), that may no longer be enough to even survive.

  • Wheatridger Wheatridger on Jul 25, 2012

    One little grammatical point-- you're not "towing a line" unless you're a deep-sea fisherman. Put your foot right behind the line, instead. Now, you're toeing it.

    • Mark Stevenson Mark Stevenson on Jul 27, 2012

      Hah, thanks for the lesson. Still going to keep it in there to show I am not infallible.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next