By on February 8, 2012

Even at Germany’s IG Metall metal workers union the daily BILD Zeitung was put aside today to make room for the fancy Wall Street Journal. The paper claims to have talked to “a GM official,” who thinks that all hell is about to break loose at Opel in Germany.

In a nutshell:

  • GM is looking at “horrendous” fourth quarter losses from Opel
  • Patience at RenCen is running out
  • The plants in Bochum, Germany, and Ellesmere Port, England, could get closed.

Said the nameless official:

“There is increasing frustration with Opel and a feeling that the cuts two years ago did not go nearly deep enough. If Opel is going to get fixed, it is going to get fixed now and cuts are going to be deep.”

GM spokesman Selim Bingol told the WSJ that “the official’s comments don’t represent the company’s official stance with the union.”

Germany’s Handelsblatt immediately was on the story and produced the scoop of the day: UAW’s Bob King becomes a member of the Opel Supervisory Board. Neither Handelsblatt in Germany nor the Detroit News in Detroit could get an official confirmation, but received no denial either. The DetN found “ source familiar with the situation” that said it’s true.

Now that’s a new and clever threat: Say ja to the firings, or we’ll sic the UAW on you.

Meanwhile a new enemy is targeting Opel: Hyundai. The Koreans want to gain market share in Germany mainly from Opel and from Ford, writes the Handelsblatt.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

9 Comments on “GM To Opel Unions: Surrender, Or We’ll Send The UAW...”

  • avatar

    In Germany, companies larger than a certain size or with a certain number of employees must have labor reps one their govermance board (Aufsitchtsrat.) And those reps are selected by employees, not shareholders. So I’m not sure what this move is supposed to do to IG-Metal. It neither “dilutes” their power nower adds new weight to the non-employee side of the board.

    • 0 avatar

      He will be on the employer side.

    • 0 avatar

      Why didn’t the UAW force the big-three to follow Germany’s way of doing things and have labor reps on the board and all that? They should have been able to do that years ago when the auto makers were still terrified of their power. It might have reduced the debilitating acrimony, us-versus-them, in the relationship between union and management at least.

  • avatar

    After having been burned by one of the opel products I can only say that I am not unbiased as I watch this play out.

  • avatar

    I have also enjoyed recently excellent Opel products, being a pleasure to drive them. Opel engineering is really top-notch and GM is lucky to have such a resource that enables to turn out very successful products. Having said that, it is true that Opel needs a strong restructuring, namely in Germany where the major manufacturing footprint is. I hope GM does the right thing to ensure the long term sustainability of Opel and the resources it provides.

  • avatar

    Wait a couple of months until Greece bails out and then attempt to close the plants.. I’m sure the German Gov will throw lots on money in to prevent that.

  • avatar

    “the official’s comments don’t represent the company’s official stance with the union.”

    Truth disguised as doublespeak. Fixing Opel immediately really is the objective, but the company just isn’t telling the union that.

    Bob King? He’ll quietly whisper to the Opel union how to retain just enough jobs without closing down the whole works. Maybe they’ll get a two-tier pay system. This way, the union bosses will keep their jobs while the rank-and-file become Lilliputians, who will wake up one day and realize their union’s leadership learned about cannibalism from the Americans.

    This will appear to serve the company (lower cost) and the union (keep some jobs), but will be insufficient to satisfy either party.

    • 0 avatar

      A two-tier pay system in Germany?

      This sounds like it’s going to cost GM a huge bundle of money since it’s so prohibitively expensive to fire workers from what I hear.

      I know they were worried about having a supplier gain all that technology and maybe becoming a future threat to their established presence. I still wonder if Magna could have made a turnaround in this unsustainable situation by now, and everyone would have come out the better for it.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    Synchromesh - @Luke42: It’s funny you say that. I used to own an apartment and it was probably the single worst decision I ever made in my life. It was a...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    Minnesota Nice - Its interesting to see the Minnesota Wild logo on the car. Looks like the car was relocated at some point. If it was a Minnesota car, I’m blown...
  • Re: Wilson: $8B Stock Buyback Would Boost General Motors’ Value

    jim brewer - I take it all back. You are right. GM sells for less than 8x earnings. I assume that they pay a small dividend, so that means...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    ajla - “Then your spectrum disorder should also require you to relate how easy it is to gain an extra 150-200lb ft out of a diesel engine.” Well, I did bring up...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    APaGttH - Agreed. Had a HUD in my 2005 Grand Prix – it is missed – every car should have it
  • Re: Bark’s Bites: Viva La Fiesta!

    faygo - snow wheels are a random thin 5-spoke MSW aluminum. all in I think the snows/wheels/mounted/shipped via magic TireRack elves to my door in 20 hours after...
  • Re: While You Were Sleeping: February 11th, 2015

    RobertRyan - Yes I agree your Union claptrap is totally senseless. GM is basically doomed as it stands and nothing you say is going to save it in Australia
  • Re: Lenders: Subprime Auto Lending Increase Not A New Bubble

    don1967 - Wise words when comparing financial bubbles separated by 50 years of amnesia, but when comparing to the recent past along with millions...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    jrmason - Then your spectrum disorder should also require you to relate how easy it is to gain an extra 150-200lb ft out of a diesel engine. With CR technology that is easily...
  • Re: Generation Why: I Want My S16

    krhodes1 - The Rover engine is ex-GM. About as modern as pushrod V8 truck motors got circa turn of the century. 4.6l, all-aluminum, Bosch Motronic integrated fuel...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States