Sergio Marchionne Confirms Third Fiat Model By 2014 – But Only For Canada

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Our intrepid Brazilian correspondent Marcelo got the hearts of Canuckistani readers racing after he leaked news of an expanded Fiat lineup for Canada. According to Senhor de Vasconcellos, Fiat will add new product in Canada, where 500 sales have been much stronger than the USA. The only question is what the mystery product will be, now that Fiat head Sergio Marchionne confirmed the new model at a Toronto event.

The Globe and Mail reported a whole slew of new products, stating

“Alfa Romeo cars are planned to return to Canada and North America in 2014, while the Fiat 500L five-door and all-electric Fiat 500 EV are scheduled to arrive at the end of this year, declared Fiat Group and Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne on Monday.

There will also be another Fiat model coming by the end of next year or early 2014, without laying out specifics…”

Marcelo’s artcile named the next generation Punto and Panda will be heading to Canada, with the 500L’s late 2012 debut coming first. Next will be the Polish Italian-built Panda, followed by the next generation Punto, if the information is accurate. The 143.7 inch Panda is actually a little longer than the 500 (139.6 inches) and has 5-doors – by comparison, a 5-door Toyota Yaris is about 10 inches longer than the Panda. Nevertheless, Canadians in urban locales absolutely adore small cars, foreign cars and anything with a “premium” image, like the Mini and the Fiat 500. The Panda, if priced right, would be a good bridge between the 500 and the much larger, Mini Countryman-sized 500L. Even better would be the new Punto, which could give the Volkswagen Golf a good run for the money. Memo to Fiat – bring diesels here. Close to half of all VW’s sold here are TDIs. We will buy them.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Amripley Amripley on Mar 31, 2012

    Any talk of Canadian sales figures and the differences between the market here in and the market in the US inevitably gets skewed by the asymmetrical urban/rural divide. Something like 80% of Canadians live in cities, and for reasons of practicality (parking, fuel economy, etc.) those people do buy a lot of Fits and Golfs and Civics. At the same time, however, the fact remains that once you're outside of the major cities, the Canadian market is almost identical to the US market. In my hometown in southwestern Ontario, the best selling vehicles (just hazarding a guess here, of course) would likely be the F150, Silverado/Sierra, Impala, Ford Fusion, and then maybe a Civic or Corolla. The cities aren't representative of the way the rest of the country feels (or chooses to spend its money.)

  • 400 N 400 N on Mar 31, 2012

    Encouraging that Fiat is giving some preference to the Canadian market, allowing it to grow in some ways that are different from the US market. (Sergio Marchionne was brought up in Canada - nice that we get some recognition.) The Big 3, with some exceptions, have usually treated the local market as an extension of the US, even though local preferences were quite distinct. Smaller cars and hatchbacks have always sold better here. Even Honda has starved us of appropriate models - giving us the Ridgeline and the Odyssey, when we really wanted the Fit. PS In the classic definition - "first world" was NATO, "second world" represented the Soviet Union and its allies including China, "third world" were the non-aligned nations.

    • EChid EChid on Mar 31, 2012

      No kidding on Honda. They are so out of touch with the Canadian market. Most pre-2008 Accord buyers I know will not touch the current one because of its size, in fact they won't even look at it.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next