Mini John Cooper Works GP Absolves The Sins Of Brand Dilution

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Has Mini’s over-propagation of vehicles gotten so bad that we’re actually cheering when a new special isn’t a silly two-seater or pseudo-crossover? The Mini John Cooper Works GP may be overpriced, but at least it’s got its heart in the right place.

It could do without the gauche aerokit, graphics and pizza-cutter wheels but the “race spec” suspension will only add to the Mini Cooper S JCW’s already fantastic chassis. Upgraded brakes, extra power (the new car will surely make more than the 214 horsepower than the last GP edition did) help enhance performance, and the GP also loses its back seat in the name of weight reduction.

Only 2,000 GP editions will be made, with sales going on across the globe. Expect prices to be astronomical for what this car is. But it will probably be a hoot to drive all the same.







Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Akitadog Akitadog on May 13, 2012

    I would much rather own the 2006 GP than this one, no matter how much more power this one makes. This gen MINI just doesn't match the first gen MINI in the "perfection" of the exterior design.

  • Kuman Kuman on May 14, 2012

    I drove around Mini Cooper quite often. I wonder why people are so hyped about the mini... it doesnt provide thrills like CRX does nor does it provide comfortable ride or practicality as a car of that price point. For me a Golf GTI gets much better balance between sport, comfort and practicality. Bah... I'll take a diesel SUV made by Toyota over it! ( Mini cooper )

    • Stuki Stuki on May 14, 2012

      A well set up Mini is fast on tight, narrow, roads; in a way no Golf can ever be. And in ways that cannot be captured by racing around some 20 foot wide Nurburgring. It's as close to a fwd Elise as you can get. Or possible even as close to an Elise as you can get while retaining some measure of day to day practicality. Nothing adds more to the "fun to drive" metric on narrow roads than having room for some lateral movement while still staying in your lane.

  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
  • Analoggrotto What the hell kind of news is this?
  • MaintenanceCosts Also reminiscent of the S197 cluster.I'd rather have some original new designs than retro ones, though.
Next