Chrysler Would Be Hit Hardest In CAW Strike

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

With 25 percent of its manufacturing capabilities in Canada, Chrysler would be hardest hit in the event of a strike by the Canadian Auto Workers union.

An article in the Windsor Star outlining the upcoming negotiations between The Big Three and the CAW describes how Chrysler is most vulnerable to a potential strike by the CAW. Tony Faria, professor emeritus of business at the University of Windsor told the paper

“The minivan is still a very important product, even though the segment is down…For Chrysler, the minivan represents about 10 to 12 per cent of its global sales.”

The Chrysler minivans are built solely at the Windsor plant, meaning a strike would cripple one of Chrysler’s core products in both the U.S. and Canada. Faria also noted that

“Ford, however, wouldn’t have much to lose since it’s producing low-selling vehicles, such as the Edge and Flex, and GM could shift at least overflow production of its hot-selling Chevy Equinox to its plant in Spring Hill, Tenn.”

Of course, this is all assuming there even is a strike. The whole thing could be averted if negotiations between the automakers and the CAW goes well – which is up for debate. The automakers are pushing hard to bring labor costs down to U.S. levels, while the union is looking for wage increases and a cost-of-living-adjustment. Chrysler’s Sergio Marchionne has suggested alternatives, including profit sharing and other lump-sum deals in lieu of wage increases.

Observers, including Faria, feel that Chrysler will most likely be targeted first for negotiations (since the first deal reached with an automaker generally sets the tone for the other agreements), but GM may also emerge as a contender, since the CAW is looking to secure product guarantees for their Oshawa plant. GM CEO Dan Akerson recently claimed that Canada was the most expensive place in the world to build cars.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • 50merc 50merc on Jul 25, 2012

    Would a strike really have much adverse effects? Couldn't the striking workers live on unemployment and/or strike benefits? August seems like a nice month to go vacationing in the Canadian Rockies. As for Chrysler, don't they have one or two months of inventory on hand? Plus, this is the time of year for plant shutdowns for model year changeover.

  • GS650G GS650G on Jul 26, 2012

    Give Sergio a reason to move production elsewhere. Go ahead.

  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
  • Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.
  • Eliyahu A fine sedan made even nicer with the turbo. Honda could take a lesson in seat comfort.
  • MaintenanceCosts Seems like a good way to combine the worst attributes of a roadster and a body-on-frame truck. But an LS always sounds nice.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I recently saw, in Florida no less an SSR parked in someone’s driveway next to a Cadillac XLR. All that was needed to complete the Lutz era retractable roof trifecta was a Pontiac G6 retractable. I’ve had a soft spot for these an other retro styled vehicles of the era but did Lutz really have to drop the Camaro and Firebird for the SSR halo vehicle?
Next