By on July 17, 2012

The GE Wattstation killed my Leaf! That’s the story being reported by the New York Times as well as PlugInCars.com. As the tale goes, 11 Leaf owners have had their chargers “damaged” while charging with GE’s Wattstation home charging station. The relative significance of only 11 failures aside, the Nissan Dealer in San Pablo, CA confirmed to PlugInCars.com that Nissan North America has notified dealers of a potential problem with the Leaf and the GE home charging station. TTAC contacted Hilltop Nissan and they have yet to return our calls. Rather than just parroting back the usual news reports we dug deep. We contacted GE and Nissan, consulted some professional electrical engineers and read though hundred of pages of boring SAE documents. Click past the jump to learn more about EV charging than you ever wanted to know.

Before we dissect the dead Leaf issue, we must first understand how EV charging stations work. Because there were a wide variety of charging connectors prior to the Nissan Leaf and Chevy Volt coming on the scene, we’re going to focus on just the SAE J1772 standard. Other than Tesla, who has decided to off on a tangent with their “prettier” charging connector, all EVs and PHEVs on sale in America use this connector. The short list includes the Leaf, Volt, Karma, Coda, Prius Plug-in, i MiEV, Fit EV, RAV4 EV, Focus Electric, Smart EV, and ActiveE.

The first thing you need to understand is that a “charging station” or “EV home charger” is a confusing term that seems to imply that the home unit is “doing all the work.” In reality, the J1772 connector and station you plug your car into is simply a “smart” extension cord for your car. All the circuitry required to charge the battery, monitor the rate of charge, and keep tabs of the heath of the battery are driving around with you all the time.

Wait! Why is my charger in my car, isn’t that inefficient? While the extra weight of hauling around your charger sounds crazy at first, it is the easiest way to make the charging infrastructure both universal and cost-effective. Because each EV’s battery differs in cell count, voltage, chemistry, cooling characteristics and capacity, it is easier to supply AC power directly to the car and allow the car’s electronics to charge the battery the way it sees fit. The charging connector is simply responsible for communicating to the vehicle what kind of power is available and providing protection to the electrical circuit on which it is installed.

The J1772 connector has 5 pins: AC1, AC2, ground, “control pilot” (aka data) and “proximity detection.” AC1, AC2 and ground are fairly self-explanatory. When using 120VAC AC1 is power and AC2 is neutral. When connected to a 240V circuit AC1 is power and AC2 becomes power as well.

OK, why not just use an extension cord? What’s going on in my charger? Excellent question. Inside the charger we essentially get some relays that turn on and off the power to the pins when the car requests it. In addition we have electronics that communicate the power type (120VAC or 240VAC) and maximum charge current available from the charging station.

So how does it work? When the station is not connected to a car, the AC1 and AC2 pins are not active. This is a safety measure to keep you safe if you should decide to go probing with a paperclip. When you start to connect the vehicle, the first thing that connects is the ground pin because it is longer than the others. The ground in theory helps prevent (among other things) static discharge that could harm the electrical components. The next pins that connect are the power, data and proximity detection pins. Now that everything is connected, the car sees the proximity detect line, establishes a data connection with the charging station, and tells the car what voltage and current options are available. Part of this process involves checking for the presence of a small silicone diode SAE refers to as D1. According to SAE, the purpose of D1 is that it “insures that an EV is actually connected and can be discriminated from other potential low impedance loads.” In other words, D1 isn’t involved in actually charging, just in the verification that there’s actually a car connected to the plug. Next, the car tells the charger what kind of charging it will be doing and requests power. The station energizes AC1 and AC2, the car begins drawing power and charging the battery.

During the charge the station and the car are both monitoring the connection and either device can end the charge at any time. When you unplug the car, the first connections broken are the proximity and control pilot connections, which cause the station to stop power to AC1 and AC2 within milliseconds.

Back to that whole GE thing

The core of the issue seems to be the circuitry that communicates with the charging station. According to SAE, “the minimum control circuit necessary on the EV to use in conjunction with the inlet uses one diode, one capacitor, and one resistor“. Based on the way these components are connected between the “control pilot” pin and the ground connector, the station knows a car is connected and can tell basic charge status.

With me so far? Let’s dig deeper. Suppose that for some reason you had a bad building ground that caused some sort of transient voltage, or ground fault in your home’s electrical system, or a massive power surge from your utility. If this was the case, it is possible to damage the diode which, in this case, is the most likely component to be damaged from a reverse voltage situation. Again, this is possible because the station just connects the car’s on-board charger to the mains. This is likely enough that the J1772 spec outlines that D1 should be rated for at least 100V because “this diode is exposed directly to cable transients.” If D1 fails, charging stations that adhere strictly to J1772 won’t energize AC1 and AC2 because they will think that there is no vehicle connected or there is a fault in the connection.

