Jaguar, Lincoln or Volvo: Which Brand Is Worth Keeping?

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

There was a time when Ford had the luxury equivalent of three little pigs.

I’m not sure if Jaguar, Lincoln and Volvo were the industry equivalent of straws, sticks and bricks. But they were by all measures an ungodly mess of marques that bled billions out of Ford’s coffers by 2007.

Something had to be done. Enter Alan Mulally who blew out two of the brands, and only kept Lincoln after a Deliverance level of squealing by managers and executives at Ford.

In today’s exercise, you will need to pick one brand for Ford to keep. Yes, crystal balls and Monday morning quarterbacks are a common thing at most automotive blogs. So instead of shooting from the hip of the modern day, let’s look back to the time that was the late, late, late Bush era and figure out which brand offered the most potential.

Volvo had once been a leader in functional, safe and durable designs. Ye olde classic bricks of pre-Ford times had been built using the Kalmar approach to outlast the conspicuous fashions of their days. By 1989, Volvo had even offered a 740 model that was designed to last an average of 17 long Nordic winters according to the Swedish PR machine. Buying a Volvo back in the day truly meant buying a keeper par excellence.

Unfortunately, the bid to transform Volvo into an uber-Yuppie brand throughout the 2000’s had been an epic failure. 10 models, 0 hits by 2007. The XC90 and S80 were as unpopular, as the C30 and S60 were overpriced. Come to think of it, all Volvos by this time were overpriced.

Jaguar was a classic case of buying sizzle instead of steak. The $2.4 billion toilet flushing of a buyout in 1989 ($4.4 billion in today’s dollars) was followed with billions more in Ford’s failed attempt to rejuvenate a marque that had back in Thatcher’s time, released the auto industry version of an age old grandfather clock.

To undo the damage and rebuild what truly never was, Ford bequeathed Jaguar some of the most distinctive designs and beautiful interiors of modern times. Everyone considers styling to be purely subjective. However the XJ’s and XK’s of the late 90’s could have become market leaders if Ford had fewer luxury laden mouths to feed throughout the 2000’s. By 2007 Jaguar had once again become a luxury laggard.

Lincoln was the automotive equivalent of Alzheimers by 2007. The Town Car was already destined for the dustbin. The MKX and MKZ, two acronymed models that were as compromised as an MBA new hire, were even less competitive when it came to sales. As a historical footnote of the worst type, the Lincoln Mark LT pickup battled it out with the Lincoln Blackwood and Chevy SSR for worst sales flop of the decade.

What else was left? Oh, SUV’s. Plenty of opportunity for profit there. But while Escalades, Land Cruisers, and Range Rovers were still ringing up the profits, Hummer H2s, Dodge Aspens and Lincoln Navigators were rapidly becoming also-ran’s. Despite offering competitors in five different luxury markets, most Lincoln dealerships were unable to move the metal.

So guess what folks. You have to keep one. Which will it be? Swedish style, British luxury and American ingenuity are all on the table. Which one is most worth it in today’s marketplace? Discuss.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • "scarey" "scarey" on Apr 05, 2012

    American CEOs are clueless when it comes to engineering/marketing decisions, and not just in the car business. They are buzzword-spouting bean counters who can't count without an Excel spreadsheet and someone to fill it in for them. One year the buzzword is quality, the next year it is market share, and the next it is overcapacity, then portfolio, then you bring in a harpist to design the dashboard. Chrysler buys Lamborghini, then sells it. GM wants to buy Fiat, then pay $2 Billion to get out of the deal. Fiat then buys Chrysler. GM buys large interests in Isuzu, Suburu, Suzuki, Dae Woo, and sells all but Dae Woo. Why ? I don't know. He's on third, and I don't give a darn !

  • Kkt Kkt on Apr 05, 2012

    It's really hard to take a beaten-down brand and raise it up to the luxury market again. How long did it take "made in Japan" to go from a synonym for junk to a desirable feature? 1950 to 1980 or so? Is Ford going to keep at making better Lincolns at a loss for 20-30 years hoping they'll raise their reputation?

  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
  • Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
  • Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.
Next