Can't Bring Me Down: Toyota Brand Unaffected By Recalls

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The massive wave of recalls that brought some 9 million Toyotas back to the dealers, amidst a frenzied coverage by a sometimes hysteric media, did less damage to the brand than imagined. A study from North Carolina State University shows that Toyota’s safety-related recalls that began in 2009 had little to no impact on how consumers perceived the brand.

Dr. Robert Hammond, assistant professor of economics at NC State, launched the study because he wanted to see how consumers respond to recalls. Hammond looked at used-car markets as a measure of how much Toyota owners were willing to accept when selling their vehicles – and how much used-car buyers were willing to pay for them.

Hammond found that there was very little effect on what consumers were willing to pay for a Toyota. Hammond found that the average price of affected vehicles declined by approximately 2 percent relative to comparable, unaffected vehicles (such as similar Honda models). That 2 percent decline is within the statistical margin-of-error for the study. What’s more, the effect was temporary: The first Toyota recall was in November 2009, and the apparent decline in vehicle price had leveled out by January 2010.

Initial reports of drops in resale value turned out to be premature. In 2011, Toyota and Lexus were back on top in the Kelley Blue Book rankings.

Hammond did a similar analysis of Audi vehicles that were recalled due to similar acceleration concerns in 1986. The impact there was more significant. Audi showed an average price slide of over 16 percent relative to similar, unaffected vehicles over the course of six months.

The paper, “Sudden Unintended Used-Price Deceleration? The 2009-2010 Toyota Recalls” will be published in the Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 26 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Feb 19, 2012

    Obama and Bush get reelected for second term despite of running record deficits, waging unfunded wars and launching unfunded populist programs. Obama even received Nobel Peace prize for that. And how about senators doing nothing but inflicting harm to people who elected them and getting re-elected term after term for decades. That's a human nature. People are religious even if they deny it.

    • Niky Niky on Feb 19, 2012

      Stop the presses... we have a psychic in the house! Obama is going to win in 2012! Curiously... what war did Obama start? The only one I can think of is Libya, and even that one was more NATO than the US, since Obama backed out of that one...

  • Lokki Lokki on Feb 19, 2012

    I think that this situation is pretty easy to read. Toyota has built decades worth of reputation-building cars. Were they all perfect or even great? No, but generally a Toyota has been a safe bet. GM used to have this reputation (as the safest bet for a decent car) but they've spent my entire car-buying lifetime destroying it. The law of inertia applies in both cases. It will take a long time for Toyota to become perceived as a bad gamble and an equally long time for GM to become a good one. Having said that, I really believe that the Volt's lack of sales is more price-related than safety-based. To choose a Volt you have to be someone who believes that its technology or its Americanism are worth roughly $10K over comparable competition from the Leaf or the Prius along with being someone who can afford the car and and who has a situation where the car is useable. Hyundai is doing well now, but it's taken 20 years to recover from the Excel fiasco. VW's legend seems to have survived their spotty quality record fairly well, but at one point they led their Japanese competitors in the US and now are really only a niche player. Finally, we come to FIAT whose legendary rust and quality caused them to withdraw from the US market all-together. I'm very interested to see whether their history has an impact on sales. Right now, I don't think that the 500 is a valid test. It's soooo small that I tend to see it as almost as much of a niche vehicle as the Volt, although with perhaps more potential for rental fleet service.

    • Doctor olds Doctor olds on Feb 20, 2012

      @Lokki- +1! While it pleases me to see Toyota get their "turn in the barrel", surpassing all other brands in number of recalls and getting lots of negative media attention, the unintended acceleration issue was not really much of a product issue. They do have over twice tthe rate of UA complaints as GM, though. With production capacity back, this year should show whether Toyota can re-capture the share they lost over the last couple of years. Their peak share of 17% was in 2009, and they lost half a point at 16.5% in 2010, before falling off all the way to 14.1% share in 2011.

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next