Actual failures

From my forum research is appears that the Leaf failures fall into two broad categories: D1 failure and a failure involving more than just D1 on the control side of the charger.

The failures can be identified from one another by using the EVSE (Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment) that came with your car. Users on MyNissanLeaf.com report that if D1 has failed, then the car will still charge with the EVSE as it does not check for the existence of D1 in the first place. If the car fails to charge period, then there’s more wrong.

Assuming there is no design fault inherent in the Wattstation’s “control pilot” design (and we might assume this logically because the issues are limited to Nissan Leaf vehicles only), the most likely possibility is a problem with the an underrated or faulty D1 diode in the Leaf’s charger that makes the control pilot circuit more susceptible to transient current and failure. While it does seem fishy that the problems are only reported with the Wattstation and not the popular Leviton and Nissan branded chargers, the issue likely comes down to surge suppression and bad luck. It is likely that Nissan uses a D1 diode with a lower rating (and therefore affording less protection) than the Volt and Prius plug-in. With so few EVs on the road, and little public information on the specifications of electrical components in the chargers it is hard to say for sure.

With US Leaf sales at approximately 12,841 through June 2012, Volt sales at 16,814, i MiEV at 413 and some 2,000 Plug-in Prius sales to the same date, there are some 32,000 EV/PHEVs on the road (not counting the smaller volume vehicles). GE won’t release specific sales numbers simply citing sales in the “thousands.” Even if we assume this means only 2,000, then the number of actual problem units is just over half a percent. If you assume that half the units went to Volt owners and half went to Leaf owners, then the problem percentage raises only to about 1% of all the units being used with the Leaf. Maybe.

Confirming our hypothesis which is that the root cause of the failure is a factor external to the Leaf we got a statement from Nissan at the 11th hour.

We are aware of several isolated instances of Nissan LEAFs sustaining damage due to voltage current spikes from the power grid. These isolated instances, while resulting in component damage to the on-board charger, did not result in any injuries or fires.  Some of these reported occurred while LEAFs were charging at GE WattStations. Nissan and GE are working to investigate every issue and determine root cause of the charging issues. While this issue represents a handful of incidents out of millions of charging events involving the Nissan LEAF, we are doing everything we can to get to the bottom of the issue. --Katherine Zachary, Nissan North America

While a power surge/spike is the most likely cause, it seems to highlight a possible shortcoming in the Leaf’s charging circuitry that may make it more susceptible to this type of damage. But it’s probably not all D1’s fault, your home might be killing your leaf. If you live in a home built before 1960, your home was likely built without grounded outlets, and possibly without the neutral line being connected to ground properly. If the neutral is “floating,” there is the possibility of having some very strange voltage potentials at the charging connector to your car. We have no real way of knowing whether the Leaf or the Volt is more likely to fail from this sort of event, but we can assume that it may manifest itself in the Leaf first as Volts don’t have to be plugged in to operate. There are a few steps you should take regardless.

1. Get a surge suppressor. You put one on your computer, your TV, your stereo and even your fridge. Why wouldn’t you put one on the most expensive appliance you’ll ever buy? Regardless of the outcome of the GE/Nissan investigation, the few hundred you’ll spend on a surge suppressor is insurance well spent, especially if you live in a lightning prone area. According to GE, the Wattstation has an internal 6kV surge protection per UL2231-2 & IEC 1000-4-5 which is the same standard that Leviton and other competitors meet. Buy a whole house surge suppressor anyway.

2. Have an electrician checkout your electrical system before you have a station installed. This may seem like a no brainer, but if you’re just asking your electrician to install an outlet to plug the station into, or hard wire the station, they may not check your main panel to see what’s going on. Be sure they check your main and all sub-panels (at the least) to see if everything is kosher.

3. If you live in a lighting prone area, have lightning rods professionally installed on your home.

 

In the end this is a textbook example of the power of the internet. The fact that a very small percentage of problems can make a New York Times article is amusing to say the least. But it also tells us something else: As EVs gain market share and our cars become essentially expensive electrical appliances with expensive computers inside, we need to re-think how we view the quality of the power in our homes.

 

According to the New York Times: A spokeswoman for Nissan North America, Katherine Zachary, said in an e-mail, “There’s no official Nissan policy instructing customers not to use G.E. WattStations.”

We contacted GE ourselves and got the following response:

Since its launch in 2011, GE’s WattStation Wall Mount has performed as designed, thousands of units have been shipped, and it has received positive reviews from EV drivers. Regarding the charging issue raised by 11 Nissan Leaf owners who had GE WattStations, GE’s current analysis does not indicate that the WattStation is the cause of the reported failures.  GE has been actively working with Nissan to help determine the source of this issue. The GE WattStation has not encountered a similar issue with other brands of electric vehicles. GE’s WattStation is also designed and tested to the SAE J1772 and appropriate UL standards and these tests have been validated by an independent third party. And there have been no design changes to WattStation since its 2011 launch.

