Toyota Prius C: Should Allowances Be Made For Cars With Special Needs?

Michael Karesh
by Michael Karesh

During my week with the Toyota Prius c ( reviewed previously by Alex) I averaged about 62 miles-per-gallon. On my standard suburban run to the kids’ school, the trip computer once reported 82 mpg, and topped 70 mpg a number of times. But drive the Prius c “normally” with the A/C on, and the gas engine gets a little noisy and fuel economy “plummets” into the low 50s, as attested by the trip computer for my wife’s stints in the car and by the EPA (53 city, 46 highway, 50 combined). If a car achieves much better numbers only when driven in a special way, does it count? Or, if the engine somewhat noisily struggles under moderately heavy acceleration, should the car not be recommended at all?

The special method for getting the most out of a full hybrid is fairly simple in theory, but not always so simple in practice. A feathery foot on the go pedal is only part of it, and the easiest part at that (if one can ignore the faces in the rearview mirror). A light foot on the brake is even more important, as the entire point of a hybrid is to recoup kinetic energy rather than burn it off through brake friction. The heavier your foot on the brake, the more the pads and rotors must be used to slow the car. The hard part: if a light suddenly turns red or someone slows dramatically in front of you, you might not have a choice. Unless you manage to anticipate these events well in advance, you’re going to waste energy. Skilled hypermilers learn to constantly scan far down the road.

One unexpected byproduct of this driving style: safety benefits even more than fuel economy. Driver training performed as part of the Japanese ReCoo program to reduce CO2 emissions ended up improving fuel economy by 4.4 to 8.7 percent and reducing traffic accidents by 45 to 51 percent.

The largest problem I found with the Toyota Prius c wasn’t among those noted by other reviewers, some of whom have panned the car. The way I was driving the Prius c, the 73-horsepower Atkinson-cylce 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine didn’t often make much noise. When I had to accelerate con brio, the 99-horse (combined gas and electric) powertrain delivered well enough (though if you want oomph remotely worthy of a “power” mode in a Prius you’ll have to scrape together another $4,065– $2,935 after adjusting for feature differences—for the original “liftback”). Road and wind noise were no more pronounced than in the average small hatchback. I wouldn’t have felt the need to remark on them at all if others hadn’t. And the hard interior plastics were dramatically textured in at least eight different ways (I lost count) by Toyota’s ADHD-afflicted designers, so they’re at least interesting. They don’t seem notably cheap compared to those in other sub-$20,000 cars. The 2012 Honda Civic’s interior bits are considerably nastier.

Instead, the most significant problem I encountered with the Prius c involved its ability to decelerate. A critical variable when hypermiling a hybrid: how quickly can the powertrain’s generator slow the car? In the case of the Prius c, the answer is all too often “not quickly enough.” If you’re moving along at 50+ miles-per-hour, then depress the brake to the extent suggested by the driving efficiency display (the most helpful I’ve yet experienced), the car hardly slows at all. You need over a quarter mile to bring the car to complete stop from a moderately high speed without relying to a significant extent on the friction brakes. When decelerating from 40 or less this isn’t nearly as much of a factor, but it remains a factor at all but the lowest speeds.

You’ll know if you’re braking too aggressively. The information display grades you, not only overall, but each time you accelerate and each time you brake to a stop. This might sound like a PITA, but it actually can make efficient driving into a video game. Not interested? There are other screens to choose from (one of which reports the dollars you’re saving).

The Prius c suffers more from this deceleration problem than other hybrids I’ve driven because of tradeoffs made by Toyota. The Prius c weighs over 600 pounds less than the regular Prius, and only about 185 pounds more than the slightly smaller, non-hybrid Yaris. This is partly because, compared to the regular Prius, it’s nearly 20 inches shorter, a couple inches narrower, and a couple inches lower. But Toyota also reduced the size of the hybrid components and the battery pack. The smaller battery pack doesn’t only have a lower capacity. It also cannot charge and discharge as much electricity per second. (Toyota told Alex that the difference was about a third.)

The upshot: to go more than 70 miles on a gallon I had to anticipate any need to stop well in advance. This required a fair amount of luck. I couldn’t have any light go yellow when I was too far away to go through it but not far away enough to slow through regen alone. I couldn’t have cars ahead of me slow unexpectedly. I had to pay strict attention to what was going on well ahead of me at all times.

Unwilling or unable to make this happen? Then efficiency suffers even more in the Prius c than in other hybrids. Drive both the Prius and the Prius c like you would a regular car and they end up just a couple mpg apart in the high 40s to low 50s. In the interest of providing apples-to-apples comparisons, the EPA does just this, and ends up with similar numbers for both. As have other reviewers. The highest mpg logged by previous drivers: a mere 57.1.

