Chinese Trade: GM Gives 51 Percent, Receives One Percent

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

There may be a deal in the works to return GM’s golden share in the increasingly important joint venture with China’s SAIC. It will be a skewed trade: The joint venture will go back to 50-50. In return, a sales company will be set up, which is majority controlled by SAIC in a 51-49 joint venture. SAIC will be controlling the most important aspect of the car business: The selling of cars.

In 2009, GM sold one percent of the 50-50 partnership.to SAIC for a token sum of $85 million. Officially, this was to allow SAIC to reflect the JV’s earnings on its books. New Chinese accounting rules say that the earnings can only be reflected if there is substantial control of the company. People had scratched their heads back then – if this share is so important, then why was the price so low? In a 10-K filing, GM explained later:

“The sale of the 1% ownership interest to SAIC was predicated on our ability to work with SAIC to obtain a $400 million line of credit from a commercial bank to us…

Remember, this was 2009, with GM hanging on for dear life. And why is the sales company suddenly a solution? Reuters explains:

“One possible option to show that SAIC is in some form of control would be to incorporate a sales company for Shanghai GM that would be majority-held by SAIC.”

This, however, is another interesting development. The word in China is that foreign joint venture partners are gaining the upper hand. China realizes that it needs a lot of foreign know-how, and that it currently is “big, but weak.” Foreigners are gaining strength on two fronts:

According to Chinese rules, you need to form a joint venture for car manufacturing. Two crucial areas of the business do not need a joint venture: Parts manufacturing and the selling of cars. Foreigners have quietly established fully owned parts manufacturing enterprises in China and are planning to do the same with distribution networks. A Chinese sales company does not need a Chinese joint venture partner, let alone one that has majority control. If that deal pans out, then GM is giving up control of something is could own outright, in exchange for going back to a 50-50 Chinese standoff situation.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 12 comments
  • Racer-esq. Racer-esq. on Oct 28, 2011

    Why would a 50 percent Chinese owned manufacturer provide cars to a 100 percent foreign owned distributor? I would think the Chinese partner would demand a 50 percent interest in any distributor that the joint venture provides cars to.

    • See 2 previous
    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Oct 28, 2011

      @Bertel Schmitt You are mistaking distributor with sales company. A sales company is the sole top level marketing organization. Think of it as a spun-off sales and marketing arm. The JV has a contract with the sales co. Whether the sales co is 100% foreign, 50-50 owned or 100% Chinese, all cars go through that company. Below that are distributors, wholesalers, dealers etc. Because car manufacture must be a JV, the fight for control is fought at the inpoints and outpoints. The inpoints are parts and component manufacturers, which can be 100% foreign. An important inpoint is development, which usually is 100% foreign controlled (unless you give that up.) The outpoint is the distribution system which can be 100% foreign. In theory, everything can be foreign in Chine except the actual assembly of cars.

  • Tekdemon Tekdemon on Oct 29, 2011

    Man that chick's Chinese sounds worse than mine. At least she cops to it being Taiwanese mandarin though it really sounds more like Taiwanese-American mandarin, lol.

    • PlentyofCars PlentyofCars on Oct 31, 2011

      My spouse is from Taiwan. She says Peggy is purposely using a foreign mandarin accent when playing the customer. Her speech is normal when playing the shopkeeper.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next