Chinese Government Fools Autoblog, Autoguide, Leftlane News, And Sundry Others

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

From London’s Telegraph to Fox News, from Autoblog to Autoguide, the story this week is that the Chinese will turn against foreign carmakers by mandating that the Chinese government only buys Chinese cars. Why was TTAC not writing it? I learned to ignore that story. I have lived in China since 2005, and just about every year, there was an announcement that the Chinese government will from now on only buy Chinese. It never happened. Despite the annual announcements, foreign brands still account for 80 percent of the Chinese government motor pool. But maybe it’s different this time?

If you read the press and the blogs, it seems so: “China bans foreign cars from government fleet” headlines Leftlane News. In the story, they write that “the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has just released a list of the 412 cars that can be purchased by state and local governments. For the first time in the country’s recent history, every single car that is present on the list is Chinese.”

Leftlane News, along with the other breathless and superficially informed outlets have their facts wrong. Sure, there is a list. Sure, there are only Chinese cars on it. But no, this list means absolutely nothing. The list, published on a Chinese government website, says in big (Chinese) letters: DRAFT. The list is out there (allegedly) for public consultation. People can voice their opinion (deadline March 9,) and then the Chinese government will do as it may please. The Chinese government will have fooled the western media and the Chinese population, again.

Will the Chinese government legislate away the long version of the Audi A6, which (along with a white license plate) is a sign that here comes a government honcho? I don’t think so. One of the few papers that are likewise skeptical is the Wall Street Journal. It writes:

“It won’t be that simple. The new list is at the consultation stage. Even if it comes into effect, implementation will be difficult. A move last year to restrict mid-level government officials to buy smaller, cheaper cars appears to have had little impact on sales. Dealers say officials evade restrictions and get the car of their choice anyway. The new list is good public relations for a government keen to show it is cracking down on abuse of public funds. But it will be a while before China’s citizens can hope to spy officials behind the black tinted windows of a domestic brand car.

Apart from the brand cachet, there is one part of the Chinese car business that is often forgotten: Chinese joint ventures with foreign carmakers mostly are with government-owned entities. If the Chinese government buys an Audi, a Buick, a Nissan, a Mercedes, a Volkswagen, it does business with an entity that is half government-owned. If a truly “Chinese” car is bought, more often than not it comes from an independent upstart that used to produce refrigerators before venturing into cars. A face-conscious Chinese bureaucrat simply won’t be seen in a former refrigerator. Not while he’s alive.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Omnifan Omnifan on Feb 29, 2012

    I thought under communism that everyone was equal. So the politburo members should be happy with the Great Wall 34N4XL minicar.

  • George B George B on Feb 29, 2012

    Bertel, how does Geely buying Volvo affect government purchases? Is the Volvo S80 just not prestigious enough?

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Feb 29, 2012

      According to the alleged DRAFT rules, Volvos would not be admitted. Volvo did not spend 3 percent of sales in Chinese R&D. In any case, Volvo is still a Swedish company that just happens to be owned by a Chinese company .... Sorry, everybody buy BYDs ...

  • 3-On-The-Tree Alan, I was an Apache pilot and after my second back surgery I was medically boarded off of flying status due to vibrations, climbing on and off aircraft, so I was given the choice of getting out or re-branching so I switched to Military Intel. Yes your right if you can’t perform your out doesn’t matter if your at 17 years. Dad always said your just a number, he was a retired command master chief 25 years.
  • ToolGuy "Note that those vehicles are in direct competition with models Rivian sells"• I predict that we are about to hear why this statement may not be exactly true
  • ToolGuy From the relevant Haynes Repair Manual:"Caution: The 4.6L models require a special tool to extract the water pump from the coolant crossover housing. This special tool is expensive and the removal procedure is difficult. Have the water pump replaced by a dealer service department or other qualified automotive repair facility if the tool is not available."One version of the tool is Lisle 14440; I paid $10.82 (less 5% discount, plus shipping).You can see why I never attempt my own maintenance or repairs. 😉
  • Dave M. IMO this was the last of the solidly built MBs. Yes, they had the environmentally friendly disintegrating wiring harness, but besides that the mechanicals are pretty solid. I just bought my "forever" car (last new daily driver that'll ease me into retirement), but a 2015-16 E Class sedan is on my bucket list for future purchase. Beautiful design....
  • Rochester After years of self-driving being in the news, I still don't understand the psychology behind it. Not only don't I want this, but I find the idea absurd.
Next