But the Prius c does have a significant fuel economy advantage when hypermiling. The best I ever observed in the regular Prius was 66.4, and this with fewer complete stops than when I achieved 82.0 in the Prius c. Both figures were obtained on A/C-free trips where I never had to make heavy use of the brake. But even in typical suburban conditions the Prius c ends up with about a ten mile-per-gallon advantage when both are driven as efficiently as is practically possible.

So, should special performance dependent upon a modified driving style count? Or, in the interest of fairness and prevailing social norms, should a car only be evaluated when driven “normally”?

For what it’s worth, this question doesn’t apply only to the Prius c, or even only to economy cars. Back in 1985, I drove a car with a high-revving DOHC engine for the first time. The 112-horsepower 1.6-liter engine in the now legendary AE86 Corolla GT-S peaked at 6,600 rpm and redlined at 7,600. I went there. Repeatedly. This decidedly unnatural behavior (back when many engines peaked in the fours and the now-enshrined square-bodied Panthers peaked at 3,200) opened my eyes and radically transformed what I expected from a driver’s car. Enthralled, I took a friend to test drive the GT-S. He drove it, never taking the engine over 3,500 rpm, and couldn’t see what I thought was so special. As far as he could tell the GT-S drove just like a garden variety 70-horsepower Corolla!

Toyota provided the Prius c with insurance and a tank of gas (which still registered 20 percent full after 450 miles of driving).

Michael Karesh operates TrueDelta.com, an online provider of car reliability and real-world fuel economy information.

Michael Karesh
Michael Karesh

Michael Karesh lives in West Bloomfield, Michigan, with his wife and three children. In 2003 he received a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. While in Chicago he worked at the National Opinion Research Center, a leader in the field of survey research. For his doctoral thesis, he spent a year-and-a-half inside an automaker studying how and how well it understood consumers when developing new products. While pursuing the degree he taught consumer behavior and product development at Oakland University. Since 1999, he has contributed auto reviews to Epinions, where he is currently one of two people in charge of the autos section. Since earning the degree he has continued to care for his children (school, gymnastics, tae-kwan-do...) and write reviews for Epinions and, more recently, The Truth About Cars while developing TrueDelta, a vehicle reliability and price comparison site.

More by Michael Karesh

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 80 comments
  • Kokomokid Kokomokid on Jun 14, 2012

    With hybrids, at least Toyota hybrids, you get some regenerative braking, and thus, battery charging, when you let off the "gas." I suspect they come up with an algorithm to make it "feel" similar to engine braking with a regular car. Then, when you step in the brake, you get more regen braking, and if you brake hard, you also have friction braking. Friction braking is used to get the car to a complete stop from low speed. When you put a Prius shifter in "B," I'm pretty sure you are NOT getting additional regenerative braking. That mode operates by basically "shorting" the output of the motor-generator connected to the power splitter, and is intended to provide engine braking of the old fashioned variety, when the battery is fully charged from descending a long grade.

  • Roger Roger on Jul 06, 2012

    For what it's worth: Bought a Prius V (5) in November '11. Fuel economy average is 45.39 as shown below, high tank was 53 and low was 42 in the coldest part of the winter. The hybrid system takes a few minutes to fully warm up, so this hybrid's mpg's suffer when I just run down to the store and back, a longer run returns better mpg. It feels like a large car when driven, has plenty of carrying capacity. The Prius C sounds like an intriguing auto as does the upcoming Ford C Max, but we can't own em all! Date Miles Run Gallons MPG 1/30/2012 230 5.3 43.40 2/10/2012 248 5.8 42.76 2/28/2012 257 6.1 42.13 3/9/2012 304 7.185 42.31 3/15/2012 300 7.15 41.96 3/27/2012 311 6.899 45.08 4/11/2012 373 8.1 46.05 4/25/2012 400 8.64 46.30 5/11/2012 443 9.383 47.21 5/19/2012 416 9.69 42.93 6/4/2012 473 8.852 53.43 6/15/2012 522 10.517 49.63 6/25/2012 463 9.868 46.92 Cumulative Average 45.39

  • Cprescott Fisker is another brand that Heir Yutz has killed.
  • Dwford Every country is allowed to have trade restrictions except the US.
  • 1995 SC Are there any mitigation systems that would have prevented this though? We had a ship hit a bridge in Jacksonville a few years back and it was basically dumb luck it didn't collapse. This looked like a direct hit.
  • Cprescott Oh, well.
  • 28-Cars-Later "The Chinese Ministry of Commerce claimed the Inflation Reduction Act is “discriminatory”"This what your mainstream social communism has wrought: a foreign power, major geopolitical rival and the #1 global industrial competitor cries "racism" when an act of Congress in any way presents a challenge - and the saddest part is there are Americans who will process this claim and agree if only in their own minds. To be clear, Wo xihuan Zhongguoren but the under 40yo PRC raised Mainlanders I've interacted with do believe they are a master race - but that's fine right?
Next