The GE WattStation has surge protection per UL2231-2 & IEC 1000-4-5 which will protect the internal circuitry of the charger in the event of a surge up to 6kV.  This  is consistent with what is seen with our competitors.  –Sean Gannon, GE Energy Spokesperson

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

21 Comments on “Dead LEAFs and GE Chargers...”


  • avatar
    mike978

    Thanks Alex for a very informative and detailed article. I certainly learnt some new information.
    It seems the numbers are too small at the moment for definitive conclusions. It wouldn`t be unknown for teething problems to occur – they did with the Volt.

  • avatar
    gmichaelj

    “OK, why not just use an extension cord? What’s going on in my charger? Excellent question. Inside the charger we essentially get some relays that turn on and off the power to the pins when the car requests it. In addition we have electronics that communicate the power type (120VAC or 240VAC) and maximum charge current available from the charging station.”

    I think your Q&A avoids the underlying question: why couldn’t the pins, etc be built into the car as well. why not put all the tech into the car? ‘Because we can sell you a “charging station” as well’?

    • 0 avatar
      Syke

      Agreed. Maybe in my lack of understanding I’m oversimplifying, but why couldn’t this have been done so that all you needed in the garage was a 120v or 240v outlet (like the one that you plug your clothes dryer into)?

      • 0 avatar
        Alex L. Dykes

        The reason cited is this: The national electric code doesn’t allow for extension cords for high draw devices. That’s kind of a reason for me, but the bigger one is: how does the car know how much current it can draw? The charging station tells it. Look at the J1772 standard, it allows for charging at up to 90A. The new Tesla S can charge at this rate but the Leaf charges at 13.75A. If you had your 20A max Leaf Station wired in with appropriate wiring and you plugged your Tesla into it, the breaker would constantly trip because there is nothing to tell the Tesla to slow it down. However with the station, you get the protection of electrical disconnect and you get the ability to tell the car how much current it can draw. Personally, a 90A draw would blow my main since I live in a tiny cabin with a 100A service so literally the car could be the only thing drawing power.

  • avatar
    el scotto

    Sadly, lawyers will be involved. Does Nissan explain that a professional electrician is need to install the charger.

    • 0 avatar
      Alex L. Dykes

      Yes Nissan does, but who knows who installed the 11 GE chargers.

      • 0 avatar
        sudden1

        1. The installation of the wall unit would require an electrical permit. 2. Electrical permits can only be pulled by licensed electricians. 3. An Electrical Inspector will then verify that the installation was performed properly. 4. At least in theory.

      • 0 avatar
        highdesertcat

        Yep, sudden1 is right, and in some places that costs an additional two grand, over and above the cost of the charger; Manhattan, for example.

        That’s why my brother sold his Leaf to a Golf Course owner in Alabama. No such issues there. The guy was all set up to Quick-charge all his golfcarts @240-3phase.

      • 0 avatar
        Silvy_nonsense

        “2. Electrical permits can only be pulled by licensed electricians.”

        That’s only true is those jurisdictions where unions have successfully lobbied to add regulatory barriers of dubious value. Some locales allow property owners to apply and pay for permits, do the work themselves or hire a licensed professional, then call in for any required inspections.

      • 0 avatar
        highdesertcat

        Silvy_nonsense, where do you live?

        The biggest worry that most home owners and landlords have is that their insurance company won’t cover fire insurance claims if there is no paper trail with names, dates and places, when something goes amiss, even if it is not directly related to the electrical wiring.

        Several years ago, a lady friend lost her pre-50’s home to a fire and her insurance co denied the claim, although it had nothing to do with the electrical wiring.

        When her husband was still alive, he had upgraded the wall-outlets to the ‘grounded’ kind and had taken care to run a ground-line for each to a special ground pole in the ground.

        He had also upgraded all the wall switches to those big fat lighted decorative wall switches so old people could just push the switch with their hands instead of flicking with a finger.

        But he never got a permit for it and that was grounds enough to deny the claim.

        The fire started in the bathroom inside a gas-lit wall heater that had been there for decades. The bi-metal over-temp sensor failed and the gas-valve inside the valve-body was stuck in the open position feeding the burners until the firebreak overheated and caught fire.

        She had to go to court for a settlement but she didn’t get anywhere near what the house was insured for.

  • avatar
    schmitt trigger

    There is a characteristic very unique to the Japanese power grid: Their home voltage is 100VAC, not 120VAC; and the next voltage is 200VAC, instead of 240VAC.

    This is the only country in the world that uses this particular scheme.

    I’m not stating this as a fact, but rather only wondering out loud: could it be that the Leaf does not have the proper voltage derating?

    • 0 avatar
      spinjack

      The Japanese grid is more complicated than that. Some areas do indeed have 100/200/400 VAC 60Hz, but others have 100/200/400 50Hz, or 120/240/480VAC 60Hz, while still other areas have 110/220/380 50Hz. The rebuild after WWII fragmented the power grid. It all depended upon what was destroyed and what was rebuilt and by whom.

      Point being, the Leaf’s electronics will definitely have been designed to handle a very wide range of voltages and frequencies. At least for the Japanese market. Whether or not a different design went into the U.S. bound Leafs…

  • avatar
    redmondjp

    As an electrical engineer who has worked in automotive electronic design, it saddens (but not suprises) me that somebody has “value-engineered” out a few dollars’ worth of components which would have prevented this issue. Design fail for lack of robustness.

    In the pre-Welch GE era, while they were still leaders in EV technology, this kind of thing would have NEVER happened.

  • avatar

    It’s work like this that makes me proud to be associated with TTAC. Everyone else reported on the problem but Alex dug deep and gave us some real information. Well done, sir.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    As pointed out above anything like a charging station must be installed by a licensed electrician. Only a madman would do it by himself or let an unlicensed worker do it.

    It is, and has been for many years, a violation of code to install a socket with a neutral ground receptacle and not have the neutral properly grounded. The inspectors will check and will not approve if it isn’t. end of story.

    • 0 avatar
      stuart

      You’re correct about grounding.

      However, as noted by silvy above, many (most?) jurisdictions allow the property owner to be their own “contractor” on their own property. I looked at some Wattstation(tm) installation instructions (easy to locate with your favorite search engine), and it’s almost identical to installing an oven or a dryer. I guess it’s possible to screw this up, but, gosh, it’s not very complicated.

      Having done some electrical work on my own home, I can say that the electrical inspectors are exceedingly demanding when the installer is not one of their union brothers. :-)

      stuart

    • 0 avatar
      Silvy_nonsense

      “As pointed out above anything like a charging station must be installed by a licensed electrician.”

      That is not universally true in the United States. Code requirements vary by jurisdiction. However, it is universally true that charging station manufacturers won’t honor the warranty on the unit unless it is installed by a licensed electrician.

      “Only a madman would do it by himself or let an unlicensed worker do it.”

      That’s an over-reaction. It’s like saying only a fool would work on an internal combustion engine because it burns highly flammable gasoline in controlled explosions that could set you on fire and/or blow you up.

      Some auto maintenance jobs are simple and safe, some are complex and dangerous. Electrical work is no different. I doubt you think that car owners doing complex auto maintenance tasks are “madmen”. You don’t always need to be a licensed professional to do the work correctly and safely. If people can learn to do auto maintenance correctly and safely, they can certainly learn to do electrical work correctly and safely.

      We’re lucky that auto mechanics unions haven’t wised up and lobbied to require that working on a car requires a permit and only “licensed” mechanics can pull the permit. (I assume this is next on the agenda after “right to repair”. Kidding!)

  • avatar
    Ron B.

    Forget all this crap, buy something you just need to pull up at a gas station with and fill up with good old reliable liquid fuel and drive off. No bull about power leads blah blah.
    Electric cars have NOT progessed since the first ones over 100 years ago. Only the marketing is different now,instead of appealing to wealthy women drivers through ease of control they now pretend to offer some sort of green credentials to the under 40’s who have not looked into the poweer usage question beyond the plug point on the wall. The old expression “sucked in” applies to Prius and leaf etc buyers in my opinion.

    • 0 avatar
      DaeGoesFast

      Yes Ron, all the operating concepts for electric vehicles are the same now as the were a century ago, but that’s about it. I’ll have to draw the line if you are actually insinuating that advancements in electronics haven’t given the electric car any extra edge since then. There are many incentives to use an electrical platform for transportation that go beyond the ability to simply plug into your wall outlet for cheaper “fuel”. I wonder how much you have looked into the power usage question as well. The most obvious change of the times I can think of is the vast amount of available sources of which you could get your electricity, while the sources of fossil fuels can only continue to decrease further than they already have.

  • avatar
    Steve65

    “the most likely possibility is a problem with the an underrated or faulty D1 diode in the Leaf’s charger that makes the control pilot circuit more susceptible to transient current and failure.”

    “Confirming our hypothesis which is that the root cause of the failure is a factor external to the Leaf…”

    These statements seem to directly contradict each other. What am I missing?

    • 0 avatar
      Alex L. Dykes

      It’s convoluted, but the cause was external to the Leaf and the GE WattStation but it still may have been prevented, IMHO, by using a more robust D1.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States